Journal ArticleDOI
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
TLDR
This report hopes this report will generate further thought about ways to improve the quality of reports of meta-analyses of RCTs and that interested readers, reviewers, researchers, and editors will use the QUOROM statement and generate ideas for its improvement.About:
This article is published in The Lancet.The article was published on 1999-11-27. It has received 4767 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Checklist.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal Article
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement [in Spanish]
David Moher,Alessandro Liberati,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Douglas G. Altman,Gerd Antes,David C. Atkins,Virginia Barbour,N Barrowman,Jesse A. Berlin,J Clark,Mike Clarke,Deborah J. Cook,Roberto D'Amico,Jonathan J Deeks,Philip J. Devereaux,Kay Dickersin,M Egger,E Ernst,P C Gøtzsche,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,G Guyatt,Julian P T Higgins,Ioannidis Jpa.,Jos Kleijnen,Tom Lang,N Magrini,D McNamee,Lorenzo Moja,C Mulrow,M Napoli,Andrew D Oxman,B Pham,Drummond Rennie,Margaret Sampson,Kenneth F. Schulz,Paul G. Shekelle,David Tovey,Peter Tugwell +37 more
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +10 more
TL;DR: An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary?
Alejandro R. Jadad,R. A. Moore,Dawn Carroll,C. Jenkinson,David Reynolds,David J. Gavaghan,Henry J McQuay +6 more
TL;DR: An instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research is described and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality is described.
Journal ArticleDOI
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
TL;DR: Empirical evidence is provided that inadequate methodological approaches in controlled trials, particularly those representing poor allocation concealment, are associated with bias.
Journal ArticleDOI
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
Colin B. Begg,Mildred K. Cho,Susan Eastwood,Richard Horton,David Moher,Ingram Olkin,Roy M. Pitkin,Drummond Rennie,Kenneth F. Schulz,David L. Simel,Donna F. Stroup +10 more
TL;DR: For RCTs to ultimately benefit patients, the published report should be of the highest possible standard and should provide the reader with the ability to make informed judgments regarding the internal and external validity of the trial.
Journal ArticleDOI
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses
David Moher,David Moher,Ba' Pham,Alison Jones,Deborah J. Cook,Alejandro R. Jadad,Michael Moher,Peter Tugwell,Terry P. Klassen,Terry P. Klassen +9 more
TL;DR: Study of low methodological quality in which the estimate of quality is incorporated into the meta-analyses can alter the interpretation of the benefit of intervention, whether a scale or component approach is used in the assessment of trial quality.
Journal ArticleDOI
Publication bias in clinical research
TL;DR: The presence of publication bias in a cohort of clinical research studies is confirmed and it is suggested that conclusions based only on a review of published data should be interpreted cautiously, especially for observational studies.