scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n+1 and n+2 previews simultaneously

TLDR
The boundary paradigm with a novel preview manipulation was used to examine the extent of parafoveal processing of words to the right of fixation and found that there was no evidence for a preview benefit for word n+2 and no Evidence for parafovesal-on-foveal effects when word n-1 is at least four letters long.
Abstract
The boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) with a novel preview manipulation was used to examine the extent of parafoveal processing of words to the right of fixation. Words n + 1 and n + 2 had either correct or incorrect previews prior to fixation (prior to crossing the boundary location). In addition, the manipulation utilized either a high or low frequency word in word n + 1 location on the assumption that it would be more likely that n + 2 preview effects could be obtained when word n + 1 was high frequency. The primary findings were that there was no evidence for a preview benefit for word n + 2 and no evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects when word n + 1 is at least four letters long. We discuss implications for models of eye-movement control in reading.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.

TL;DR: Research on the following topics is reviewed with respect to reading: (a) the perceptual span, (or span of effective vision), (b) preview benefit, (c) eye movement control, and (d) models of eye movements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parafoveal processing in reading.

TL;DR: Research investigating how words are identified parafoveally (and foveally) in reading is summarized, and the extent to which words are processed at each of the levels of representation is summarized.
Journal ArticleDOI

Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

TL;DR: In this article, the role of models and data in further understanding the reading process is considered, and the differences between the E-Z Reader model and SWIFT model are reviewed, as are benchmark data that need to be accounted for by any model of eye movement control.
Journal ArticleDOI

Eye movements in reading: some theoretical context.

TL;DR: An overview of major developments over the last decade and a description of two newly emerging trends in the field: the study of continuous reading in non-Roman writing systems and the broadening of the scope of research to encompass individual differences and developmental issues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Eye movements and display change detection during reading.

TL;DR: Results indicate that sensitivity to display changes was related to how close the eyes were to the invalid preview on the fixation prior to the display change, as well as the timing of the completion of this change relative to the start of the post-change fixation.
References
More filters
Book

Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

TL;DR: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models is a comprehensive manual for the applied researcher who wants to perform data analysis using linear and nonlinear regression and multilevel models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

TL;DR: The basic theme of the review is that eye movement data reflect moment-to-moment cognitive processes in the various tasks examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.

TL;DR: In this paper, a computer-based eye-movement controlled display system was developed for the study of perceptual processes in reading, which was used to identify the region from which skilled readers pick up various types of visual information during a fixation while reading.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

TL;DR: The E-Z Reader model as mentioned in this paper ) is a general model of eye movement control in reading that relates cognitive processing (specifically aspects of lexical access) to eye movements in reading.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Perceptual Span and Peripheral Cues in Reading.

TL;DR: It was found that a reader was able to make a semantic interpretation of a word that began 1–6 character spaces from his fixation point, and the size of the area from which he does is rather small, suggesting that the skilled reader is able to take advantage of information in the periphery.
Related Papers (5)