scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Interfacial turbulence: Hydrodynamic instability and the marangoni effect

C.V. Sternling, +1 more
- 01 Dec 1959 - 
- Vol. 5, Iss: 4, pp 514-523
TLDR
In this article, a simplified mathematical model has been analyzed in order to detail the mechanism of the "interfacial engine" which supplies the mechanical energy of interfacial turbulence, which is a manifestation of hydrodynamic instability, touched off by ever present, small, random fluctuations about the interface.
Abstract
The origin of interfacial turbulence, spontaneous agitation of the interface between two unequilibrated liquids, has been explained in terms of classical flow, diffusion, and surface processes. The essence of the explanation is the long-known though much neglected Marangoni effect, wherein movement in an interface is caused by longitudinal variations of interfacial tension. It is proposed that interfacial turbulence is a manifestation of hydrodynamic instability, which is touched off by ever present, small, random fluctuations about the interface. A simplified mathematical model has been analyzed in order to detail the mechanism of the “interfacial engine” which supplies the mechanical energy of interfacial turbulence. In its present form the analysis incorporates several drastic simplifications, though ways of removing some of these have been suggested. The groundwork has been laid for the more elaborate analyses that are needed for a decisive test of the theory. The analysis shows how some systems may be stable with solute transfer in one direction yet unstable with transfer in the opposite direction, a striking result. It also suggests that interfacial turbulence is usually promoted by (1) solute transfer out of the phase of higher viscosity, (2) solute transfer out of the phase in which its diffusivity is lower, (3) large differences in kinematic viscosity and solute diffusivity between the two phases, (4) steep concentration gradients near the interface, (5) interfacial tension highly sensitive to solute concentration, (6) low viscosities and diffusivities in both phases, (7) absence of surface-active agents, and (8) interfaces of large extent. That some of these effects have been observed in the laboratory lends credence to the theory.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preparation of poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles by modified spontaneous emulsification solvent diffusion method

TL;DR: The proposed modified-SESD method can be used to provide PLGA nanoparticles of satisfactory quality at an acceptable yield for industrial purposes and elucidate the mechanism of nanoparticle formation on the basis of the phase separation principle.
Journal ArticleDOI

Polymeric nanoparticles: A study on the preparation variables and characterization methods

TL;DR: This review focuses on the toolbox of available methods for the preparation of polymeric nanoparticles and highlights some recent examples from the literature that demonstrate the influence of the preparation method on the physicochemical characteristics of the nanoparticles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding and guiding the phase inversion process for synthesis of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes

TL;DR: In this article, a review on the preparation aspects of integrally skinned asymmetric membranes to be applied in the field of solvent resistant nanofiltration via phase inversion is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Influence of stabilizing agents and preparative variables on the formation of poly(D,L-lactic acid) nanoparticles by an emulsification-diffusion technique

TL;DR: In this article, a modified emulsification-diffusion technique was used to produce poly(d,l-lactic acid) (PLA) nanoparticles by using a stabilizing agent.
Journal ArticleDOI

Process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A critical review

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated different process intensification (PI) technologies for their suitability in post-combustion CO2 capture (PCC) using solvent process is one of the most mature carbon capture technologies There are two main barriers for PCC process using solvent to be commercially deployed: (a) high capital cost; (b) high thermal efficiency penalty due to solvent regeneration
Related Papers (5)