scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews

TLDR
There is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing loneliness or social isolation, and hence the need to tailor interventions to suit the needs of individuals, specific groups or the degree of loneliness experienced.
Abstract
Loneliness and social isolation are growing public health concerns in our ageing society. Whilst these experiences occur across the life span, 50% of individuals aged over 60 are at risk of social isolation and one-third will experience some degree of loneliness later in life. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the range of interventions to reduce loneliness and social isolation among older adults that have been evaluated; in terms of intervention conceptualisation, categorisation, and components. Three electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase and Medline) were systematically searched for relevant published reviews of interventions for loneliness and social isolation. Inclusion criteria were: review of any type, published in English, a target population of older people and reported data on the categorisation of loneliness and/or social isolation interventions. Data extracted included: categories of interventions and the reasoning underpinning this categorisation. The methodology framework proposed by Arskey and O’Malley and further developed by Levac, et al. was used to guide the scoping review process. A total of 33 reviews met the inclusion criteria, evaluating a range of interventions targeted at older people residing in the community or institutionalised settings. Authors of reviews included in this paper often used the same terms to categorise different intervention components and many did not provide a clear definition of these terms. There were inconsistent meanings attributed to intervention characteristics. Overall, interventions were commonly categorised on the basis of: 1) group or one-to-one delivery mode, 2) the goal of the intervention, and 3) the intervention type. Several authors replicated the categorisation system used in previous reviews. Many interventions have been developed to combat loneliness and social isolation among older people. The individuality of the experience of loneliness and isolation may cause difficulty in the delivery of standardised interventions. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing loneliness or social isolation, and hence the need to tailor interventions to suit the needs of individuals, specific groups or the degree of loneliness experienced. Therefore, future research should be aimed at discerning what intervention works for whom, in what particular context and how.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19.

TL;DR: There was no large increase in loneliness but remarkable resilience in response to COVID-19, and individuals living alone and those with at least one chronic condition reported feeling lonelier at baseline but did not increase inoneliness during the implementation of social distancing measures.
Journal ArticleDOI

The COVID-19 pandemic: A pandemic of lockdown loneliness and the role of digital technology

TL;DR: It is suggested that the most disadvantaged and vulnerable people who are more prone to lockdown loneliness are provided with access to digital technology so that they can connect socially with their loved ones and others; this could reduce loneliness resulting from social distancing and lockdowns during the COVID-19 crisis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Loneliness, physical activity, and mental health during COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis of depression and anxiety in adults over the age of 50 between 2015 and 2020.

TL;DR: It is shown that experiencing loneliness and decreased physical activity are risk factors for worsening mental health during the pandemic and the need to examine policies which target these potentially modifiable risk factors is highlighted.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of longitudinal risk factors for loneliness in older adults.

TL;DR: In this article, a systematic review aimed to identify, identify, and identify risk factors for loneliness in older adults, and interventions should be based on firm evidence regarding risk factors in that population.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

TL;DR: A framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature reviews.
Journal ArticleDOI

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

TL;DR: The Consort 2010 Statement as discussed by the authors has been used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials and has been updated by Schulz et al. in 2010, based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance

TL;DR: The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task and now the council has updated its guidance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

TL;DR: Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework, to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research.
Related Papers (5)