Strength prediction for bi-axial braided composites by a multi-scale modelling approach
read more
Citations
Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: a review
A novel interface constitutive model for prediction of stiffness and strength in 3D braided composites
A multi-scale modeling framework for impact damage simulation of triaxially braided composites
Comparison of periodic mesh and free mesh on the mechanical properties prediction of 3D braided composites
Microscale finite element analysis for predicting effects of air voids on mechanical properties of single fiber bundle in composites
References
A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications
Meso-FE modelling of textile composites: Road map, data flow and algorithms
Mechanics of Composite Materials: Past, Present, and Future
Multiscale modeling of composite materials: a roadmap towards virtual testing
Related Papers (5)
Progressive damage and nonlinear analysis of 3D four-directional braided composites under unidirectional tension
Frequently Asked Questions (18)
Q2. What was the criterion used to describe the failure of a fibre?
In order to obtain consistent values of the longitudinal modulus under tension and compression, that strong bonding between fibres and matrix was assumed leading to fibre rupture rather than buckling or kinking.
Q3. What is the effect of the bias yarns on the elastic curve?
The bias yarns are reoriented along the loading direction (straightening effect), which may also result in perceived oscillation of the instantaneous stiffness curve [23].
Q4. What was the process of calculating the global stiffness matrix?
if any of the failure indices reach a value of one, elastic constants were reduced in a single step according to the mode of failure, and the global stiffness matrix was assembled from effective stiffness matrices.
Q5. What are the advantages of gradual degradation schemes?
Attractive aspects of these schemes are simplicity in implementation and computational efficiency for large problems, since the damage variable is defined as a constant, whereas in the gradual degradation scheme, the damage variable is a function of evolving solution-dependent variables, thus leading to a large computation time.
Q6. What is the tensile modulus after point A?
After point A, the computed tensile modulus decreases gradually with axial loadings, while the amplitude of experimental instantaneous stiffness varies with a general decreasing trend.
Q7. How many elements were required to achieve an acceptable mesh quality?
Since the pure matrix region between the yarns was very thin (*0.02–0.05 mm), a number of elements required to attain acceptable mesh quality was relatively high compared to that for yarns.
Q8. What is the simulated stress–strain behaviour for braiding angles?
For the braiding angle of 15 , thestress–strain behaviour is almost linear up to failure, while stress–strain behaviours for braiding angle larger than 20 show a more non-linear response, implying progressive damage accumulation reducing the overall stiffness of the component.
Q9. What was the use of the user-definedfield subroutine?
The damage-initiation criteria with the propertydegradation model were implemented into the Abaqus implicit solver with the use of the user-definedfield subroutine (USDFLD).
Q10. What are the main uses of braided composites?
Braided textile-reinforced composites have received considerable attention in the recent years as protection materials for various applications, including sportsproducts (e.g. helmets and shin guards) [1, 2].
Q11. What was the carbon fibre used in this study?
The carbon fibre tested and modelled in this work was a PAN (Polyacrylonitrile)-based AKSAca A-42 carbon fibre with bulk density of 1.78 g/cm3 and yield of 800 g/km, respectively.
Q12. What is the equivalence of strain in continuum damage mechanics?
For each small displacement increment, the elastic stiffness matrix was calculated according to the hypothesis of strain equivalence in continuum damage mechanics.
Q13. What is the description of braided composites?
Such composites combine high structural stability with low cost, excellent damage tolerance and energy absorption thanks to yarn interlacing.
Q14. Why is the tensile strength of epoxy matrix lower than that of the compressive one?
This is due to the influence of hydrostatic pressure (a first invariant of the stress tensor) besides deviatoric stress components on the tensile strength.
Q15. What was the Stassi criterion used to capture damage initiation in pure matrix?
A modified von Mises criterion (the Stassi’s criterion), which accounts for two strength parameters, was employed to capture damage initiation in pure matrix both for micro- and meso-scale models.
Q16. What is the simulated stress–strain curve for braided composites?
A linear character of the macroscopic stress–strain curve indicates that fibres rupture simultaneously with initial fibre failure before the matrix cracking occurs completely in the component.
Q17. How does the matrix damage accumulate in the tension mode?
Matrix damage is observed to accumulate rapidly in the tension mode (Fig. 14), both in tows and the matrix block, at strain levels of 1.08 and 3.60 %.
Q18. What are the failure criteria for fibre and matrix?
The failure criteria are usually established in terms of mathematical expressions using the material strengths, with the consideration of different failure modes of the composite constituents.