scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Using the IPQ and PMDI to predict regular diabetes care-seeking among patients with Type 1 diabetes

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Comparing the performance of the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) and a modified version of the Personal Models of Diabetes Interview (PMDI) in predicting care-seeking showed that the most important construct was treatment effectiveness.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were, first, to identify factors associated with regular diabetes care-seeking and, second, to compare the performance of the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) and a modified version of the Personal Models of Diabetes Interview (PMDI) in predicting care-seeking. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional study involving 42 patients who had not attended hospital diabetes clinic for a period of 18 months or more and 42 matched controls receiving specialist care. Differences in illness representations between clinic attenders and non-attenders were examined. Due to the variability in care-seeking between non-attenders (ranging from no contact with health professionals to regular general practitioners care), participants were then reclassified for further analyses into those receiving regular care from either hospital diabetes clinic or general practice (n = 52) and those receiving no regular care (n = 32). RESULTS: Patients not seeking regular care held more negative views of the control, course and consequences of diabetes than those who received regular care. Regression analyses showed that the most important construct was treatment effectiveness. Treatment effectiveness (PMDI) and control (IPQ) dimensions were associated with clinic attendance. PMDI constructs of treatment effectiveness, threat and worries were associated with regular care-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: IPQ and PMDI results were generally consistent. In order to understand diabetes care-seeking behaviour it is important to measure beliefs about the benefits of treatment recommendations in addition to those of the disease itself. Emotional and cognitive responses to diabetes should be assessed.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation: Meta-Analysis and Test of a Process Model

TL;DR: Meta-analytic path analyses supported a process model that included direct effects of illness representations on outcomes and indirect effects mediated by coping, which includes effects of moderators, individual differences, and beliefs about coping and treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

The importance of health belief models in determining self-care behaviour in diabetes.

TL;DR: A review of interventions indicates those based on psychological theory offer professionals the best chance of maximizing patients’ contribution to diabetes self‐management and achieving improved outcomes, both glycaemic and psychosocial.
Journal ArticleDOI

Participation and drop-out in pulmonary rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis of the patient's perspective

TL;DR: Uptake and drop-out may be related to patients' perceived disabilities, expected benefits and concerns with regard to rehabilitation, practical barriers and confidence in their own capabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

General practitioners trained in motivational interviewing can positively affect the attitude to behaviour change in people with type 2 diabetes. One year follow-up of an RCT, ADDITION Denmark.

TL;DR: MI improved type 2 patients’ understanding of diabetes, their beliefs regarding treatment aspects, their contemplation on and motivation for behaviour change, and whether the results can be sustained long term and are clinically relevant in terms of changes in risk profile advocates further research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding why people with type 1 diabetes do not attend for specialist advice: a qualitative analysis of the views of people with insulin-dependent diabetes who do not attend diabetes clinic.

TL;DR: Qualitative interviews were carried out with 12 long-term non-attenders and three distinct groups emerged differing in terms of their cognitive and emotional responses to diabetes and their coping strategies: the ‘High fear’ group; the “Patient as expert” group; and the � ‘Low motivation“.
Related Papers (5)