Journal ArticleDOI
IS '95: guidelines for undergraduate IS curriculum
J. Daniel Couger,Gordon B. Davis,Dorothy G. Dologite,David L. Feinstein,John T. Gorgone,A. Milton Jenkins,George M. Kasper,Joyce Currie Little,Herbert E. Longenecker,Joseph S. Valacich +9 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The first joint curriculum development effort for undergraduate programs in information systems is described in this paper, where the curriculum recommendations are a collaborative effort of the following organizations: ACM, AIS, DPMA, and ICIS.Abstract:
This paper provides an overview report of the first joint curriculum development effort for undergraduate programs in information systems. The curriculum recommendations are a collaborative effort of the following organizations: ACM, AIS, DPMA, and ICIS. After a summary of the objectives and rationale for the curriculum, the curriculum model is described. Input and output attributes of graduates are delineated. Resource requirements for effective IS programs are then identified. Lastly, there is a proposal for maintaining currency of the curriculum through electronic media.read more
Citations
More filters
IS 2010 Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Association for Information Systems (AIS)
Heikki Topi,Joseph S. Valacich,Ryan T. Wright,Kate M. Kaiser,Jay F. Nunamaker,Jr . Janice,G.-J. de Vreede +6 more
TL;DR: The IS 2010 report is the latest output from model curriculum work for Information Systems (IS) that began in the early 1970s and is grounded in the expected requirements of industry, represents the views of organizations employing the graduates, and is supported by other IS-related organizations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems
Heikki Topi,Kate M. Kaiser,Janice C. Sipior,Joseph S. Valacich,Jay F. Nunamaker,G.-J. de Vreede,Ryan T. Wright +6 more
TL;DR: The most recent version of the IS undergraduate model curriculum is IS 2002 (Gorgone et al., 2003) published in early 2003 as discussed by the authors, which is the most recent output from model curriculum work for Information Systems (IS) that began in the early 1970s.
Journal ArticleDOI
IS '97: model curriculum and guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information systems
Guidelines for undergraduate degree programs on Model curriculum and guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information systems
TL;DR: The IS'97 report as mentioned in this paper is the latest output from model curriculum work for information systems that began in the early 1970s and has matured over a twenty year period, and represents the combined effort of numerous individuals and reflects the interests of thousands of faculty.
Journal ArticleDOI
An Exploratory Analysis of the Value of the Skills of IT Personnel: Their Relationship to IS Infrastructure and Competitive Advantage
TL;DR: It is found that softer IT personnel skills do affect IS success, technical skills are viewed as the most important skill set in affecting IS infrastructure flexibility and competitive advantage, and modularity is viewed as more valuable to competitive advantage than integration.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A Sign That Education is Maturing: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
TL;DR: Using Bloom's Taxonomy to Write Effective Learning Objectives: The Abcds of Writing Learning ObjectIVES: A Basic Guide.
Journal ArticleDOI
Information systems curriculum recommendations for the 80s: undergraduate and graduate programs
TL;DR: The structure of both bachelor's and master's level programs are described and courses are defined and the continuing need for education related to the definition, analysis, design, construction, and management of information systems in organizations is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
A comparative analysis of the topic areas of computer science, software engineering, and information systems
TL;DR: There have been many successes over the years in defining and refining curricula’ for the related fields of computer science, software engineering, and information systems, but there have been surprisingly few attempts to compare and contrast those curricula.