scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Measuring people's trust

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors measured trust and trustworthiness in British society with a newly designed experiment using real monetary rewards and a sample of the British population, finding that about 40% of people were willing to trust a stranger in their experiment, and their trust was rewarded half of the time.
Abstract
Summary. We measure trust and trustworthiness in British society with a newly designed experiment using real monetary rewards and a sample of the British population. The study also asks the typical survey question that aims to measure trust, showing that it does not predict ‘trust’ as measured in the experiment. Overall, about 40% of people were willing to trust a stranger in our experiment, and their trust was rewarded half of the time. Analysis of variation in the trust behaviour in our survey suggests that trusting is more likely if people are older, their financial situation is either ‘comfortable’ or ‘difficult’ compared with ‘doing alright’ or ‘just getting by’, they are a homeowner or they are divorced, separated or never married compared with those who are married or cohabiting. Trustworthiness also is more likely among subjects who are divorced or separated relative to those who are married or cohabiting, and less likely among subjects who perceive their financial situation as ‘just getting by’ or ‘difficult’. We also analyse the effect of attitudes towards risks on trust.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Trust games: A meta-analysis

TL;DR: It is found that subjects send less in trust games conducted in Africa than those in North America, and the amount sent in the game is significantly affected by whether payment is random, and whether play is with a simulated counterpart.
Journal ArticleDOI

Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States

TL;DR: For example, this paper found that people take risks less willingly when the agent of uncertainty is another person rather than nature, and that people's willingness to accept the risky rather than the sure payoff indicates betrayal aversion.
Journal ArticleDOI

Culture and cooperation

TL;DR: Analysis of the data of Herrmann et al. (2008a) finds that culture has a substantial influence on the extent of cooperation, in addition to individual heterogeneity and group-level differences identified by previous research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Distinguishing trust from risk: An anatomy of the investment game

TL;DR: In this paper, the role of risk attitudes in individual investment decisions in risk games but not in corresponding trust games has been investigated, showing that trust decisions are not tightly connected to a person's risk attitudes, and they lend support to the "trust" interpretation of decisions in investment games.
Journal ArticleDOI

Experimental subjects are not different

TL;DR: The effects of being a student and being a volunteer on behavior are examined to suggest that self-selected students are an appropriate subject pool for the study of social behavior.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History

TL;DR: In this article, the authors designed an experiment to study trust and reciprocity in an investment setting and found that observed decisions suggest that reciprocity exists as a basic element of human behavior and that this is accounted for in the trust extended to an anonymous counterpart.
Book

Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction

TL;DR: The first substantial and authoritative effort to close this gap was made by Camerer, who used psychological principles and hundreds of experiments to develop mathematical theories of reciprocity, limited strategizing, and learning, which help predict what real people and companies do in strategic situations as discussed by the authors.

Can We Trust Trust

TL;DR: In this article, the authors try to reconstruct what seem to me the central questions about trust that the individual contributions presented in this volume raise and partly answer, and discuss the extent to which cooperation can come about independently of trust, and also whether trust can be seen as a result rather than a precondition of cooperation.
MonographDOI

Foundations of Human Sociality - Economic Experiments and Ethnographic: Evidence From Fifteen Small-Scale Societies

TL;DR: In this article, the authors measure social norms and preferences using experimental games and find substantial variation among social groups in Bargaining and Public Goods Behavior in an Egalitarian Society of Hunter-Gatherers.
Book ChapterDOI

Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that social distance influences other-regardedness independent of any norms of social exchange, and that when social distance decreases, the "other" is no longer some unknown individual from some anonymous crowd but becomes an identifiable victim.