Flexible carbon nanotube nanocomposite sensor for multiple physiological parameter monitoring
read more
Citations
Graphene and its sensor-based applications: A review
Wearable Flexible Sensors: A Review
Carbon nanotubes and its gas-sensing applications: A review
3D Printed Sensors for Biomedical Applications: A Review.
Recent Developments in Printing Flexible and Wearable Sensing Electronics for Healthcare Applications
References
Inkjet Printing of Polymers: State of the Art and Future Developments
Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer
A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring
Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly
Towards the Implementation of IoT for Environmental Condition Monitoring in Homes
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. What are some types of wearable sensors used for monitoring of physical activities involving limb movements?
Shoe sensors [26] and braces [27] are some types of wearable sensors used for monitoring of physical activities involving limb movements.
Q3. Why were MWCNTs chosen as filler for nanocomposite?
The MWCNTs were chosen as filler for nanocomposite due to their high electrical conductivity and flexibility along with their aspect ratio.
Q4. What are the main reasons for the use of sensors?
Light weight, low cost of fabrication, long lasting capability are some of the reasons for their increased usage over rigid substrates.
Q5. What are the advantages of sensors for smart home use?
The sensors developed for smart home usage are mainly dedicated for single parameter monitoring purposes like PIR sensors [18], pressure sensors, etc.
Q6. What is the main reason why PDMS was used for the development of flexible sensors?
PDMS had been substantially used [1-3] for the development of flexible sensors due to its low cost, non-toxicitiy, inertness and hydrophobic nature.
Q7. How much angular variation of the limbs was considered up to 1300?
The angular variation of the limbs was considered up to 1300 because the limbs do not bend further with respect to the reference.
Q8. What is the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitive device?
The capacitance of any parallel plate capacitive device can be generally expressed by,𝐶 = (∈𝑜∗∈𝑟∗ 𝐴) 𝑑⁄ (1)where, C is the capacitance of the interdigital sensor, ∈𝑜 = 8.85 is the × 10 −12 F·m−1 is the permittivity of vacuum, ∈𝑟 is the relative permittivity, A is the effective area, and d is the effective spacing between electrodes of different polarity.
Q9. What can be used to monitor a physiological event?
This can be exploited to monitor a physiological event through the change in capacitance based on the deformation-reformation of the sensor patch.
Q10. What is the effect of tensile stress on the sensor patch?
The exertion of tensile stress on the patch via a physiological event changes the capacitance with respect to its normal position [36, 37].
Q11. How many % wt. of CNT was used to cut the nanocompo?
Followed by the adjustment of the thickness of the nanocomposite layer by the casting knife to around 600 µm, the sample was again desiccated for 2 hours to remove any trapped air bubbles.
Q12. What are the advantages of the sensor patch development shown in this paper?
The sensor patch development shown in this paper is much simpler and easier to fabricate compared to previously developed sensors, which had been fabricated for multiple functions containing a coil [19-21] operating on a magnetic principle.
Q13. Who provided the facilities to design and fabricate the sensor patches?
The authors would like to thank King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia, for providing the research facilities to design and fabricate the sensor patches.
Q14. What is the effect of the contraction and expansion of the sensor patch?
The contraction and expansion happening to the sensor patch simultaneously with the movement of the diaphragm caused a change in inter-electrode distance (d) and area (A) of the sensing surface of the sensor.