scispace - formally typeset
G

Gordon Pennycook

Researcher at University of Regina

Publications -  139
Citations -  17092

Gordon Pennycook is an academic researcher from University of Regina. The author has contributed to research in topics: Misinformation & Cognitive style. The author has an hindex of 45, co-authored 120 publications receiving 10133 citations. Previous affiliations of Gordon Pennycook include University of Waterloo & University of Saskatchewan.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Jay J. Van Bavel, +42 more
TL;DR: Evidence from a selection of research topics relevant to pandemics is discussed, including work on navigating threats, social and cultural influences on behaviour, science communication, moral decision-making, leadership, and stress and coping.
Journal ArticleDOI

The science of fake news

TL;DR: The rise of fake news highlights the erosion of long-standing institutional bulwarks against misinformation in the internet age as discussed by the authors. But much remains unknown regarding the vulnerabilities of individuals, institutions, and society to manipulations by malicious actors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.

TL;DR: The results, which mirror those found previously for political fake news, suggest that nudging people to think about accuracy is a simple way to improve choices about what to share on social media.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.

TL;DR: This article found that cognitive reflection test performance is negatively correlated with perceived accuracy of fake news, and positively correlated with the ability to distinguish fake news from real news, even for headlines that align with individuals' political ideology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning

TL;DR: This paper found that cognitive reflection test performance is negatively correlated with perceived accuracy of fake news, and positively correlated with the ability to distinguish fake news from real news, even for headlines that align with individuals' political ideology.