scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Interfacial turbulence: Hydrodynamic instability and the marangoni effect

C.V. Sternling, +1 more
- 01 Dec 1959 - 
- Vol. 5, Iss: 4, pp 514-523
TLDR
In this article, a simplified mathematical model has been analyzed in order to detail the mechanism of the "interfacial engine" which supplies the mechanical energy of interfacial turbulence, which is a manifestation of hydrodynamic instability, touched off by ever present, small, random fluctuations about the interface.
Abstract
The origin of interfacial turbulence, spontaneous agitation of the interface between two unequilibrated liquids, has been explained in terms of classical flow, diffusion, and surface processes. The essence of the explanation is the long-known though much neglected Marangoni effect, wherein movement in an interface is caused by longitudinal variations of interfacial tension. It is proposed that interfacial turbulence is a manifestation of hydrodynamic instability, which is touched off by ever present, small, random fluctuations about the interface. A simplified mathematical model has been analyzed in order to detail the mechanism of the “interfacial engine” which supplies the mechanical energy of interfacial turbulence. In its present form the analysis incorporates several drastic simplifications, though ways of removing some of these have been suggested. The groundwork has been laid for the more elaborate analyses that are needed for a decisive test of the theory. The analysis shows how some systems may be stable with solute transfer in one direction yet unstable with transfer in the opposite direction, a striking result. It also suggests that interfacial turbulence is usually promoted by (1) solute transfer out of the phase of higher viscosity, (2) solute transfer out of the phase in which its diffusivity is lower, (3) large differences in kinematic viscosity and solute diffusivity between the two phases, (4) steep concentration gradients near the interface, (5) interfacial tension highly sensitive to solute concentration, (6) low viscosities and diffusivities in both phases, (7) absence of surface-active agents, and (8) interfaces of large extent. That some of these effects have been observed in the laboratory lends credence to the theory.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dynamics and universal scaling law in geometrically-controlled sessile drop evaporation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors deduce a universal scaling law for the evaporation rate valid for any shape and demonstrate that more curved regions lead to preferential localized depositions in particle-laden drops.
Journal ArticleDOI

Direct microscopic observation of membrane formation by nonsolvent induced phase separation

TL;DR: In this article, the authors observed the formation of finger-like macrovoids by convective flow of nonsolvent into the polymer-solvent solution, which arose from interfacial energy gradients at the polymer solution-nonsolvent interface.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coalescence of Drops

TL;DR: In this paper, a review examines different stages of the coalescence process of liquid drops on a planar interface under different conditions, focusing on the effect of viscous stress, Marangoni stress, and electric field stress.
Journal ArticleDOI

Surface Tension of Organic Acids + Water Binary Mixtures from 20 °C to 50 °C

TL;DR: The surface tension of aqueous solutions of formic acid, acetic acid, and propionic acid were measured over the entire concentration range at temperatures (20 to 50) °C as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nanosuspension: a new vehicle for the improvement of the delivery of drugs to the ocular surface. Application to amphotericin B.

TL;DR: Eudragit RS 100 nanosuspension may represent an efficacious vehicle to deliver the drug into the eye and is being considered for local ophthalmologic therapy of fungal disease.
Related Papers (5)