scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Inhalation toxicity of cyclododecatriene in rats.

TLDR
Cyclododecatriene (CDDT, CAS No. 4904-61-4) was tested for its inhalation toxicity in rats following repeated exposures and no specific neurotoxicity was detected and the histopathologic response was limited to reversible changes in the nasal epithelia in rats exposed to 260 ppm.
Abstract
Cyclododecatriene (CDDT, CAS No. 4904-61-4) was tested for its inhalation toxicity in rats following repeated exposures. Male rats were exposed nose-only to CDDT for 6 hr/day, 5 days/wk for a total of 9 exposures over 2 weeks. Particular attention was paid to neurotoxicologic endpoints. Concentrations of 0 (control), 5, 50, and 260 ppm were studied. The 260 ppm chamber contained both vapor and aerosol while the 5 and 50 ppm chambers were vapor only. Four groups of 10 rats each were used to measure standard clinical signs and growth, clinical pathology (including hematology, biochemistries, and urine analysis), and tissue pathology. Another 4 groups of similar size were used for neurotoxicity testing. In the standard toxicity groups, 1/2 of the rats were sacrificed 1 day following the 9th exposure; the other half underwent a 2-week recovery period prior to being sacrificed (recovery group). During the exposures rats inhaling 260 ppm had a diminished or absent response to an alerting stimulus. Irregular respiration and lethargy were observed in these rats immediately following exposure. These signs were rapidly reversible and were not seen prior to the subsequent exposure. Body weights in rats exposed to either 50 or 260 ppm were significantly lower than the corresponding controls. No compound-related clinical pathology changes were seen in any of the test groups and tissue pathology effects only occurred in the nasal tissue. In rats exposed to 260 ppm, minimal degeneration/necrosis of nasal olfactory epithelium was observed in rats examined immediately following the exposure period. This change was not seen in the recovery rats. Functional observational battery (FOB) assessments and motor activity (MA) evaluations conducted after the 4th and 9th exposures on rats from all test groups, and specific neuropathologic evaluation on perfused brain, spinal cord, and skeletal muscle from rats exposed to 260 ppm failed to demonstrate any specific neurotoxicity. Outward signs of sedation were seen at the top level tested. Under the conditions of this test, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was determined to be 5 ppm based upon a reduced rate of body weight gain in the 50 ppm group. No specific neurotoxicity was detected and the histopathologic response was limited to reversible changes in the nasal epithelia in rats exposed to 260 ppm.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Reproductive and repeated dose toxicity of cyclododecatriene (CDDT) in rats following oral (gavage) treatment.

TL;DR: During this study, statistically significant treatment-related changes were observed in several clinical pathology parameters and decreases in red cell mass (RBC, HGB, HCT) were minimal and, due to the magnitude, were not expected to result in biological effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of the potential developmental toxicity of cyclododecatriene (CDDT).

TL;DR: The no-observed-effect level (NOEL) for maternal toxicity was 10 ppm, and the NOEL for developmental toxicity was 25 ppm, because developmentaloxicity was observed only after exposures that also produced signs of maternal toxicity, CDDT was not considered to be a selective developmental toxicant in the rat.
Journal ArticleDOI

Inhalation toxicity of cyclooctadiene in rats.

TL;DR: Based on the decreased alerting response observed in rats during exposure at 500 ppm, and on the effects observed in the nose, kidney, and urine in rats at this concentration, the no-observed-adverse-effect (NOAEL) level in this study was considered to be 150 ppm.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Categorical Data Analysis

Alan Agresti
- 01 May 1991 - 
TL;DR: In this article, categorical data analysis was used for categorical classification of categorical categorical datasets.Categorical Data Analysis, categorical Data analysis, CDA, CPDA, CDSA
Book

Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks

TL;DR: Rank Tests for Comparing Two Treatments and Blocked Comparisons for two Treatments in a Population Model and the One-Sample Problem as discussed by the authors were used to compare more than two treatments.
Book

Multiple Comparison Procedures

TL;DR: In this article, a theory of multiple comparison problems is presented, along with a procedure for pairwise and more general comparisons among all treatments among all the treatments in a clinical trial.
Book

The analysis of linear models

R. R. Hocking
TL;DR: In this article, the distribution of linear and quadratic functions of normal vectors is modeled as a linear model and the analysis of means and variance is performed for simple linear models and more complex models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Respiratory tract lesions induced by sensory irritants at the RD50 concentration.

TL;DR: Findings give additional support to the potential value of the RD50 model for setting occupational exposure guidelines and predicting the risk of injury to the respiratory tract from exposure to airborne sensory irritants.
Related Papers (5)