scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "International relations published in 2000"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors argue that actors have a third mode of social action at their disposal: arguing and deliberating about the validity claims inherent in any communicative statement about identities, interests, and the state of the world.
Abstract: This article introduces a mode of social action and interaction that has so far been largely overlooked in the U.S.-dominated international relations debate between rational choice and social constructivism that focuses mainly on the differences between instrumental rationality and norm-guided behavior. Drawing on insights from a theoretical debate within the Germanspeaking international relations community, I suggest that actors have a third mode of social action at their disposal: arguing and deliberating about the validity claims inherent in any communicative statement about identities, interests, and the state of the world. Arguing and truth-seeking behavior presuppose that actors no longer hold fixed interests during their communicative interaction but are open to persuasion, challenges, and counterchallenges geared toward reaching a reasoned consensus. The preconditions for argumentative rationality, particularly a “common lifeworld” and the mutual recognition of speakers as equals in a nonhierarchical relationship, are more common in international relations than is usually assumed. Arguing processes are more likely to occur the more actors are uncertain about their interests and even identities, the less they know about the situation in which they find themselves and the underlying “rules of the game,” and the more apparently irreconcilable differences prevent them from reaching an optimal rather than a merely satisfactory solution for a widely perceived problem (“problem solving”). Moreover, arguing is likely to increase the influence of the materially less powerful, be it small states or nonstate actors such as INGOs. I illustrate these claims empirically with two plausibility probes. The first concerns the East–West talks leading to a negotiated settlement of the Cold War in Europe and German unification within NATO. The second case focuses on the implementation of international human rights norms into domestic practices of Third World states.

2,008 citations


Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine why international actors, including states, firms, and activists, create different types of legalized arrangements to solve political and substantive problems and show how particular forms of legalization provide superior institutional solutions in different circumstances.
Abstract: We examine why international actors -- including states, firms, and activists -- create different types of legalized arrangements to solve political and substantive problems. We show how particular forms of legalization provide superior institutional solutions in different circumstances. We begin by examining the baseline advantages of "hard" legalization (that is, precise, legally binding obligations with appropriate third-party delegation). We emphasize, however, that actors often prefer softer forms of legalization (that is, various combinations of reduced precision, less stringent obligation, and weaker delegation). Soft legalization has a number of significant advantages: it is easier to achieve, provides strategies for dealing with uncertainty, infringes less on sovereignty, and facilitates compromise among differentiated actors. Although our approach is largely interest-based, we explicitly incorporate the normative elements that are central in law and in recent international relations theorizing. We also consider the important role of nonstate actors who, along with states, are central participants in contemporary international legalization. We illustrate the advantages of various forms of international legal arrangements with examples drawn from articles in this special issue and elsewhere.

1,623 citations


Book
18 Dec 2000
TL;DR: Triangulating Peace as mentioned in this paper argues that democracy, economic interdependence, and international mediation can successfully cooperate to significantly reduce the chances of war in the field of international relations, and it is based on ideas originally put forth by Immanuel Kant.
Abstract: Triangulating Peace tackles today's most provocative hypothesis in the field of international relations: the democratic peace proposition. Drawing on ideas originally put forth by Immanuel Kant, the authors argue that democracy, economic interdependence, and international mediation can successfully cooperate to significantly reduce the chances of war.

1,477 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine why international actors seek different types of legalized arrangements to solve political and substantive problems and show how particular forms of legalization provide superior institutional solutions in different circumstances.
Abstract: We examine why international actors—including states, firms, and activists—seek different types of legalized arrangements to solve political and substantive problems. We show how particular forms of legalization provide superior institutional solutions in different circumstances. We begin by examining the baseline advantages of “hard” legalization (that is, precise, legally binding obligations with appropriate third-party delegation). We emphasize, however, that actors often prefer softer forms of legalization (that is, various combinations of reduced precision, less stringent obligation, and weaker delegation). Soft legalization has a number of significant advantages, including that it is easier to achieve, provides strategies for dealing with uncertainty, infringes less on sovereignty, and facilitates compromise among differentiated actors.Although our approach is largely interest-based, we explicitly incorporate the normative elements that are central in law and in recent international relations theorizing. We also consider the important role of nonstate actors who, along with states, are central participants in contemporary international legalization. We illustrate the advantages of various forms of international legal arrangements with examples drawn from articles in this special issue and elsewhere.

1,415 citations


Book
15 Dec 2000
TL;DR: Ikenberry as mentioned in this paper argues that the United States' ability to make commitments and restrain power is crucial for building stable and cooperative relations among industrial democracies. And he argues that only with the spread of democracy in the twentieth century and the innovative use of international institutions has order been created that goes beyond balance of power politics to exhibit constitutional characteristics.
Abstract: The end of the Cold War was a "big bang" reminiscent of earlier moments after major wars, such as the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 and the end of the World Wars in 1919 and 1945. Here John Ikenberry asks the question, what do states that win wars do with their newfound power and how do they use it to build order? In examining the postwar settlements in modern history, he argues that powerful countries do seek to build stable and cooperative relations, but the type of order that emerges hinges on their ability to make commitments and restrain power. The author explains that only with the spread of democracy in the twentieth century and the innovative use of international institutions--both linked to the emergence of the United States as a world power--has order been created that goes beyond balance of power politics to exhibit "constitutional" characteristics. The open character of the American polity and a web of multilateral institutions allow the United States to exercise strategic restraint and establish stable relations among the industrial democracies despite rapid shifts and extreme disparities in power. This volume includes a new preface reflecting on the reverberating impact of past postwar settlements and the lessons that hold contemporary relevance. Blending comparative politics with international relations, and history with theory, After Victory will be of interest to anyone concerned with the organization of world order, the role of institutions in world politics, and the lessons of past postwar settlements for today. It also speaks to today's debate over the ability of the United States to lead in an era of unipolar power.

1,382 citations


Posted Content
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that effective and decent global regulation depends on the determination of individuals to engage with powerful agendas and decision-making bodies that would otherwise be dominated by concentrated economic interests.
Abstract: Across an amazing sweep of the critical areas of business regulation - from contract, intellectual property and corporations law, to trade, telecommunications, labour standards, drugs, food, transport and environment - this book confronts the question of how the regulation of business has shifted from national to global institutions. Based on interviews with 500 international leaders in business and government, this book examines the role played by global institutions such as the WTO, the OECD, IMF, Moody's and the World Bank, as well as various NGOs and significant individuals. The authors argue that effective and decent global regulation depends on the determination of individuals to engage with powerful agendas and decision-making bodies that would otherwise be dominated by concentrated economic interests. This book will become a standard reference for readers in business, law, politics and international relations.

1,142 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that although realism's concepts of anarchy, self-help, and power balancing may have been appropriate to a bygone era, they have been displaced by changed conditions and eclipsed by better ideas.
Abstract: Some students of international politics believe that realism is obsolete.1 They argue that, although realism’s concepts of anarchy, self-help, and power balancing may have been appropriate to a bygone era, they have been displaced by changed conditions and eclipsed by better ideas. New times call for new thinking. Changing conditions require revised theories or entirely different ones. True, if the conditions that a theory contemplated have changed, the theory no longer applies. But what sorts of changes would alter the international political system so profoundly that old ways of thinking would no longer be relevant? Changes of the system would do it; changes in the system would not. Within-system changes take place all the time, some important, some not. Big changes in the means of transportation, communication, and war Žghting, for example, strongly affect how states and other agents interact. Such changes occur at the unit level. In modern history, or perhaps in all of history, the introduction of nuclear weaponry was the greatest of such changes. Yet in the nuclear era, international politics remains a self-help arena. Nuclear weapons decisively change how some states provide for their own and possibly for others’ security; but nuclear weapons have not altered the anarchic structure of the international political system. Changes in the structure of the system are distinct from changes at the unit level. Thus, changes in polarity also affect how states provide for their security. SigniŽcant changes take place when the number of great powers reduces to two or one. With more than two, states rely for their security both on their

1,116 citations


Book
01 Feb 2000
TL;DR: Enloe's "Maneuvers" as mentioned in this paper explores the complicated militarized experiences of women as prostitutes, as rape victims, as mothers, as wives, as nurses, and as feminist activists, and explores the'maneuvers' that military officials and their civilian supporters have made in order to ensure that each group of women feel special and separate.
Abstract: "Maneuvers" takes readers on a global tour of the sprawling process called 'militarization'. With her incisive verve and moxie, eminent feminist Cynthia Enloe shows that the people who become militarized are not just the obvious ones - executives and factory floor workers who make fighter planes, land mines, and intercontinental missiles. They are also the employees of food companies, toy companies, clothing companies, film studios, stock brokerages, and advertising agencies. Militarization is never gender-neutral, Enloe claims: It is a personal and political transformation that relies on ideas about femininity and masculinity. Films that equate action with war, condoms that are designed with a camouflage pattern, fashions that celebrate brass buttons and epaulettes, tomato soup that contains pasta shaped like "Star Wars"' weapons - all of these contribute to militaristic values that mold our culture in both war and peace. Presenting new and groundbreaking material that builds on Enloe's acclaimed work in "Does Khaki Become You?" and "Bananas, Beaches, and Bases", "Maneuvers" takes an international look at the politics of masculinity, nationalism, and globalization. Enloe ranges widely from Japan to Korea, Serbia, Kosovo, Rwanda, Britain, Israel, the United States, and many points in between. She covers a broad variety of subjects: gays in the military, the history of 'camp followers', the politics of women who have sexually serviced male soldiers, married life in the military, military nurses, and the recruitment of women into the military. One chapter titled "When Soldiers Rape" explores the many facets of the issue in countries such as Chile, the Philippines, Okinawa, Rwanda, and the United States. Enloe outlines the dilemmas feminists around the globe face in trying to craft theories and strategies that support militarized women, locally and internationally, without unwittingly being militarized themselves. She explores the complicated militarized experiences of women as prostitutes, as rape victims, as mothers, as wives, as nurses, and as feminist activists, and she uncovers the 'maneuvers' that military officials and their civilian supporters have made in order to ensure that each of these groups of women feel special and separate.

999 citations


Book
10 May 2000
TL;DR: The Globalization Reader as mentioned in this paper provides a comprehensive introduction to the debates about globalization through a selection of key readings on the subject and is essential reading for anyone interested in the impact of globalization on politics, sociology, geography, international relations, economics, and culture.
Abstract: The Globalization Reader provides a comprehensive introduction to the debates about globalization through a selection of key readings on the subject. It is essential reading for anyone interested in the impact of globalization on politics, sociology, geography, international relations, economics, and culture.

814 citations


Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: The Handbook of Conflict Resolution as discussed by the authors is a classic handbook for conflict resolution that is both comprehensive and deeply informed on topics vital to the field like power, gender, cooperation, emotion, and trust.
Abstract: Praise for The Handbook of Conflict Resolution "This handbook is a classic. It helps connect the research of academia to the practical realities of peacemaking and peacebuilding like no other. It is both comprehensive and deeply informed on topics vital to the field like power, gender, cooperation, emotion, and trust. It now sits prominently on my bookshelf." —Leymah Gbowee, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate "The Handbook of Conflict Resolution offers an astonishing array of insightful articles on theory and practice by leading scholars and practitioners. Students, professors, and professionals alike can learn a great deal from studying this Handbook." —William Ury, Director, Global Negotiation Project, Harvard University; coauthor, Getting to Yes and author, The Third Side "Morton Deutsch, Peter Coleman, and Eric Marcus put together a handbook that will be helpful to many. I hope the book will reach well beyond North America to contribute to the growing worldwide interest in the constructive resolution of conflict. This book offers instructive ways to make this commitment a reality." —George J. Mitchell, Former majority leader of the United States Senate; former chairman of the Peace Negotiations in Northern Ireland and the International Fact-Finding Committee on Violence in the Middle East; chairman of the board, Walt Disney Company; senior fellow at the School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University "Let's be honest. This book is just too big to carry around in your hand. But that's because it is loaded with the most critical essays linking the theory and practice of conflict resolution. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution is heavy on content and should be a well-referenced resource on the desk of every mediator—as it is on mine." —Johnston Barkat, Assistant Secretary-General, Ombudsman and Mediation Services, United Nations

783 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article argued that Africa is neither more nor less than a part of the planet, and it is pointless to pretend that, to quote one French former colonial governor, it leads a "traditional existence shielded from the outside world, as though it were another planet" which passively absorbs the shock of having been made dependent on other parts of the world.
Abstract: A    S is often said to be the limbo of the international system, existing only at the outer limits of the planet which we inhabit. But, again according to a widespread opinion, it is unlikely that Africa is a limbo in the sense of Roman Catholic theology—that is to say, a place where souls are prepared for redemption. ‘Africa has remained cut off from all contacts with the rest of the world; it is the land of gold, for ever pressing in upon itself, and the land of childhood, removed from the light of self-conscious history and wrapped in the dark mantle of night’, wrote Hegel.1 The vast literature produced by journalists and academics which refers ad nauseam to the marginalization of the sub-continent, or to its ‘disconnection’, even if it is only ‘by default’,2 does no more than reproduce Hegel’s idea that this part of the globe is an ‘enclave’, existing in ‘isolation’ on account of its deserts, its forests and its alleged primitiveness. For those who subscribe to this school of thought, the spread of war as a mode of political regulation over the last decade or so is a sign that the day of salvation is yet far off. Evidence is offered by those terrible messengers, the handless amputees produced by war in Sierra Leone, the Danteesque inferno of the genocide of Rwandan Tutsis in 1994, or the spread of the AIDS pandemic, a sinister companion of conflict, which decimates those populations which war has spared. Nevertheless, if we are to stay with the metaphor of limbo, it is above all in a limbo of the intellect that such a simplistic view of the relation of Africa with the rest of the world is conceived. For the sub-continent is neither more nor less than a part of the planet, and it is pointless to pretend that, to quote one French former colonial governor,3 it leads a ‘traditional existence shielded from the outside world, as though it were another planet’, which passively absorbs the shock of having been made dependent on other parts of the world.

Book
13 Nov 2000
TL;DR: The authors argues that the Cold War helped facilitate key social reforms, including desegregation, and argues that civil rights activists gained tremendous advantage as the government sought to polish its international image, but improving the nation's reputation did not always require real change.
Abstract: In 1958, an African handyman named Jimmy Wilson was sentenced to die in Alabama for stealing two dollars. Shocking as this sentence was, it was overturned only after intense international attention and the interference of an embarrassed John Foster Dulles. Soon after the United States' segregated military defeated a racist regime in World War II, American racism was a major concern of US allies, a chief Soviet propaganda theme, and an obstacle to American Cold War goals throughout Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Each lynching harmed foreign relations, and "the Negro problem" became a central issue in every administration from Truman to Johnson. In what may be the best analysis of how international relations affected any domestic issue, the author interprets post-war civil rights as a Cold War feature. She argues that the Cold War helped facilitate key social reforms, including desegregation. Civil rights activists gained tremendous advantage as the government sought to polish its international image. But improving the nation's reputation did not always require real change. This focus on image rather than substance - combined with constraints on McCarthy-era political activism and the triumph of law-and-order rhetoric - limited the nature and extent of progress. Archival information, much of it newly available, supports the author's argument that civil rights was Cold War policy. But the story is also one of people: an African-American veteran of World War II lynched in Georgia; an attorney general flooded by civil rights petitions from abroad; the teenagers who desegregated Little Rock's Central High; African diplomats denied restaurant service; black artists living in Europe and supporting the civil rights movement from overseas; conservative politicians viewing desegregation as a communist plot; and civil rights leaders who saw their struggle eclipsed by Vietnam. Never before has any scholar so directly connected civil rights and the Cold War. Contributing mightily to our understanding of both, the author advances a new wave of scholarship that corrects isolationist tendencies in American history by applying an international perspective to domestic affairs.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined how the risks of accelerated internationalization of businesses can be mitigated and how the internationalization will accelerate in the 21st century, using the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Abstract: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development predicts that the internationalization of businesses will accelerate in the 21st century. Our study examined how the risks of accelerated ...

Book
28 Feb 2000
TL;DR: Mittelman as mentioned in this paper argues that a more complete understanding of globalization requires an appreciation of its cultural dimensions, and considers the voices of those affected by this trend, including those who resist it and particularly those who are hurt by it.
Abstract: Here James Mittelman explains the systemic dynamics and myriad consequences of globalization, focusing on the interplay between globalizing market forces, in some instances guided by the state, and the needs of society. Mittelman finds that globalization is hardly a unified phenomenon but rather a syndrome of processes and activities: a set of ideas and a policy framework. More specifically, globalization is propelled by a changing division of labor and power, manifested in a new regionalism, and challenged by fledgling resistance movements. The author argues that a more complete understanding of globalization requires an appreciation of its cultural dimensions. From this perspective, he considers the voices of those affected by this trend, including those who resist it and particularly those who are hurt by it."The Globalization Syndrome" is among the first books to present a holistic and multilevel analysis of globalization, connecting the economic to the political and cultural, joining agents and multiple structures, and interrelating different local, regional, and global arenas. Mittelman's findings are drawn mainly from the non-Western worlds. He provides a cross-regional analysis of Eastern Asia, an epicenter of globalization, and Southern Africa, a key node in the most marginalized continent. The evidence shows that while offering many benefits to some, globalization has become an uneasy correlation of deep tensions, giving rise to a range of alternative scenarios.

Book ChapterDOI
31 Dec 2000
TL;DR: Pharr and Putnam as mentioned in this paper found that at the national level, social trust and confidence in government and its institutions are strongly associated with each other and that social trust can help build effective social and political institutions, which can help governments perform effectively and encourage confidence in civic institutions.
Abstract: Is there a widespread loss of faith in the core institutions of representative democracy? Based on a comparison of 17 trilateral democracies this study examines institutional confidence from the early 1980s to the early 1990s then considers explanations based on the social psychology of trusting personalities, cultural accounts based on life experiences, and theories of institutional performance. The study concludes that at national level, social trust and confidence in government and its institutions are strongly associated with each other. Social trust can help build effective social and political institutions, which can help governments perform effectively, and this in turn encourages confidence in civic institutions. Paper for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, 1-5th September 1999. Panel 14-2T WHAT'S TROUBLING THE TRILATERAL DEMOCRACIES? (Co-sponsored by 11-6) Friday 3rd September 1.30-3.15. This study is forthcoming as Chapter 8 in Susan Pharr and Robert Putnam (eds). DISAFFECTED DEMOCRACIES: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: DieDiehl and Goertz as mentioned in this paper provide a detailed analysis of international rivalries, the long-standing and often violent confrontations between the same pairs of states, and explore the origins, dynamics, and termination of the most dangerous form of rivalry since 1816.
Abstract: This book provides the first detailed analysis of international rivalries, the long-standing and often violent confrontations between the same pairs of states. The book addresses conceptual components of rivalries and explores the origins, dynamics, and termination of the most dangerous form of rivalry--enduring rivalry--since 1816.Paul Diehl and Gary Goertz identify 1166 rivalries since 1816. They label sixty-three of those as enduring rivalries. These include the competitions between the United States and Soviet Union, India and Pakistan, and Israel and her Arab neighbors. The authors explain how rivalries form, evolve, and end.The first part of the book deals with how to conceptualize and measure rivalries and presents empirical patterns among rivalries in the period 1816-1992. The concepts derived from the study of rivalries are then used to reexamine two central pieces of international relations research, namely deterrence and "democratic peace" studies. The second half of the book builds an explanation of enduring rivalries based on a theory adapted from evolutionary biology, "punctuated equilibrium."The study of international rivalries has become one of the centerpieces of behavioral research on international conflict. This book, by two of the scholars who pioneered such studies, is the first comprehensive treatment of the subject. It will become the standard reference for all future studies of rivalries.Paul F. Diehl is Professor of Political Science and University Distinguished Teacher/Scholar, University of Illinois. He is the coeditor of "Reconstructing Realpolitik" and coauthor of "Measuring the Correlates of War." Gary Goertz is Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Arizona, and is the coauthor with Paul Diehl "of Territorial Change and International Conflict."

Book
19 Oct 2000
TL;DR: In this paper, the Normative Dialogue of International Society (NDDS) is used to discuss the value and future of international societies. But the focus is on the past and not the present.
Abstract: Preface 1. The Normative Dialogue of International Society PART I. THEORY AND HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY 2. International Human Relations 3. Recovering the Classical Approach 4. The Classical Approach as a Craft Discipline 5. The Political Theory of International Societas 6. The Situational Ethics of Independent Statecraft 7. The Pluralist Architecture of World Politics PART II. PASSAGES OF CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY 8. Security in a Pluralist World 9. Justifying Conventional War 10. Armed Intervention for Humanity 11. Failed States and International Trusteeship 12. International Boundaries as a Planetary Institution 13. Democracy and International Community PART III. VALUE AND FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY 14. Alternatives to International Societas? 15. Justifying the Global Covenant

Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the power, borders, and meaning of global civil society, and the impact of the movement on the world, and conclude that it takes a village References Index.
Abstract: Preface Acronyms and organizations Introduction: when worlds collide 1. Theory: on power, borders, and meaning 2. Voice in teh village: building a social movement 3. State security: power versus principal 4. 'Indian market': profit versus purpose 5. Identities across borders: the politics of global civil society 6. New times: the impact of the movement Conclusion: it takes a village References Index.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a study of international relations and gender history reveals how gendered ideas about citizenship and political leadership influenced jingoist political leaders' desire to wage conflicts, and traces how they manipulated ideas about gender to embroil the nation in war.
Abstract: This study of international relations and gender history reveals how gendered ideas about citizenship and political leadership influenced jingoist political leaders' desire to wage conflicts, and traces how they manipulated ideas about gender to embroil the nation in war.

Book
12 Jun 2000
TL;DR: The Modern Treaty Law and Practice (MTLP) as mentioned in this paper provides a comprehensive account of the law of treaties from the viewpoint of an experienced practitioner, using clear, accessible language, drawing examples from both treaties and MOUs.
Abstract: This new edition of a textbook first published in 2000 provides a comprehensive account of the law of treaties from the viewpoint of an experienced practitioner. As such, it is the first, and only, book of its kind. Aust provides a wealth of examples of the problems experienced with treaties on a daily basis, not just when they are the subject of a court case. He explores numerous precedents from treaties and other related documents, such as memorandums of understanding (MOUs), in detail. Using clear, accessible language, the author covers the full extent of treaty law, drawing examples from both treaties and MOUs. Modern Treaty Law and Practice is essential reading for teachers and students of law, political science, international relations and diplomacy, who have an interest in treaties.

Book
17 Apr 2000
TL;DR: Theoretical framework: Legislatures, Executives, and Commitment 21 CHAPTER 3 Institutions and influence: Executive Agreements and Treaties 53 CHAPTER 4 Economic Sanctions: Domestic Conflict of Interest and International Cooperation 81 CHAPTER 5 U.S. Food-Aid Policy: The Politics of Delegation and Linkage 112 CHAPTER 6 National Parliaments and European Integration: Institutional Choice in EU Member States 147 CHAPTER 7 Implementing the EU's Internal Market: The Influence of NationalParliaments 164 CHAPTER 8 Conclusion 190 References 203 Index 221
Abstract: Preface vii CHAPTER 1 Introduction 3 CHAPTER 2 Theoretical Framework: Legislatures, Executives, and Commitment 21 CHAPTER 3 Institutions and Influence: Executive Agreements and Treaties 53 CHAPTER 4 Economic Sanctions: Domestic Conflict of Interest and International Cooperation 81 CHAPTER 5 U.S. Food-Aid Policy: The Politics of Delegation and Linkage 112 CHAPTER 6 National Parliaments and European Integration: Institutional Choice in EU Member States 147 CHAPTER 7 Implementing the EU's Internal Market: The Influence of National Parliaments 164 CHAPTER 8 Conclusion 190 References 203 Index 221

MonographDOI
04 Sep 2000
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a challenging explanation of the forces that have shaped the international global warming debate, focusing on the ways non-state actors such as scientific, environmental and industry groups, as opposed to governmental organizations, affect political outcomes in global fora on climate change.
Abstract: This volume provides a challenging explanation of the forces that have shaped the international global warming debate. It takes a novel approach to the subject by concentrating on the ways non-state actors--such as scientific, environmental and industry groups, as opposed to governmental organizations--affect political outcomes in global fora on climate change. It also provides insights into the role of the media in influencing the agenda. The book draws on a range of analytical approaches to assess and explain the influence of these nongovernmental organizations on the course of global climate politics. The book will be of interest to all researchers and policy makers associated with climate change, and will be used in university courses in international relations, politics, and environmental studies.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The international relations of the new Europe are shaped by a process of international socialization in which the Western community transmits its constitutive liberal norms to Central and Eastern Europe as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The international relations of the `new Europe' are shaped by a process of international socialization in which the Western community transmits its constitutive liberal norms to Central and Eastern Europe. This process neither fits rationalist assumptions about international politics in a technical environment nor sociological theories of action. Rather, international socialization in the new Europe is best explained as a process of rational action in a normatively institutionalized international environment. Under these conditions, rational state behaviour is constrained by value-based norms of legitimate statehood and proper conduct. Selfish political actors conform to these norms in order to reap the benefits of international legitimacy, but as instrumental actors they also calculate whether these benefits are worth the costs of conformity and how they can be reaped efficiently. An empirical analysis of the behaviour of the Western socialization agencies and the CEE countries supports this perspective ...

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the influence of trade flows on military disputes of preferential trading arrangements (PTAs), a broad class of commercial institutions that includes free trade areas, common markets, and customs unions, is examined.
Abstract: The relationship between foreign trade and political conflict has been a persistent source of controversy among scholars of international relations. Existing empirical studies of this topic have focused on the effects of trade flows on conflict, but they have largely ignored the institutional context in which trade is conducted. In this article we present some initial quantitative results pertaining to the influence on military disputes of preferential trading arrangements (PTAs), a broad class of commercial institutions that includes free trade areas, common markets, and customs unions. We argue that parties to the same PTA are less prone to disputes than other states and that hostilities between PTA members are less likely to occur as trade flows rise between them. Moreover, we maintain that heightened commerce is more likely to inhibit conflict between states that belong to the same preferential grouping than between states that do not. Our results accord with this argument. Based on an analysis of the period since World War II, we find that trade flows have relatively little effect on the likelihood of disputes between states that do not participate in the same PTA. Within PTAs, however, there is a strong, inverse relationship between commerce and conflict. Parties to such an arrangement are less likely to engage in hostilities than other states, and the likelihood of a military dispute dips markedly as trade increases between them.

Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: Realism and International Relations as mentioned in this paper provides students with a critical yet sympathetic survey of political realism in international theory and argues that realism is best seen as a philosophical orientation or research program that emphasizes the constraints imposed by individual and national egoism and international anarchy.
Abstract: Realism and International Relations provides students with a critical yet sympathetic survey of political realism in international theory. Using six paradigmatic theories - Hans Morgenthau, Kenneth Waltz, the Prisoners' Dilemma, Thucydides, Machiavelli, and Hobbes - the book examines realist accounts of human nature and state motivation, international anarchy, system structure and the balance of power, international institutions, and morality in foreign policy. Donnelly argues that common realist propositions not only fail to stand up to scrutiny but are rejected by many leading realists as well. He argues that rather than a general theory of international relations, realism is best seen as a philosophical orientation or research program that emphasizes - in an insightful yet one-sided way - the constraints imposed by individual and national egoism and international anarchy. Containing chapter-by-chapter guides to further reading and discussion questions for students, this book offers an accessible and lively survey of the dominant theory in International Relations.

Book
01 Dec 2000
TL;DR: Theodorizing Masculinities as discussed by the authors Theodorizing masculinity is the construction of gender identity and gender identity is a construction of identity, gender identity, and gender politics.
Abstract: List of IllustrationsAcknowledgmentsIntroductionPart I. Theorizing Masculinities1. The Construction of Gender Identity2. Masculinities and MasculinismPart II. Masculinities, IR, and Gender Politics3. Masculinities in International Relations4. The Economist's Masculine Credentials5. The Economist, Globalization, and Masculinities6. The Economist/IR IntertextConclusion: IR and the (Re)Making of Hegemonic MasculinityNotesReference List and BibliographyIndex

Book
27 Apr 2000
TL;DR: State theory in International Relations as discussed by the authors surveys realist, liberal, Marxist, constructivist and neo-Weberian approaches to the state, and places each perspective's view of the state in relation to its theory of International Relations as a whole.
Abstract: This book, first published in 2000, provides students with an overview of the main theories of the state found in International Relations. Many International Relation scholars are proclaiming the state to be 'dead', while others lament the lack of an adequate theory of the state in International Relations. John Hobson seeks to resolve this confusion by introducing readers to state theory, arguing that existing theories of the state are limited, and proposing a framework based around the 'agent-structure' debate. The book surveys realist, liberal, Marxist, constructivist and neo-Weberian approaches to the state, and places each perspective's view of the state in relation to its theory of International Relations as a whole. It offers readers a unique introduction to state theory in International Relations, and will be of interest to students and scholars of sociology and politics, as well as International Relations.

MonographDOI
Martin Shaw1
30 Nov 2000
TL;DR: The Theory of the Global State as mentioned in this paper proposes a historical, theoretical and political framework for understanding state and society in the emerging global age, which is based on the unfinished global-democratic revolution and the global-western state.
Abstract: This ambitious study rewrites the terms of debate about globalization Martin Shaw argues that the deepest meaning of globality is the growing sense of worldwide human commonality as a practical social force, arising from political struggle not technological change The book focuses upon two new concepts: the unfinished global-democratic revolution and the global-Western state Shaw shows how an internationalized, post-imperial Western state conglomerate, symbiotically linked to global institutions, is increasingly consolidated amidst worldwide democratic upheavals against authoritarian, quasi-imperial non-Western states This study explores the radical implications of these concepts for social, political and international theory, through a fundamental critique of modern ‘national-international’ social thought and dominant economistic versions of global theory Required reading for sociology and politics as well as international relations, Theory of the Global State offers a historical, theoretical and political framework for understanding state and society in the emerging global age • Major new contribution to debates about globalization, by an important scholar of international relations and sociology • The first major work from a historical sociology perspective to account for global change, and an original criticism of mainstream accounts of globalization • Will have widespread appeal to students of globalization in IR, politics, sociology and geography departments

Book
01 Jan 2000
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors recast the study of international relations into a macro-historical perspective, and set out a new theoretical agenda and a new intellectual role for the discipline.
Abstract: This book tells the story of humankind's evolution from a scattering of hunter-gatherer bands to today's integrated global international political economy Seeking to emulate and challenge the cross-disciplinary influence of the world systems model, the book recasts the study of international relations into a macro-historical perspective, shows how its core concepts work across time, and sets out a new theoretical agenda and a new intellectual role for the discipline

Book
02 May 2000
TL;DR: Odell as discussed by the authors compares ten major economic negotiations since 1944 that have involved the United States and gives the inside stories, targeting the strategies used by the negotiators, and explaining strategy choice as well as why the same strategy gains more in some situations and less in others.
Abstract: It is often said economics has become as important as security in international relations, yet we work with much less than full understanding of what goes on when government negotiators bargain over trade, finance, and the rules of international economic organizations. The process of economic negotiation shapes the world political economy, John S. Odell says, and this essential process can be understood and practiced better than it is now. His absorbing book compares ten major economic negotiations since 1944 that have involved the United States. Odell gives the inside stories, targeting the strategies used by the negotiators, and explaining strategy choice as well as why the same strategy gains more in some situations and less in others. He identifies three broad factors-changing market conditions, negotiator beliefs, and domestic politics-as key influences on strategies and outcomes. The author develops an insightful mid-range theory premised on bounded rationality, setting it apart from the most common form of rational choice as well as from views that reject rationality. Negotiating the World Economy reveals a rich set of future research paths, and closes with guidelines for improving negotiation performance today. The main ideas are relevant for any country and for all who may be affected by economic bargaining.