Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The author discusses the pros and cons of implementing an enterprise system, showing how a system can produce unintended and highly disruptive consequences and cautions against shifting responsibility for its adoption to technologists.Abstract:
Enterprise systems present a new model of corporate computing. They allow companies to replace their existing information systems, which are often incompatible with one another, with a single, integrated system. By streamlining data flows throughout an organization, these commercial software packages, offered by vendors like SAP, promise dramatic gains in a company's efficiency and bottom line. It's no wonder that businesses are rushing to jump on the ES bandwagon. But while these systems offer tremendous rewards, the risks they carry are equally great. Not only are the systems expensive and difficult to implement, they can also tie the hands of managers. Unlike computer systems of the past, which were typically developed in-house with a company's specific requirements in mind, enterprise systems are off-the-shelf solutions. They impose their own logic on a company's strategy, culture, and organization, often forcing companies to change the way they do business. Managers would do well to heed the horror stories of failed implementations. FoxMeyer Drug, for example, claims that its system helped drive it into bankruptcy. Drawing on examples of both successful and unsuccessful ES projects, the author discusses the pros and cons of implementing an enterprise system, showing how a system can produce unintended and highly disruptive consequences. Because of an ES's profound business implications, he cautions against shifting responsibility for its adoption to technologists. Only a general manager will be able to mediate between the imperatives of the system and the imperatives of the business.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Enterprise Resource Planning, Operations and Management: Enabling and Constraining ERP and the Role of the Production and Operations Manager
Kim Sundtoft Hald,Jan Mouritsen +1 more
TL;DR: Based on the identified effects of ERP, the paper speculates on the managerial tasks of the production and operations manager (POM) in an ERP environment and lists a set of central concerns of potential relevance to POM and to future research.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Planning for 'drift'?: implementation process of enterprise resource planning systems
TL;DR: It is argued that the process of technology-related change may be seen as a form of a 'drift' involving a series of purposeful actions with unplanned outcomes as an ongoing process of project life.
Human, contextual, and processual issues influencing enterprise system use
TL;DR: The findings from the first site show that ES-use evolves in a virtuous continuous improvement cycle, and human, contextual and processual issues define the way as the use of the system evolves over time.
Journal ArticleDOI
Risk factors of enterprise internal control under the internet of things governance: A qualitative research approach
TL;DR: The critical risk factors that influence the governance of enterprise internal control in an IoT environment are defined and classified based on the three-layer DCM architecture for mapping with various perceptions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Chief financial officer (CFO) characteristics and ERP system adoption: An upper-echelons perspective
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the relationship between characteristics of chief financial officers (CFOs) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) system adoption, and found that firms with less educated CFOs more often adopted an ERP system, and that the relationship was not moderated by the CFO being responsible for IT.