Q2. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Wind tunnel analysis of flow and dispersion in cross-ventilated isolated buildings_ impact of opening positions" ?
Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that this study has the following limitations, which provide directions for future research:
Q3. What was the laser beam used as a light source?
A laser beam (λ¼532 nm, 200 mW, Kato Koken Co.) was used as a light source and converted into a laser sheet parallel to the flow direction by using a cylindrical lens.
Q4. How many m/s is the wind speed at the boundary layer?
The wind speed at building height H (i.e., UH) is 4.3 m/s, yielding a building Reynolds number of about 45,000, under the condition that the reference velocity at the boundary layer height (1.0 m) is 7.1 m/s.
Q5. What is the main reason why the concentration decays in the entire indoor volume?
The combination of flapping jet behavior and Kelvin–Helmholz instability is a main reason why the concentration decays in the entire indoor volume, and not only at the top part of the volume.
Q6. How many images of the flow visualizations were taken in each of the configurations?
6–10 each provide 16 images of flow visualizations in the vertical centerplane of each of the five configurations, with a time interval of 1 s between consecutive images.
Q7. Why is the kinetic energy k attributed to the top position of the outlet opening?
This is attributed due to the top position of the outlet opening, which increases the overall resistance of the indoor jet flow compared to configuration C.
Q8. What is the percentage of concentration decay for the last figure relative to the first figure?
Assuming that the color intensity in the vertical center section is linearly proportional to the indoor tracer gas concentration, the percentage of concentration decay for the last figure (p) relative to the first figure leads to the ranking (from best to worst ventilated): E (78%), B (64%), A (62%), C (58%) and D (57%).
Q9. How many mm diameters are used for the SFP?
The diameters of the support for the SFP and the sampling tube of the total hydrocarbon analyzer are 6 mm and 1 mm, respectively.