scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Ultracapacitors: why, how, and where is the technology

Andrew Burke
- 01 Nov 2000 - 
- Vol. 91, Iss: 1, pp 37-50
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors compared the power density characteristics of ultracapacitors and batteries with respect to the same charge/discharge efficiency and showed that the battery can achieve energy densities of 10 Wh/kg or higher with a power density of 1-2 kW/kg.
About
This article is published in Journal of Power Sources.The article was published on 2000-11-01 and is currently open access. It has received 2603 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Supercapacitor & Power density.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Materials for electrochemical capacitors

TL;DR: This work has shown that combination of pseudo-capacitive nanomaterials, including oxides, nitrides and polymers, with the latest generation of nanostructured lithium electrodes has brought the energy density of electrochemical capacitors closer to that of batteries.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors

TL;DR: Two important future research directions are indicated and summarized, based on results published in the literature: the development of composite and nanostructured ES materials to overcome the major challenge posed by the low energy density.
Journal ArticleDOI

Graphene-Based Ultracapacitors

TL;DR: CMG materials are made from 1-atom thick sheets of carbon, functionalized as needed, and here their performance in an ultracapacitor cell is demonstrated, illustrating the exciting potential for high performance, electrical energy storage devices based on this new class of carbon material.
Journal ArticleDOI

Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes

TL;DR: This tutorial review provides a brief summary of recent research progress on carbon-based electrode materials forsupercapacitors, as well as the importance of electrolytes in the development of supercapacitor technology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Carbon properties and their role in supercapacitors

TL;DR: Supercapacitors are able to store and deliver energy at relatively high rates (beyond those accessible with batteries) because the mechanism of energy storage is simple charge-separation (as in conventional capacitors) as discussed by the authors.
References
More filters
Book

Electrochemical Supercapacitors : Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications

TL;DR: In this paper, the double-layer and surface functionalities at Carbon were investigated and the double layer at Capacitor Electrode Interfaces: its structure and Capacitance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Conducting polymers as active materials in electrochemical capacitors

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used poly-3-(4-fluorophenyl)-thiophene (PEPT) in an electrolyte of 1 M tetramethylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate (TMATFMS) in acetonitrile.
Book

Electrochemistry of Semiconductors and Electronics: Processes and Devices

TL;DR: Electrochemical Deposition of Semiconductors, Chemical Etching, Electrochemical Passivation of (Hg, Cd)Te, Photoelectrochemical Characterization, Electro Chemical Migration, Electro chemical Capacitors

Double layer capacitance of carbon foam electrodes

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated a wide variety of microcellular carbon foams prepared by the controlled pyrolysis and carbonization of several polymers including: polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polymethacryllitrile(PMAN), resorcinol/formaldehyde (RF), divinylbenzene/metha-rylnitrile, phenolics (furfuryl/alcohol), and cellulose polymers such as Rayon, and presented the complex impedance analysis and double layer charging characteristics of electrodes prepared
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (21)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Ultracapacitors: why, how, and where is the technology" ?

A key problem in the fabrication of these advanced devices is the bonding of the thin electrodes to a current collector such the contact resistance is less than 0. 1 V cm. Special attention is given in the paper to comparing the power density characteristics of ultracapacitors and batteries. 

In progressing from small laboratory cells to larger, multi-electrode or multi-cell devices, packaging has been a problem in developing ultracapacitors, because of their inherent low energy density and need for very low resistance to have a clear power density advantage compared with batteries. 

relative to batteries, the advantages of ultracapacitors as pulse power devices are high power density, high efficiency, and long shelf and cycle life. 

Since the energy stored in the unit is proportional to its voltage squared, reducing the maximum voltage of the unit will have a significant effect on its useable energy density. 

The primary uncertainties concerning the hybrid capacitors are their shelf and cycle life due to the use of battery-like positive electrodes. 

Based on the low resistance of the thin electrodes using aqueous electrolytes, it seems likely that the peak power densities of the devices will be at least several kWrkg. 

The electronic resistivity of the electrode in an ultracapacitor must be less than 1 mV-cm if the resistance of the cell is to be low. 

Material purity is particularly important for ultracapacitors because it strongly affects both their leakage current and life characteristics. 

The most critical factor in the cost of the ultracapacitor is the cost of the electrode material, which in many cases is high surface area, speciality carbon particulate or cloth. 

In order to meet these power requirements, the electrode thickness should be less than 150 mm and a large fraction of the micropores should have a ˚diameter of at least 10–20 A. 

Electrical energy storage is required in many applications — telecommunication devices, such as cell phones and pagers, stand-by power systems, and electricrhybrid vehicles. 

The primary reason for the higher power and relatively low energy density of the devices with the low RC time constant is that they utilize much thinner elecŽtrodes with the result that the inactive components current .collector, separator and packaging are a much greater fraction of the device weight. 

For small devices, the weight of ruthenium oxide needed is only a fraction of a gram so that the cost of the materials would be quite low. 

Most ultracapacitor devices have been built using the monoblock approach, because the quality control required is less demanding and the packaging and assembly are simpler. 

The high specific capacitance is thought to be due to the intercalation of the Hq ions into the bulk of the hydrous oxide making the specific capacitance much less sensitive to surface area than was the case w xwith the anhydrous oxide. 

The energy density claimed for the devices using lead oxide for the positive electrode are 10–20 W hrkg for a voltage range of 0.7–1.8 V. 

This requires a very high conductivity adhesive or a bonding process that chemicallyjoins the electrode material to the current collector material, which is usually a metal foil, either nickel or aluminum. 

As power requirements for many applications become more demanding, it is often reasonable to consider separating the energy and power requirements by providing for the peak power Ž .by using a pulse power device capacitor that is charged Ž .periodically from a primary energy storage unit battery . 

The calculated results indicate that there is considerable potential for increasing the energy density and maximum power of ultracapacitors using carbon andorganic electrolytes from that of the best of the present devices. 

The result of these differences in electrolyte properties is that ultracapacitors using organic electrolytes must much thinner electrodes than those using aqueous electrolytes and thus lower capacitance per electrode area. 

The power densities are more difficult to estimate with reasonable confidence because of the uncertain contributions of the pore resistance of the carbon andthe contact resistances at the electrodercurrent collector interfaces to the total resistance of the device.