scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

MR-PheWAS: Hypothesis prioritization among potential causal effects of body mass index on many outcomes, using Mendelian randomization

TLDR
This work demonstrates a novel extension to the phenome-wide association study approach, using automated screening with genotypic instruments to screen for causal associations amongst any number of phenotypic outcomes, and finds novel evidence of effects of BMI on a global self-worth score.
Abstract
Observational cohort studies can provide rich datasets with a diverse range of phenotypic variables. However, hypothesis-driven epidemiological analyses by definition only test particular hypotheses chosen by researchers. Furthermore, observational analyses may not provide robust evidence of causality, as they are susceptible to confounding, reverse causation and measurement error. Using body mass index (BMI) as an exemplar, we demonstrate a novel extension to the phenome-wide association study (pheWAS) approach, using automated screening with genotypic instruments to screen for causal associations amongst any number of phenotypic outcomes. We used a sample of 8,121 children from the ALSPAC dataset, and tested the linear association of a BMI-associated allele score with 172 phenotypic outcomes (with variable sample sizes). We also performed an instrumental variable analysis to estimate the causal effect of BMI on each phenotype. We found 21 of the 172 outcomes were associated with the allele score at an unadjusted p < 0.05 threshold, and use Bonferroni corrections, permutation testing and estimates of the false discovery rate to consider the strength of results given the number of tests performed. The most strongly associated outcomes included leptin, lipid profile, and blood pressure. We also found novel evidence of effects of BMI on a global self-worth score.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome

TL;DR: MR-Base is a platform that integrates a curated database of complete GWAS results (no restrictions according to statistical significance) with an application programming interface, web app and R packages that automate 2SMR, and includes several sensitivity analyses for assessing the impact of horizontal pleiotropy and other violations of assumptions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent Developments in Mendelian Randomization Studies

TL;DR: In conjunction with the growing availability of large-scale genomic databases, higher level of automation and increased robustness of the methods, MR promises to be a valuable strategy to examine causality in complex biological/omics networks, inform drug development and prioritize intervention targets for disease prevention in the future.
Journal ArticleDOI

Genetics of obesity: what genetic association studies have taught us about the biology of obesity and its complications

TL;DR: Gene by environment and lifestyle interaction analyses have revealed that the authors' increasingly obesogenic environment might be amplifying genetic risk for obesity, yet those at highest risk could mitigate this risk by increasing physical activity and possibly by avoiding specific dietary components.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data

TL;DR: Special issues in nephrology are discussed, such as inverse risk factor associations in advanced disease, and opportunities to design Mendelian randomization studies around kidney function and disease are outlined.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice

TL;DR: The principles of the method and how to impute categorical and quantitative variables, including skewed variables, are described and shown and the practical analysis of multiply imputed data is described, including model building and model checking.

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research and suggest that claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research and conclude that the probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientifi c fi eld.
Journal ArticleDOI

No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons.

Kenneth J. Rothman
- 01 Jan 1990 - 
TL;DR: A policy of not making adjustments for multiple comparisons is preferable because it will lead to fewer errors of interpretation when the data under evaluation are not random numbers but actual observations on nature.
Journal ArticleDOI

A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity

TL;DR: A genome-wide search for type 2 diabetes–susceptibility genes identified a common variant in the FTO (fat mass and obesity associated) gene that predisposes to diabetes through an effect on body mass index (BMI).
Related Papers (5)