Optimization of process parameters for electroless Ni–Co–P coating deposition to maximize micro-hardness
read more
Citations
Modelling and optimization of microhardness of electroless Ni–P–TiO2 composite coating based on machine learning approaches and RSM
Synthesis of worm-like binary metallic active material by electroless deposition approach for high-performance supercapacitor
Effects of heat treatment on the properties of Co–P–TiO2 nanocomposite coatings
Prediction and parametric optimization of surface roughness of electroless Ni-Co-P coating using Box-Behnken design
Effect of Rare Earth on the Corrosion Resistance of Electroless Ni-Mo-P Composite Coatings
References
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Electroless nickel, alloy, composite and nano coatings – A critical review
Tribology of electroless nickel coatings – A review
Deposition of nickel and cobalt by chemical reduction
Electroless Nickel Plating – A Review
Related Papers (5)
Influence of Process Parameters on Microhardness of Electroless Ni-B Coatings:
Effect of Process Parameters on Microhardness of Ni-P-Al2O3 Composite Coatings
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. What is the effect of the presence of the smaller atoms in the matrix?
The presence of the smaller atoms in the matrix (phosphorus in this case) induces tensile stress, thus nullifying the stresses and reducing the overall internal stresses within the coating.
Q3. What is the effect of Ni3P phase on the coating?
The presence of the Ni3P phase in the coating increases the hardness of the coating because of the crystalline form and the ability of the crystalline form to withstand more stress before grain deformation than that of the amorphous deposits [36-39].
Q4. What is the effect of the ANOVA on the hardness of the coating?
ANOVA results showed that cobalt sulphate concentration and all the interactions were significant in determining the hardness of the coating.
Q5. What was the process of removing the oxide layer?
After cleaning with distilled water, the substrate was dipped into 3:1 dilute HCl solution for acid pickling in order to remove oxide layer and other foreign metals.
Q6. What was the deviation of the experimental hardness values from the modelling values?
The deviation of the experimental hardness values from the modelling values was in the range of - 3.71% to +3.51%, which was a very minute value.
Q7. How many g/LpH value were used for coating?
2H2O) 15 g/LAmmonium sulphate ((NH4)2SO4) 10 g/LpH value 5Time 1 hourBath volume 250 cm3Bath temperature 80 °C / 85 °C / 90 °CThe coating samples were of dimensions 20.0×15.0×0.1 mm3.
Q8. How much hardness can be achieved with Ni-Co-P coating?
From the experimental data and the optimization process parameters, it can be concluded that 15 g/L of CoSO4.7H2O, 25 g/L of NaH2PO2.H2O and 85 °C bath temperature were the optimum conditions to achieve a Ni-Co-P coating with a microhardness of 1956 HV10g.
Q9. How can the authors predict the micro-hardness of the Ni-Co-P coating?
The developed model can be used to predict micro-hardness of the electroless Ni-Co-P coating in industrial applications without conducting extensive experimental trials.
Q10. What is the effect of the phosphorus atoms in the coating?
the smaller phosphorus atoms present in the Ni-Co-P coating occupies those spaces where compressive stresses are present [40].
Q11. What is the effect of the interaction plot on the micro hardness of the coating?
The interaction plot of ANOVA suggests that the interactions CoSO4.7H2O-Temperature, NaH2PO2.H2O-Temperature and CoSO4.7H2O-NaH2PO2.H2O are very significant in determining the hardness of the optimized coating.
Q12. How much increase in hardness was observed from substrate to asdeposited coated sample?
The percentage increase in hardness from substrate to the asdeposited coated sample was 205% and substrate to the as deposited annealed coated sample was 216%.