scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment

Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, +1 more
- 01 Aug 2004 - 
- Vol. 256, Iss: 2, pp 91-100
TLDR
A systematic review of 114 randomized trials that compared placebo‐treated patients with untreated patients could not confirm that placebo interventions induce powerful effects.
Abstract
. Background. It is widely believed that placebo interventions induce powerful effects. We could not confirm this in a systematic review of 114 randomized trials that compared placebo-treated with untreated patients. Aim.  To study whether a new sample of trials would reproduce our earlier findings, and to update the review. Methods.  Systematic review of trials that were published since our last search (or not previously identified), and of all available trials. Results.  Data was available in 42 out of 52 new trials (3212 patients). The results were similar to our previous findings. The updated review summarizes data from 156 trials (11 737 patients). We found no statistically significant pooled effect in 38 trials with binary outcomes, relative risk 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.89–1.01). The effect on continuous outcomes decreased with increasing sample size, and there was considerable variation in effect also between large trials; the effect estimates should therefore be interpreted cautiously. If this bias is disregarded, the pooled standardized mean difference in 118 trials with continuous outcomes was −0.24 (−0.31 to −0.17). For trials with patient-reported outcomes the effect was −0.30 (−0.38 to −0.21), but only −0.10 (−0.20 to 0.01) for trials with observer-reported outcomes. Of 10 clinical conditions investigated in three trials or more, placebo had a statistically significant pooled effect only on pain or phobia on continuous scales. Conclusion.  We found no evidence of a generally large effect of placebo interventions. A possible small effect on patient-reported continuous outcomes, especially pain, could not be clearly distinguished from bias.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Blinding Protocols, Treatment Credibility, and Expectancy: Methodologic Issues in Clinical Trials of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

TL;DR: In clinical trials, OMT may be perceived by subjects as a more credible treatment alternative than many control procedures, and study design should be optimized to equalize these effects among interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Character Strength-Based Intervention to Promote Satisfaction with Life in the Chinese University Context

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the efficacy of a strength-based intervention program among Chinese undergraduates to increase satisfaction with life and found that students who were informed about the purpose of the intervention, as well as those in the strength-training group exhibited more increase in satisfaction with the life.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Placebo Analgesic Effect in Healthy Individuals and Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

TL;DR: It is suggested that patients benefited from placebo treatment to a greater degree than healthy individuals did and that studies on healthy individuals may underestimate the magnitude of the placebo analgesic effect in patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

The placebo effect in allergen-specific immunotherapy trials

TL;DR: SIT studies display a significant placebo effect, mainly observed in subcutaneous immunotherapy, with high variability depending on the route of application and allergen exposure, which indicates the differential role of the placebo effect in SIT efficacy depending onThe route of administration and pollen exposure.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Neural Bases of Placebo Effects in Pain

TL;DR: It is suggested that placebo treatments can alter experience, not just alter what participants are willing to report about pain, to the extent that they involve neural systems mediating expectancy and appraisal.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

TL;DR: A new quantity is developed, I 2, which the authors believe gives a better measure of the consistency between trials in a meta-analysis, which is susceptible to the number of trials included in the meta- analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

TL;DR: Funnel plots, plots of the trials' effect estimates against sample size, are skewed and asymmetrical in the presence of publication bias and other biases Funnel plot asymmetry, measured by regression analysis, predicts discordance of results when meta-analyses are compared with single large trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials*

TL;DR: This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of a certain treatment for a specified medical condition and suggests a simple noniterative procedure for characterizing the distribution of treatment effects in a series of studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

The powerful placebo

Henry K. Beecher
- 24 Dec 1955 - 
TL;DR: It is interesting that Pepper could say as recently as 10 years ago "apparently there has never been a paper published discussing the important subject of the placebo," but in 1953 Gaddum1 said: Such tablets are sometimes called placebos, but it is better to call them dummies.
Book

Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services

TL;DR: The National Health Service Evaluation of evidence Effectiveness and efficiency Illustrative examples A preliminary evaluation Equality in the health services Conclusions Summary Postcript References Some reflections Obituary.
Related Papers (5)