scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence? Configurations, contexts and mechanisms

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The authors argue that policy-relevant facts are the result of an intensive and complex struggle for political and epistemic authority, and they propose to understand expertise and evidence as "socially embedded" in authority relations and cultural contexts.
Abstract
Many studies on evidence-based policy are still clinging to a linear model. Instead, we propose to understand expertise and evidence as 'socially embedded' in authority relations and cultural contexts. Policy-relevant facts are the result of an intensive and complex struggle for political and epistemic authority. This is especially true where science and policy are difficult to distinguish and the guidelines for validating knowledge are highly contested. To understand the mechanisms leading to policy-based evidence and the long-term consequences of these transformations more comparative research on the cultural and institutional 'embeddedness' of epistemic and political authority is needed. Language: en

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed

TL;DR: Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
Journal ArticleDOI

What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors suggest an alternative approach called quantitative story-telling, which encourages a major effort in the pre-analytic, prequantitative phase of the analysis as to map a socially robust universe of possible frames, which represent different lenses through which to perceive what the problem is.

The fifth branch. Science advisers as policymakers

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define good science as "the political function of good science from advice to policy Acceptable risk Scientific advice as Legitimation: Negotiation and Boundary Work Defining "Good Science" Normative Implications.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

TL;DR: The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems as discussed by the authors, whereas science has developed to deal with tame problems.

and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39

TL;DR: A model of how one group of actors managed this tension between divergent viewpoints was presented, drawing on the work of amateurs, professionals, administrators and others connected to the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley, during its early years.
Journal ArticleDOI

Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39:

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a model of how one group of actors managed the tension between divergent viewpoints and the need for generalizable findings in scientific work, and distinguish four types of boundary objects: repositories, ideal types, coincident boundaries and standardized forms.