Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The author discusses the pros and cons of implementing an enterprise system, showing how a system can produce unintended and highly disruptive consequences and cautions against shifting responsibility for its adoption to technologists.Abstract:
Enterprise systems present a new model of corporate computing. They allow companies to replace their existing information systems, which are often incompatible with one another, with a single, integrated system. By streamlining data flows throughout an organization, these commercial software packages, offered by vendors like SAP, promise dramatic gains in a company's efficiency and bottom line. It's no wonder that businesses are rushing to jump on the ES bandwagon. But while these systems offer tremendous rewards, the risks they carry are equally great. Not only are the systems expensive and difficult to implement, they can also tie the hands of managers. Unlike computer systems of the past, which were typically developed in-house with a company's specific requirements in mind, enterprise systems are off-the-shelf solutions. They impose their own logic on a company's strategy, culture, and organization, often forcing companies to change the way they do business. Managers would do well to heed the horror stories of failed implementations. FoxMeyer Drug, for example, claims that its system helped drive it into bankruptcy. Drawing on examples of both successful and unsuccessful ES projects, the author discusses the pros and cons of implementing an enterprise system, showing how a system can produce unintended and highly disruptive consequences. Because of an ES's profound business implications, he cautions against shifting responsibility for its adoption to technologists. Only a general manager will be able to mediate between the imperatives of the system and the imperatives of the business.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
What makes the competitive contribution of ERP strategic
Arik Ragowsky,David Gefen +1 more
TL;DR: The results, supporting Nolan and McFarlan (2005), show that while some ERP systems provide strategic advantage to some companies,ERP systems may not necessarily provide similar advantage to other companies due to the specific operational characteristics of each company and the way the ERP is used.
Journal ArticleDOI
Model-based software configuration: patterns and languages
Alexander Dreiling,Michael Rosemann,Wil M. P. van der Aalst,Wil M. P. van der Aalst,Lutz Heuser,Karsten Schulz +5 more
TL;DR: This paper proposes a new approach based on configurable process models, which reflect ES functionalities, and provides a taxonomy of situations that can occur from a business perspective during process model configuration via so-called semantic configuration patterns.
Journal ArticleDOI
Integrating Information Technology into Accounting Research and Practice
Guido L. Geerts,Lynford E. Graham,Elaine G. Mauldin,William E. McCarthy,Vernon J. Richardson +4 more
TL;DR: This commentary applies an organizing information systems research framework to accounting to demonstrate how design science, archival, and behavioral research paradigms work together to advance theory and inform practice.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Identifying critical success factors of ERP systems at the higher education sector
TL;DR: This paper identifies, previously reported, critical success factors (CSFs) in relation to ERP system implementations and discusses the importance of these factors.
Journal ArticleDOI
An integrated reference model for production planning and control in SMEs
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify the general requirements and guidelines for the definition of an integrated model of the order to delivery cycle in a VM environment, which can particularly be suitable for the small-medium enterprise needs.