scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Variation in the recall of socially rewarding information and depressive symptom severity: a prospective cohort study.

TLDR
To test the association between recall for socially rewarding (positive) and/or socially critical (negative) information and depressive symptoms, a large number of patients with confirmed or suspected depressive symptoms are surveyed.
Abstract
Objective To test the association between recall for socially rewarding (positive) and/or socially critical (negative) information and depressive symptoms. Method Cohort study of people who had visited UK primary care in the past year reporting depressive symptoms (N = 558, 69% female). Positive and negative recall was assessed at three time-points, 2 weeks apart, using a computerised task. Depressive symptoms were assessed at four time-points using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Analyses were conducted using multilevel models. Results Concurrently we found evidence that, for every increase in two positive words recalled, depressive symptoms reduced by 0.6 (95% CI −1.0 to −0.2) BDI points. This association was not affected by adjustment for confounders. There was no evidence of an association between negative recall and depressive symptoms (−0.1, 95% CI −0.5 to 0.3). Longitudinally, we found more evidence that positive recall was associated with reduced depressive symptoms than vice versa. Conclusion People with more severe depressive symptoms recall less positive information, even if their recall of negative information is unaltered. Clinicians could put more emphasis on encouraging patients to recall positive, socially rewarding information, rather than trying to change negative interpretations of events that have already occurred.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Thinking fast and slow.

TL;DR: Prospect Theory led cognitive psychology in a new direction that began to uncover other human biases in thinking that are probably not learned but are part of the authors' brain’s wiring.
Journal ArticleDOI

How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches

TL;DR: The ways in which monoamine neurotransmitter-based and neural plasticity theories reflect different or complementary approaches to antidepressant drug action are discussed, and how they might be integrated to offer novel solutions for people with depression are discussed.
BookDOI

Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System

TL;DR: This report makes recommendations specifically for clinical settings of health care to identify those who suffer the resultant negative health impacts of social isolation and loneliness and target interventions to improve their social conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

The association between loneliness and depressive symptoms among adults aged 50 years and older: a 12-year population-based cohort study.

TL;DR: Irrespective of other social experiences, higher loneliness scores at baseline were associated with higher depression symptom severity scores during 12 years of follow-up among adults aged 50 years and older, suggesting that 11-18% of cases of depression could potentially be prevented if loneliness were eliminated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 Social Study.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored whether UK residents with more frequent or supportive social contact had fewer depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and potential factors moderating the relationship.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An inventory for measuring depression

TL;DR: The difficulties inherent in obtaining consistent and adequate diagnoses for the purposes of research and therapy have been pointed out and a wide variety of psychiatric rating scales have been developed.
Book

Thinking, Fast and Slow

TL;DR: Buku terlaris New York Times and The Economist tahun 2012 as mentioned in this paper, and dipilih oleh The NewYork Times Book Review sebagai salah satu dari sepuluh buku terbaik tahune 2011, Berpikir, Cepat and Lambat ditakdirkan menjadi klasik.
Journal ArticleDOI

General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations

TL;DR: This work generalizes the method proposed by Gelman and Rubin (1992a) for monitoring the convergence of iterative simulations by comparing between and within variances of multiple chains, in order to obtain a family of tests for convergence.
Journal Article

Thinking fast and slow.

TL;DR: Prospect Theory led cognitive psychology in a new direction that began to uncover other human biases in thinking that are probably not learned but are part of the authors' brain’s wiring.
Related Papers (5)