scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The authors presented new demographic data about the Mechanical Turk subject population, reviewed the strengths of Mechanical Turk relative to other online and offline methods of recruiting subjects, and compared the magnitude of effects obtained using Mechanical Turk and traditional subject pools.
Abstract
Although Mechanical Turk has recently become popular among social scientists as a source of experimental data, doubts may linger about the quality of data provided by subjects recruited from online labor markets. We address these potential concerns by presenting new demographic data about the Mechanical Turk subject population, reviewing the strengths of Mechanical Turk relative to other online and offline methods of recruiting subjects, and comparing the magnitude of effects obtained using Mechanical Turk and traditional subject pools. We further discuss some additional benefits such as the possibility of longitudinal, cross cultural and prescreening designs, and offer some advice on how to best manage a common subject pool.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Crowdsourcing Awareness: Exploration of the Ovarian Cancer Knowledge Gap through Amazon Mechanical Turk

TL;DR: The relatively poor public knowledge of ovarian cancer among the US population was confirmed and the simple, yet novel design should set an example for designing surveys to obtain quality data via Amazon Mechanical Turk with the associated analyses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevailing Public Perceptions of the Ethics of Gene Therapy

TL;DR: The findings suggest that the acceptability of gene therapy is increasing and that this trend is occurring despite lingering concerns over ethical issues, as well as comparing these data with those from the 1990s.
Journal ArticleDOI

Even arbitrary norms influence moral decision-making.

TL;DR: It is shown that people conform to social norms, even when they understand that the norms in question are arbitrary and do not reflect people’s actual preferences, suggesting that prominent, rationality-based explanations of norm effects cannot explain these results.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reliability of a new measure to assess modern screen time in adults

TL;DR: Results from this study suggest this self-administered questionnaire may be used to successfully classify individuals into different categories of screen time use (e.g. high vs. low); however, it is likely that objective measures are needed to increase precision ofScreen time assessment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Conducting Field Experiments Using eLancing’s Natural Environment

TL;DR: In this paper, the use of eLancing as a natural environment to conduct field experiments in entrepreneurship research is proposed, which involves millions of people around the world in Internet freelancing.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

TL;DR: The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed in different ways.
Journal ArticleDOI

Amazon's Mechanical Turk A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

TL;DR: Findings indicate that MTurk can be used to obtain high-quality data inexpensively and rapidly and the data obtained are at least as reliable as those obtained via traditional methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on some of the qualities peculiar to psychological experiments and point out that the demand characteristics perceived in any particular experiment will vary with the sophistication, intelligence, and previous experience of each experimental subject.
Journal ArticleDOI

Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.

TL;DR: The conjunction rule as mentioned in this paper states that the probability of a conjunction cannot exceed the probabilities of its constituents, P (A) and P (B), because the extension (or the possibility set) of the conjunction is included in the extension of their constituents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires.

TL;DR: Internet data collection methods, with a focus on self-report questionnaires from self-selected samples, are evaluated and compared with traditional paper-and-pencil methods and it is concluded that Internet methods can contribute to many areas of psychology.
Related Papers (5)