Showing papers by "Bastian Keck published in 2018"

Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study

Abstract: As social media are evolving rapidly online support groups (OSG) are becoming increasingly important for patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the users of traditional face-to-face support groups and OSG. We performed a cross-sectional comparison study of all regional face-to-face support groups and the largest OSG in Germany. By applying validated instruments, the survey covered sociodemographic and disease-related information, decision-making habits, psychological aspects, and quality of life. We analyzed the complete data of 955 patients visiting face-to-face support groups and 686 patients using OSG. Patients using OSG were 6 years younger (65.3 vs. 71.5 years; p < 0.001), had higher education levels (47 vs. 21%; p < 0.001), and had higher income. Patients using OSG reported a higher share of metastatic disease (17 vs. 12%; p < 0.001). Patients using OSG reported greater distress. There were no significant differences in anxiety, depression, and global quality of life. In the face-to-face support groups, patient ratings were better for exchanging information, gaining recognition, and caring for others. Patients using OSG demanded a more active role in the treatment decision-making process (58 vs. 33%; p < 0.001) and changed their initial treatment decision more frequently (29 vs. 25%; p < 0.001). Both modalities of peer support received very positive ratings by their users and have significant impact on treatment decision-making. Older patients might benefit more from the continuous social support in face-to-face support groups. OSG offer low-threshold advice for acute problems to younger and better educated patients with high distress. www.germanctr.de , number DRKS00005086

Molecular Markers Increase Precision of the European Association of Urology Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Progression Risk Groups

Abstract: Purpose: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recommend risk stratification based on clinicopathologic parameters. Our aim was to inve ...

mRNA-Expression of KRT5 and KRT20 Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer Correlating with Histological Variants

Abstract: Recently, muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has been subclassified by gene expression profiling, with a substantial impact on therapy response and patient outcome. We tested whether these complex molecular subtypes of MIBC can be determined by mRNA detection of keratin 5 (KRT5) and keratin 20 (KRT20). Reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was applied to quantify gene expression of KRT5 and KRT20 using TaqMan®-based assays in 122 curatively treated MIBC patients (median age 68.0 years). Furthermore, in silico analysis of the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) cohort (GSE48277 + GSE47993) was performed. High expression of KRT5 and low expression of KRT20 were associated with significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival disease specific survival (DSS: 5-year DSS for KRT5 high: 58%; 5-year DSS for KRT20 high: 29%). KRT5 and KRT20 were associated with rates of lymphovascular invasion and lymphonodal metastasis. The combination of KRT5 and KRT20 allowed identification of patients with a very poor prognosis (KRT20+/KRT5−, 5-year DSS 0%, p < 0.0001). In silico analysis of the independent MDACC cohorts revealed congruent results (5-year DSS for KRT20 low vs. high: 84% vs. 40%, p = 0.042). High KRT20-expressing tumors as well as KRT20+/KRT− tumors were significantly enriched with aggressive urothelial carcinoma variants (micropapillary, plasmacytoid, nested).

A multicenter round robin test of PD-L1 expression assessment in urothelial bladder cancer by immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR with emphasis on prognosis prediction after radical cystectomy.

Abstract: // Markus Eckstein 1, * , Ralph M. Wirtz 2, 3, * , Carolin Pfannstil 1, * , Sven Wach 4, * , Robert Stoehr 1, * , Johannes Breyer 6, * , Franziska Erlmeier 7, * , Cagatay Gunes 8, * , Katja Nitschke 5, * , Wilko Weichert 7, * , Wolfgang Otto 6, * , Bastian Keck 4, * , Sebastian Eidt 3, * , Maximilian Burger 6, * , Helge Taubert 4, * , Bernd Wullich 4, * , Christian Bolenz 8, * , Arndt Hartmann 1, * and Philipp Erben 5, * 1 Institute of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany 2 STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne, Germany 3 Institute of Pathology at The St. Elisabeth Hospital Koln-Hohenlind, Cologne, Germany 4 Department of Urology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany 5 Department of Urology Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany 6 Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany 7 Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany 8 Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany * On behalf of the BRIDGE-Consortium Germany Correspondence to: Markus Eckstein, email: markus.eckstein@uk-erlangen.de Keywords: bladder cancer; PD-L1; checkpoint inhibitors; molecular therapy stratification; immunohistochemistry Received: October 26, 2017 Accepted: February 10, 2018 Epub: February 19, 2018 Published: March 13, 2018 ABSTRACT Background: Immunohistochemical PD-L1 assessment is currently used to identify responders towards checkpoint inhibitors although it is limited by inter-observer effects. Here, we conducted a multi-center round robin test to prove the possibility of assessing the PD-L1 status by gene expression to avoid inter-observer effects. Patients and methods: Gene expression of PD-L1 was analyzed in a total of 294 samples (14 cases non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer; MIBC) in seven centers by a RT-qPCR kit and compared with immunohistochemical scoring of three pathologists (DAKO, 22c3). Both assays were compared towards prognosis prediction in a cohort of 88 patients with MIBC. Results: PD-L1 gene expression revealed very high inter center correlation (centrally extracted RNA: r = 0.68–0.98, p ≤ 0.0076; locally extracted RNA: r = 0.81–0.98, p ≤ 0.0014). IHC Inter-observer concordance was moderate to substantial for immune cells (IC), fair for combined IC/ tumor cell (TC) (IC: κ = 0.50–0.61; IC + TC: κ = 0.50), and fair for TC scoring (κ = 0.26–0.35). Gene expression assessment resulted in more positive cases (9/14 cases positive vs. 6/14 cases [IHC]) which could be validated in the independent cohort. Positive mRNA status was associated with significantly better overall and disease-specific survival (5-year OS: 50% vs. 26%, p = 0.0042, HR = 0.48; 5 year DSS: 65% vs. 40%, p = 0.012, HR = 0.49). The 1% IHC IC cut-off also revealed significant better OS (5 year OS: 58% vs. 31%, p = 0.036, HR = 0.62). Conclusion: Gene expression showed very high inter-center agreement. Gene expression assessment also resulted in more positive cases and revealed better prognosis prediction. PD-L1 mRNA expression seems to be a reproducible and robust tool for PD-L1 assessment.