scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Is watch and wait a safe and effective way to treat rectal cancer in older patients

TLDR
W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim was assess the oncological and functional outcome of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach in older patients with a clinical (near)complete response after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. Material and methods: Patients were included in a W&W-approach (2004–2019) when digital rectal examination, endoscopy and MRI showed a (near)clinical complete response. Patients underwent endoscopy and MRI every 3 months during the first year, and 6-monthly thereafter. Patients aged ≥75 and ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU) were selected. Oncological outcomes were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Functional outcome was assessed with colostomy-free rate, Vaizey incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome-score and International Prostate Syndrome Score. Results: 43/304 (14%) of patients in a W&W-approach met the inclusion criteria. Median FU was 37 (24–109) months. 5/43(12%) developed a local regrowth. All were treated surgically, with one patient experiencing a pelvic failure. Distant metastases occurred in 3/43 patients and 4 patients died, 3 of whom not related to rectal cancer. The 3-year local regrowth-free rate was 88%, 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival 91%, overall survival 97% and 3-year colostomy-free rate 93%. Overall, the bowel- and urinary dysfunction scores at 3, 12 and 24 months indicated good continence, no or minor LARS and moderate urinary problems. Conclusion: W&W for older patients with a clinical (near) complete response appears to be a safe alternative to a total mesorectal excision (TME), with a very high pelvic control rate, and few rectal cancer related deaths. Most patients can avoid major surgery and a definitive colostomy, and have a reasonable anorectal and urinary function.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer : recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project

TL;DR: The steering committee of the SICG-SIFIPAC-SICE-WSES consensus for the multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer aims to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: epidemiology, pre-intervention strategies, diagnosis and staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, watch and wait strategy, adjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous liver metastases, and emergency presentation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimising functional outcomes in rectal cancer surgery

TL;DR: The causes of dysfunction after anterior resection (AR) and the accordingly preventive strategies are explored and the indication for low AR in the light of functional outcome is discussed and the last therapeutic strategies to deal with bowel, anorectal, and urogenital disorders are depicted.
Journal ArticleDOI

Low anterior resection syndrome: can it be prevented?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored an extensive bibliographic research on preventive strategies for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and concluded that the role of defunctioning stoma, local excision, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and non operative management seems to significantly affect risk of LARS, while type of anastomosis and surgical TME approach do not impact on LARS incidence or gravity in the long term period.
Journal ArticleDOI

Survival of surgical and non-surgical older patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer: A population-based study in the Netherlands

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the characteristics and survival of surgical and non-surgical older patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Netherlands.
Journal ArticleDOI

The survival gap between young and older patients after surgical resection for colorectal cancer remains largely based on early mortality: A EURECCA comparison of four European countries.

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors investigated whether a survival gap between younger and older patients with colorectal cancer still exists on a national level in four European countries, namely Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association.

TL;DR: The AUA symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia was developed and validated by a multidisciplinary measurement committee of the American Urological Association and is clinically sensible, reliable, valid and responsive.
Journal ArticleDOI

Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results.

TL;DR: Stage 0 rectal cancer disease is associated with excellent long-term results irrespective of treatment strategy and Surgical resection may not lead to improved outcome in this situation and may be associated with high rates of temporary or definitive stoma construction and unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems

TL;DR: Existing scales for the assessment of faecal incontinence correlate well with careful clinical impression of severity, and serve as useful and reproducible measures for comparison of patients and treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

TL;DR: A valid and reliable LARS score correlated to QoL is constructed–-a simple tool for quick clinical evaluation of the severity of LARS.