scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Maintenance versus manipulation in verbal working memory revisited: an fMRI study.

Dick J. Veltman, +2 more
- 01 Feb 2003 - 
- Vol. 18, Iss: 2, pp 247-256
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The data support a functional rather than a neuroanatomical distinction between maintenance and manipulation, given the finding that these tasks differentially activate virtually identical systems.
About
This article is published in NeuroImage.The article was published on 2003-02-01 and is currently open access. It has received 314 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Working memory & Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies

TL;DR: The authors conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of 668 sets of activation coordinates in Talairach space reported in 24 primary studies of n-back task variants manipulating process (location vs. identity monitoring) and content (verbal or nonverbal) of working memory.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Architecture of Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex

TL;DR: Using brain imaging in humans, it is shown that the lateral PFC is organized as a cascade of executive processes from premotor to anterior PFC regions that control behavior according to stimuli, the present perceptual context, and the temporal episode in which stimuli occur, respectively.
Journal ArticleDOI

Large-Scale Network Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-analysis of Resting-State Functional Connectivity.

TL;DR: A meta-analysis of rsFC studies provides an empirical foundation for a neurocognitive model in which network dysfunction underlies core cognitive and affective abnormalities in depression.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions

TL;DR: In this article, a common pattern of activation was observed in the prefrontal, dorsal anterior cingulate, and parietal cortices across executive function domains, supporting the idea that executive functions are supported by a superordinate cognitive control network.
References
More filters
Book

Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain : 3-dimensional proportional system : an approach to cerebral imaging

TL;DR: Direct and Indirect Radiologic Localization Reference System: Basal Brain Line CA-CP Cerebral Structures in Three-Dimensional Space Practical Examples for the Use of the Atlas in Neuroradiologic Examinations Three- Dimensional Atlas of a Human Brain Nomenclature-Abbreviations Anatomic Index Conclusions.
Journal ArticleDOI

The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

TL;DR: A wide variety of data on capacity limits suggesting that the smaller capacity limit in short-term memory tasks is real is brought together and a capacity limit for the focus of attention is proposed.
Book

The prefrontal cortex

TL;DR: The Prefrontal Cortex, Fifth Edition, provides users with a thoroughly updated version of this comprehensive work that has historically served as the classic reference on this part of the brain.
Journal ArticleDOI

The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory.

TL;DR: Comparisons of distribution of cerebral blood flow in these conditions localized the phonological store to the left supramarginal gyrus whereas the subvocal rehearsal system was associated with Broca's area, the first demonstration of the normal anatomy of the components of the 'articulatory loop'.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Maintenance versus manipulation in verbal working memory revisited: an fmri study" ?

In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study the authors used parametric versions of both a prototypical maintenance task ( Sternberg ) and a prototypical manipulation task ( n-letter back task ) in 21 healthy subjects. 

because maintenance load increases primarily during the Sternberg (two to seven items in their version, compared to one to three for the n-back), the authors also expected task by region interactions in left parietal cortex, in view of its putative role in phonological storage. 

Main effects for task load, as well as the results of the conjunction analyses, are reported at P 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons. 

In the present study, load-associated activity in left posterior DLPFC and L VLPFC occurred during both encoding and responding, but significant interaction effects were found in bilateral middle DLPFC for responding encoding. 

In the study by Postle et al. (1999), DLPFC activation during a manipulation task was found in all of their subjects, but only in a minority (two of five) during a maintenance task. 

Axial multislice T2*weighted images were obtained with a gradient-echo planar sequence (TE 60 ms, TR 3.48 s, 64 64 matrix, 32 slices, 3 3-mm in-plane resolution, slice thickness 3 mm with a 1-mm interslice gap), covering the entire brain. 

it has been assumed that VLPFC is primarily responsible for retrieval of information and organization of responses (Stern et al., 2000), this may entail considerable executive demands at higher task loads. 

In these latter two studies, it was concluded that the DLPFC was primarily involved during encoding, either due to changes in encoding strategy at higher task loads, or due to cognitive operations usually associated with complex tasks, such as monitoring the contents of WM, or updating and coordinating multiple memory buffers. 

Common areas for loadrelated activity during encoding and responding were foundto be bilateral DLPFC, L VLPFC, bilateral parietal cortex, motor cortex, and cerebellum (Table 4, left). 

The authors also did not select correct responses post hoc, which, however, the authors felt was justified because the overall error rate was very low. 

it was conceivable that the workload task interactions in favor of the n-back were aspecific, resulting from a steeper increase in task difficulty, rather than a maintenance/manipulation difference. 

the fact that manipulation activated L DLPFC to a greater extent was considered evidence for a processing model of functional specialization within PFC by these authors.