scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Improving empirical antibiotic treatment using TREAT, a computerized decision support system: cluster randomized trial

TLDR
TREAT improved the rate of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment while reducing antibiotic costs and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment.
Abstract
Background: Appropriate antibiotic treatment decreases mortality, while superfluous treatment is associated with antibiotic resistance. We built a computerized decision support system for antibiotic treatment (TREAT) targeting these outcomes. Methods: Prospective cohort study comparing TREAT’s advice to physician’s treatment followed by a cluster randomized trial comparing wards using TREAT (intervention) versus antibiotic monitoring without TREAT (control). We included patients suspected of harbouring bacterial infections in three hospitals (Israel, Germany and Italy). The primary outcome, appropriate antibiotic treatment, was assessed among patients with microbiologically documented infections (MDI). Length of hospital stay, adverse events, mortality (interventional trial) and antibiotic costs (both studies), including costs related to future antibiotic resistance, were compared among all included patients. Results: Among 1203 patients included in the cohort study (350 with MDI), TREAT prescribed appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment significantly more frequently than physicians (70% versus 57%, P < 0.001) using less broad-spectrum antibiotics at half physicians’ antibiotic costs. The randomized trial included 2326 patients, 570 with MDI. The rate of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was higher in intervention versus control wards [73% versus 64%, odds ratio (OR): 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95–2.29, intention to treat, adjusted for location and clustering]. For patients treated according to TREAT’s advice in intervention wards, the difference with controls was highly significant (OR: 3.40, 95% CI: 2.25–5.14). Length of hospital stay, costs related to future resistance and total antibiotic costs were lower in intervention versus control wards. Conclusions: TREAT improved the rate of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment while reducing antibiotic costs and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients

TL;DR: This systematic review of interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients showed interventions to be associated with improvement in prescribing according to antibiotic policy in routine clinical practice, with 70% of interventions being hospital-wide compared with 31% for RCTs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems: A Systematic Review

TL;DR: Both commercially and locally developed CDSSs are effective at improving health care process measures across diverse settings, but evidence for clinical, economic, workload, and efficiency outcomes remains sparse.
Journal Article

Effect of Clinical Decision-Support Systems

TL;DR: In this paper, a review summarizes trials of clinical decision support systems implemented in clinical settings to aid decision-making at the point-of-care (POC) level, and concludes that the evidence to support widespread use of CDSSs is lacking.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in Sepsis

TL;DR: An American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference was held in Northbrook in August 1991 with the goal of agreeing on a set of definitions that could be applied to patients with sepsis and its sequelae as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

TL;DR: Improvement in practitioner performance was associated with CDSSs that automatically prompted users compared with requiring users to activate the system and studies in which the authors were not the developers, as well as other factors.
Related Papers (5)