scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Interfacial turbulence: Hydrodynamic instability and the marangoni effect

C.V. Sternling, +1 more
- 01 Dec 1959 - 
- Vol. 5, Iss: 4, pp 514-523
TLDR
In this article, a simplified mathematical model has been analyzed in order to detail the mechanism of the "interfacial engine" which supplies the mechanical energy of interfacial turbulence, which is a manifestation of hydrodynamic instability, touched off by ever present, small, random fluctuations about the interface.
Abstract
The origin of interfacial turbulence, spontaneous agitation of the interface between two unequilibrated liquids, has been explained in terms of classical flow, diffusion, and surface processes. The essence of the explanation is the long-known though much neglected Marangoni effect, wherein movement in an interface is caused by longitudinal variations of interfacial tension. It is proposed that interfacial turbulence is a manifestation of hydrodynamic instability, which is touched off by ever present, small, random fluctuations about the interface. A simplified mathematical model has been analyzed in order to detail the mechanism of the “interfacial engine” which supplies the mechanical energy of interfacial turbulence. In its present form the analysis incorporates several drastic simplifications, though ways of removing some of these have been suggested. The groundwork has been laid for the more elaborate analyses that are needed for a decisive test of the theory. The analysis shows how some systems may be stable with solute transfer in one direction yet unstable with transfer in the opposite direction, a striking result. It also suggests that interfacial turbulence is usually promoted by (1) solute transfer out of the phase of higher viscosity, (2) solute transfer out of the phase in which its diffusivity is lower, (3) large differences in kinematic viscosity and solute diffusivity between the two phases, (4) steep concentration gradients near the interface, (5) interfacial tension highly sensitive to solute concentration, (6) low viscosities and diffusivities in both phases, (7) absence of surface-active agents, and (8) interfaces of large extent. That some of these effects have been observed in the laboratory lends credence to the theory.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Detailed finite element method modeling of evaporating multi-component droplets

TL;DR: The evaporation of sessile multi-component droplets is modeled with an axisymmetic finite element method and results are compared with corresponding results of aubrication theory model, showing that the application of lubrication theory can cause considerable errors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mass transfer, marangoni effect, and instability of interfacial longitudinal waves: I. Diffusional exchanges

TL;DR: In this article, a general formalism is developed to study interfacial instability of two immiscible incompressible fluids, and necessary and sufficient instability conditions for oscillating and non oscillating regimes are given for long wavelengths.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pattern formation and mass transfer under stationary solutal Marangoni instability

TL;DR: By reviewing these works, it is shown that three main building blocks exist during the nonlinear evolution of the oscillatory instability: roll cells, relaxation oscillations and relaxation oscillation waves.
Journal ArticleDOI

Oscillatory instability in a Bénard problem of two fluids

TL;DR: In this paper, a linear stability analysis for a Benard problem with two layers is considered, and it is shown numerically that when the viscosities and coefficients of cubical expansion of the fluids are different, a Hopf bifurcation can occur, resulting in a pair of traveling waves or a standing wave.
Related Papers (5)