scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Optimization of process parameters for electroless Ni–Co–P coating deposition to maximize micro-hardness

TLDR
In this article, the microhardness of electroless Ni-Co-P alloy coating over copper substrate was investigated and three different design factors i.e., the concentration of cobalt sulphate, concentration of sodium hypophosphite and bath temperatures were used as the process parameters which were optimised by using Box Behnken Design (BBD).
Abstract
The present study investigates optimisation of microhardness of electroless Ni–Co–P alloy coating over copper substrate. The microhardness of the coating was significantly higher compared to the substrate. Three different design factors i.e., the concentration of cobalt sulphate, concentration of sodium hypophosphite and bath temperatures were used as the process parameters which were optimised by using Box Behnken Design (BBD) and coating micro hardness was taken as a response factor. Vickers' hardness test was conducted to obtain the micro hardness values of the coated samples. From the model analysis results, it was found 15 g L−1 of cobalt sulphate, 25 g L−1 of sodium hypophosphite and a bath temperature of 85 °C were the optimum conditions for the coating deposition in order to obtain the hardness value of 1921 HV10g. After annealing at 350 °C the hardness value was further enhanced to 1990 HV10g. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to find the graphical relationship between the different process parameters. The detail surface morphology of the Ni–Co–P coating was studied by using an optical microscope and a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The phase and elemental compositions were determined by x-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis and Energy Dispersive x-ray analysis (EDX).

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Sarkar, Subhasish, Baranwal, Rishav Kumar, Biswas, Chanchal, Majumdar,
Gautam and Haider, Julfikar (2019) Optimization of process parameters for
electroless Ni–Co–P coating deposition to maximize micro-hardness. Mate-
rials Research Express, 6 (4). ISSN 2053-1591
Downloaded from:
https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/622314/
Version: Accepted Version
Publisher: IOP Publishing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aafc47
Please cite the published version
https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk

Optimization of process parameters for Electroless Ni-Co-P Coating
deposition to maximize Micro-hardness
1
Subhasish Sarkar,
1*
Rishav Kumar Baranwal,
2
Chanchal Biswas,
1
Gautam Majumdar,
3
Julfikar Haider
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032, India
2
Deartment of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-
700032, India
3
Division of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan
University, Manchester, United Kingdom
*corresponding author
ABSTRACT
The present study investigates optimisation of microhardness of electroless Ni-Co-P alloy
coating over copper substrate. The microhardness of the coating was significantly higher
compared to the substrate. Three different design factors i.e., the concentration of cobalt
sulphate, concentration of sodium hypophosphite and bath temperatures were used as the
process parameters which were optimised by using Box Behnken Design (BBD) and coating
micro hardness was taken as a response factor. Vickers hardness test was conducted to obtain
the micro hardness values of the coated samples. From the model analysis results, it was found
15 g/L of cobalt sulphate, 25 g/L of sodium hypophosphite and a bath temperature of 85 °C
were the optimum conditions for the coating deposition in order to obtain the hardness value
of 1921 HV
10g
. After annealing at 350 °C the hardness value was further enhanced to 1990
HV
10g
. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to find the graphical relationship
between the different process parameters. The detail surface morphology of the Ni-Co-P
coating was studied by using an optical microscope and a Scanning Electron Microscope
(SEM). The phase and elemental compositions were determined by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
analysis and Energy Dispersive X-Ray analysis (EDX).
KEYWORDS

electroless coating, Ni-Co-P, Microardness, Box Behnken Design (BBD), ANOVA,
Optimisation
1. INTRODUCTION
The electroless nickel coatings were first developed by Brenner and Riddell [1] in 1947. In this
coating deposition technique, electron is supplied by a reducing agent instead of electric
current, hence the name electroless. The technique is an autocatalytic process in which the
substrate is immersed in a solution, the electroless bath, which contains the source of metal
ions, reducing agent, bath stabilizer, complexing agent, buffering agent, accelerators, and
surfactants or wetting reagents. Nowadays, electroless nickel coating is widely used in many
industries [2-4] due to its improved corrosion resistance, wear resistance, magnetic and
hardness properties [5-11]. The coating has attracted much attention due to its application in
the fields of engineering, surface science, and purification technology used in automotive,
chemical and petroleum industries, electronics, food, marine, material handling,
pharmaceutical, military, mining, etc. [30]. NiCo-P alloy coatings are of huge importance, as
they possess high-temperature wear and corrosion resistance characteristics. Moreover, the Ni
Co-P alloy deposition is an anomalous co-deposition and the hardness of alloy increases as
long as they possess FCC lattice structure [31]. There are a wide variety of electroless coatings,
which can be broadly classified into four categories viz., pure nickel, alloy and poly-alloy
coatings, composite coatings and electroless nano coatings. The alloy and poly-alloy coatings
can be further classified into binary, ternary and quaternary alloy coatings [12]. In binary
alloys, there are two elements in the coating deposition existing in different phases. s. Similarly,
in ternary, there are three elements present and in quaternary, there are four elements present
[13]. In ternary alloys, an additional element is added to the binary alloys to create a composite
or an alloy coating. Literature review suggests that binary coatings like Ni-P and Ni-B has
proved to have better tribological and mechanical properties [14-18]. However, the need of
having better properties is always a demand in this era and challenging to the researchers at the
same time. Hence, the use of a third element/complex like Co, TiO
2
, W, Cu, Fe, ZrO
2
, Al
2
O
3
,
PTFE, etc. [19-26] is preferred in many cases. Ni-Co-P coating is obtained when cobalt is
introduced as an additional element, in order to incorporate the property of electromagnetic
shielding, and to improve the anti-corrosion and hardness properties of the surface at the same
time [27-29, 43].

The present study focuses on synthesis of Ni-Co-P for increasing the hardness properties of
copper substrate and also to find the optimum conditions for obtaining optimized hardness
value of the coating. Vickers Hardness Test was used to determine the micro-hardness values
of the as-deposited coating. Box Behnken Design (BBD) helped determining the optimum
processing conditions. The BBD modelling suggested 17 model values which when compared
to the experimental values showed a very slight deviation. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
was conducted to find out the significant coating deposition parameters and their interactions
affecting the hardness of the coating.
2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
2.1. Procedure of Synthesis of the Coating
2.1.1. Substrate Preparation
The substrate material chosen for this experiment was copper, as it is a very readily used
material in day-to-day life and has very common but good applications in real life scenarios.
The copper substrate was cut from a foil (99.0% pure, lobachemie) which was present in the
rolled form. In this experiment, Ni-Co-P coating was deposited on copper substrates of size
20.0×15.0×0.1 mm
3
. After cleaning with distilled water, the substrate was dipped into 3:1 dilute
HCl solution for acid pickling in order to remove oxide layer and other foreign metals. Pickling
was carried out for 10 minutes followed by cleaning with distilled water. The surfaces of the
substrates were activated using palladium chloride solution for 10-15 seconds, which was pre-
heated to 55
o
C. Finally, the substrate was prepared for dipping into electroless bath.
2.1.2. Bath preparation
In bath preparation at first NiSO
4
.6H
2
O, CoSO
4
. 7H
2
O, NaH
2
PO
2
. H
2
O, Na
3
C
6
H
5
O
7
. 2H
2
O and
(NH
4
)
2
SO
4
were taken according to Table 1. The pH Value was maintained at 5. Once the
composition was prepared then the substrates were dipped in the electroless bath. Pre-prepared
substrates were kept immersed in the bath for an hour to allow the coating to be deposited.
After that, the substrates coated with Ni-Co-P were taken out of the bath and rinsed in distilled
water. The coating depositions were carried out with different bath compositions and
temperatures along with a fixed time, bath volume and pH value. The composition of the bath
is given in Table 1.
Table 1: Bath Composition for Ni-Co-P electroless coating deposition

Bath composition
Quantity
Nickel sulphate (NiSO
4
. 6H
2
O)
25 g/L
Cobalt sulphate (CoSO
4.
7H
2
O)
10/15/20 g/L
Sodium hypophosphite (NaH
2
PO
2
. H
2
O)
20/25/30 g/L
Tri-sodium citrate dihydrate (Na
3
C
6
H
5
O
7
. 2H
2
O)
15 g/L
Ammonium sulphate ((NH
4
)
2
SO
4
)
10 g/L
pH value
5
Time
1 hour
Bath volume
250 cm
3
Bath temperature
80 °C / 85 °C / 90 °C
2.2. Experimental procedure of Micro-Hardness measurement
The coating samples were of dimensions 20.0×15.0×0.1 mm
3
. Holding a small piece as such
will be difficult in order to perform the hardness test using indentation technique. As a result,
the mounting of the coated samples were done using Bakelite as the thermosetting resin. The
mounting process was carried out at a temperature and pressure of 175 °C and 240 bar,
respectively for 5 minutes. The mounted coated samples underwent Vickers Hardness test
aided by an indenter having a diamond tip of 136°. A 10 gram load was applied, and the total
time for loading and unloading was allowed to be 15 seconds. Indentation surface area (A) and
hardness number (HV) can be calculated by Equation (1) and (2) respectively. The Vickers
microhardness Ni-Co-P coated mounted samples were measured as per ASTM standard E384-
16 using a hardness tester.
A =



(1)

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Modelling and optimization of microhardness of electroless Ni–P–TiO2 composite coating based on machine learning approaches and RSM

TL;DR: The extra trees (ET) model showed outstanding performance amongst the five models for training, testing, and overall datasets with coefficient of correlation (R2), MSE and MAE value of 94.47, 75.38 and 4.67, respectively, and is recommended in the prediction of microhardness of electroless Ni-P-TiO2 composite coating.
Journal ArticleDOI

Synthesis of worm-like binary metallic active material by electroless deposition approach for high-performance supercapacitor

TL;DR: In this article, the facilely eco-friendly electroless electrolytic (EE) technique was employed to deposit a worm-like Ni-Co-P nanofilm directly on nickel foam (NF) substrate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of heat treatment on the properties of Co–P–TiO2 nanocomposite coatings

TL;DR: In this paper, the effects of heat treatment on the properties of electrodeposited Co-P-TiO2 nanocomposite coatings were systematically investigated, and the TiO2 nanoparticles-reinforced co-p-tiO2-nanocomposites wer...
Journal ArticleDOI

Prediction and parametric optimization of surface roughness of electroless Ni-Co-P coating using Box-Behnken design

TL;DR: In this paper, the parametric optimization of electroless Ni-Co-P coating considering surface roughness as a response using Box-Behnken Design (BBD) of experiment was performed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Rare Earth on the Corrosion Resistance of Electroless Ni-Mo-P Composite Coatings

TL;DR: In this article , a kind of corrosion-resistant Ni-Mo-P composite coating was deposited on the surface of AZ91D magnesium alloy substrate by electroless plating method with different concentration of Ce(NO3)3 and Nd(NO 3)3.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

Douglas G. Altman, +1 more
- 19 Aug 1995 - 
TL;DR: It is wrong and unwise to interpret so many negative trials as providing evidence of the ineffectiveness of new treatments, and one must seriously question whether the absence of evidence is a valid justification for inaction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Electroless nickel, alloy, composite and nano coatings – A critical review

TL;DR: The development of metal deposition processes based on electroless nickel, alloy and composite coatings on various surfaces has witnessed a surge in interest among researchers, with many recent applications made possible from many excellent properties as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tribology of electroless nickel coatings – A review

TL;DR: In this article, the authors reviewed the tribological advancement of different electroless nickel coatings based on the bath types, structure and also the tribo testing parameters in recent years.
Journal ArticleDOI

Deposition of nickel and cobalt by chemical reduction

TL;DR: In this paper, a process was developed for deposing nickel and cobalt from hot solut ions of hypophosphite with the use of curren-t and specific pretreatm ents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Electroless Nickel Plating – A Review

TL;DR: In this article, a review of the electroless nickel plating of mild steel is presented, focusing on the past and the present published research in this field, both past and present published literature information, both of the past literature information and current published research.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

The present study investigates optimisation of microhardness of electroless Ni-Co-P alloy coating over copper substrate. The detail surface morphology of the Ni-Co-P coating was studied by using an optical microscope and a Scanning Electron Microscope ( SEM ). After annealing at 350 °C the hardness value was further enhanced to 1990 HV10g. 

The presence of the smaller atoms in the matrix (phosphorus in this case) induces tensile stress, thus nullifying the stresses and reducing the overall internal stresses within the coating. 

The presence of the Ni3P phase in the coating increases the hardness of the coating because of the crystalline form and the ability of the crystalline form to withstand more stress before grain deformation than that of the amorphous deposits [36-39]. 

ANOVA results showed that cobalt sulphate concentration and all the interactions were significant in determining the hardness of the coating. 

After cleaning with distilled water, the substrate was dipped into 3:1 dilute HCl solution for acid pickling in order to remove oxide layer and other foreign metals. 

The deviation of the experimental hardness values from the modelling values was in the range of - 3.71% to +3.51%, which was a very minute value. 

2H2O) 15 g/LAmmonium sulphate ((NH4)2SO4) 10 g/LpH value 5Time 1 hourBath volume 250 cm3Bath temperature 80 °C / 85 °C / 90 °CThe coating samples were of dimensions 20.0×15.0×0.1 mm3. 

From the experimental data and the optimization process parameters, it can be concluded that 15 g/L of CoSO4.7H2O, 25 g/L of NaH2PO2.H2O and 85 °C bath temperature were the optimum conditions to achieve a Ni-Co-P coating with a microhardness of 1956 HV10g. 

The developed model can be used to predict micro-hardness of the electroless Ni-Co-P coating in industrial applications without conducting extensive experimental trials. 

the smaller phosphorus atoms present in the Ni-Co-P coating occupies those spaces where compressive stresses are present [40]. 

The interaction plot of ANOVA suggests that the interactions CoSO4.7H2O-Temperature, NaH2PO2.H2O-Temperature and CoSO4.7H2O-NaH2PO2.H2O are very significant in determining the hardness of the optimized coating. 

The percentage increase in hardness from substrate to the asdeposited coated sample was 205% and substrate to the as deposited annealed coated sample was 216%.