scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The authors presented new demographic data about the Mechanical Turk subject population, reviewed the strengths of Mechanical Turk relative to other online and offline methods of recruiting subjects, and compared the magnitude of effects obtained using Mechanical Turk and traditional subject pools.
Abstract
Although Mechanical Turk has recently become popular among social scientists as a source of experimental data, doubts may linger about the quality of data provided by subjects recruited from online labor markets. We address these potential concerns by presenting new demographic data about the Mechanical Turk subject population, reviewing the strengths of Mechanical Turk relative to other online and offline methods of recruiting subjects, and comparing the magnitude of effects obtained using Mechanical Turk and traditional subject pools. We further discuss some additional benefits such as the possibility of longitudinal, cross cultural and prescreening designs, and offer some advice on how to best manage a common subject pool.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How (not) to Incent Crowd Workers - Payment Schemes and Feedback in Crowdsourcing

TL;DR: Data suggests that on average dyadic tournaments do not improve performance compared to a simple piece rate for simple and short crowdsourcing tasks, and giving feedback on the competitive position in such tournaments tends to be negatively related to workers’ performance.
Posted Content

Maximizing as a predictor of job satisfaction and performance: A tale of three scales

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the utility of the three most widely used measures of maximizing in predicting several criteria of interest to organizational researchers: job satisfaction, intentions to quit the organization, performance in the job role, and income.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Fruitful Feedback: Positive Affective Language and Source Anonymity Improve Critique Reception and Work Outcomes

TL;DR: It is found that critiques with positive affec-tive language increased positive emotions and reduced participants' annoyance and frustration, which led to an increase in work quality, compared to critiques without positive language.
Journal ArticleDOI

Light Bulbs or Seeds? How Metaphors for Ideas Influence Judgments About Genius:

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined how these metaphors may shape beliefs about ideas and beliefs about the seeds of an idea and how they may influence beliefs about a bright idea appearing like a "light bulb" or "seed" of a seed.
Proceedings Article

Quality expectation-variance tradeoffs in crowdsourcing contests

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors theoretically analyze tradeoffs between the expectation and variance of the principal's utility, and empirically test their theoretical predictions using a controlled experiment on Amazon Mechanical Turk.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

TL;DR: The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed in different ways.
Journal ArticleDOI

Amazon's Mechanical Turk A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

TL;DR: Findings indicate that MTurk can be used to obtain high-quality data inexpensively and rapidly and the data obtained are at least as reliable as those obtained via traditional methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on some of the qualities peculiar to psychological experiments and point out that the demand characteristics perceived in any particular experiment will vary with the sophistication, intelligence, and previous experience of each experimental subject.
Journal ArticleDOI

Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.

TL;DR: The conjunction rule as mentioned in this paper states that the probability of a conjunction cannot exceed the probabilities of its constituents, P (A) and P (B), because the extension (or the possibility set) of the conjunction is included in the extension of their constituents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires.

TL;DR: Internet data collection methods, with a focus on self-report questionnaires from self-selected samples, are evaluated and compared with traditional paper-and-pencil methods and it is concluded that Internet methods can contribute to many areas of psychology.
Related Papers (5)