RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
TLDR
This project used multiple sources to develop and draw together evidence and expertise in realist synthesis and hopes that these standards will act as a resource that will contribute to improving the reporting of realist syntheses.Abstract:
Background: There is growing interest in realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example, by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. No previous publication standards exist for reporting realist syntheses. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. The project’s aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for realist systematic reviews. Methods: We (a) collated and summarized existing literature on the principles of good practice in realist syntheses; (b) considered the extent to which these principles had been followed by published syntheses, thereby identifying how rigor may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; (c) used a three-round online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of national and international experts in evidence synthesis, realist research, policy and/or publishing to produce and iteratively refine a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; (d) provided real-time support to ongoing realist syntheses and the open-access RAMESES online discussion list so as to capture problems and questions as they arose; and (e) synthesized expert input, evidence syntheses and real-time problem analysis into a definitive set of standards. Results: We identified 35 published realist syntheses, provided real-time support to 9 on-going syntheses and captured questions raised in the RAMESES discussion list. Through analysis and discussion within the project team, we summarized the published literature and common questions and challenges into briefing materials for the Delphi panel, comprising 37 members. Within three rounds this panel had reached consensus on 19 key publication standards, with an overall response rate of 91%. Conclusion: This project used multiple sources to develop and draw together evidence and expertise in realist synthesis. For each item we have included an explanation for why it is important and guidance on how it might be reported. Realist synthesis is a relatively new method for evidence synthesis and as experience and methodological developments occur, we anticipate that these standards will evolve to reflect further methodological developments. We hope that these standards will act as a resource that will contribute to improving the reporting of realist syntheses. To encourage dissemination of the RAMESES publication standards, this article is co-published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing and is freely accessible on Wiley Online Library (http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jan). Please see related article http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/20 and http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1741-7015/11/22read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes: a realist review
Massirfufulay Kpehe Musa,Gizdem Akdur,Sarah Brady,Anne Killett,Karen Spilsbury,Guy Peryer,Jennifer K Burton,Adam L. Gordon,Barbara Hanratty,Ann-Marie Towers,Lisa Irvine,Sarah Kelly,Liz Jones,Julienne Meyer,Claire Goodman +14 more
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors developed a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff can effectively implement and use minimum data sets (MDS) to plan and deliver care for residents.
Journal ArticleDOI
Nursing students' first experience of death: Identifying mechanisms for practice learning. A realist review.
Núria Gorchs-Font,Anna Ramon-Aribau,Meltem Yildirim,Thilo Kroll,Philip Larkin,Mireia Subirana-Casacuberta +5 more
TL;DR: The student nurse receives contradictory messages during the first experience of facing the death of a patient under their care, and specific indicators should be developed to track and guarantee and the optimal achievement of required competencies.
Journal ArticleDOI
Implementing civic engagement within mental health services in South East Asia: a systematic review and realist synthesis of current evidence
Karen James,Helen Brooks,Herni Susanti,Jessica Waddingham,Irman Irmansyah,Budi Anna Keliat,Bagus Sediadi Bandol Utomo,Diana Rose,Erminia Colucci,Karina Lovell +9 more
TL;DR: A realist synthesis and systematic review of peer reviewed publications and grey literature is completed to identify the context and actions which promote successful implementation of CE approaches in SEA, and illustrates how CE interventions can be successfully implemented in SEA.
Journal ArticleDOI
Oral health interventions for people living with mental disorders: protocol for a realist systematic review
Amanda Kenny,Virginia Dickson-Swift,Mark Gussy,Susan Kidd,Dianne Cox,Mohd Masood,David Azul,Carina Chan,Bradley Christian,Jacqui Theobold,Brad Hodge,R. J. M. Knevel,Carol McKinstry,Danielle Couch,Nerida Hyett,Prabhakar Veginadu,Nastaran Doroud +16 more
TL;DR: This realist systematic review is the first review to take a realist approach to explore the broad scope of causal factors that impact on the success or failure of oral health interventions for people with mental disorders.
Journal ArticleDOI
Supervision training interventions in the health and human services: realist synthesis protocol.
Sarah Lee,Charlotte Denniston,Vicki Edouard,Claire Palermo,Kirsty Pope,Keith Sutton,Susan Waller,Bernadette Ward,Charlotte E. Rees +8 more
TL;DR: The realist synthesis will propose an evidence-informed theory of supervision training interventions (ie, what interventions work for whom and why) and the research will be used by educators to develop evidenced-based supervisionTraining interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +10 more
TL;DR: An Explanation and Elaboration of the PRISMA Statement is presented and updated guidelines for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati,Douglas G. Altman,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Peter C Gøtzsche,John P. A. Ioannidis,Mike Clarke,Philip J. Devereaux,Jos Kleijnen,David Moher +9 more
TL;DR: The meaning and rationale for each checklist item is explained, and an example of good reporting is included and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are included.
Journal ArticleDOI
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
David Moher,Sally Hopewell,Kenneth F. Schulz,Victor M. Montori,Peter C Gøtzsche,Philip J. Devereaux,Diana Elbourne,Matthias Egger,Douglas G. Altman +8 more
TL;DR: This update of the CONSORT statement improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias.
Journal ArticleDOI
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
Melissa C. Brouwers,Michelle E. Kho,George P. Browman,Jako S. Burgers,Francoise Cluzeau,Gene Feder,Béatrice Fervers,Ian D. Graham,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Steven E. Hanna,Peter Littlejohns,Julie Makarski,Louise Zitzelsberger +12 more
TL;DR: A strategy was needed to differentiate among guidelines and ensure that those guidelines that vary widely in quality are distinguished.
Journal ArticleDOI
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
TL;DR: A model of research synthesis designed to work with complex social interventions or programmes, and which is based on the emerging ‘realist’ approach to evaluation is offered, to enable decision-makers to reach a deeper understanding of the intervention and how it can be made to work most effectively.