Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures
Jennifer Sandoval,Julie Lucero,John G. Oetzel,Magdalena Avila,Lorenda Belone,Marjorie K. Mau,Cynthia R. Pearson,Greg Tafoya,Bonnie Duran,Lisbeth Iglesias Rios,Nina Wallerstein +10 more
TLDR
This article seeks to identify instruments and measures in a comprehensive literature review that relates to these distinct components of the CBPR model and to present them in an organized and indexed format for researcher use.Abstract:
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has been widely used in public health research in the last decade as an approach to develop culturally centered interventions and collaborative research processes in which communities are directly involved in the construction and implementation of these interventions and in other application of findings. Little is known, however, about CBPR pathways of change and how these academic–community collaborations may contribute to successful outcomes. A new health CBPR conceptual model (Wallerstein N, Oetzel JG, Duran B et al. CBPR: What predicts outcomes? In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N (eds). Communication Based Participatory Research, 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Co., 2008) suggests that relationships between four components: context, group dynamics, the extent of community-centeredness in intervention and/or research design and the impact of these participatory processes on CBPR system change and health outcomes. This article seeks to identify instruments and measures in a comprehensive literature review that relates to these distinct components of the CBPR model and to present them in an organized and indexed format for researcherread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects
Justin Jagosh,Paula L. Bush,Jon Salsberg,Ann C. Macaulay,Trisha Greenhalgh,Geoff Wong,Margaret Cargo,Lawrence W. Green,Carol P. Herbert,Pierre Pluye +9 more
TL;DR: S sustaining CBPR and achieving unanticipated benefits likely depend on trust-related mechanisms and a continuing commitment to power-sharing, which have implications for building successful CBPR partnerships to address challenging public health problems and the complex assessment of outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice
TL;DR: This assessment provides explicit guidance for better alignment of engagement's promised benefits with evaluation efforts and identifies specific areas for development of evaluative measures and better reporting processes.
Assessing the Evidence
TL;DR: It is shown that when students embark on research they first have to learn methodology, and that when they write up that research they should start by explaining their methodology.
Journal ArticleDOI
Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity
Lorenda Belone,Julie Lucero,Bonnie Duran,Greg Tafoya,Elizabeth A. Baker,Domin Chan,Charlotte Chang,Ella Greene-Moton,Michele A. Kelley,Nina Wallerstein +9 more
TL;DR: A national community-based participatory research team developed a conceptual model of CBPR partnerships to understand the contribution of partnership processes to improved community capacity and health outcomes and found community face validity and capacity to adapt the model to diverse contexts.
Journal ArticleDOI
Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools
Antoine Boivin,Audrey L’Espérance,François-Pierre Gauvin,Vincent Dumez,Ann C. Macaulay,Pascale Lehoux,Julia Abelson +6 more
TL;DR: Reviews looking at evaluation tools for patient engagement in individual decision making do exist, but no similar articles in research and health systems have been published.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature.
TL;DR: The authors call for applied research to better understand service delivery processes and contextual factors to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of program implementation at local state and national levels.
Book
Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a survey on dimensionality, reliability, and validity of Latent Constructs in the context of scale development in the social sciences, focusing on the dimensionality of construct, items, and a set of items.
Related Papers (5)
Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity
Nina Wallerstein,Bonnie Duran +1 more