Showing papers by "Isabelle C. Van Gelder published in 2016"

2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS

Abstract: The Task Force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC Endorsed by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO)

EACVI/EHRA Expert Consensus Document on the role of multi-modality imaging for the evaluation of patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest cardiac rhythm disorder. Evaluation of patients with AF requires an electrocardiogram, but imaging techniques should be considered for defining management and driving treatment. The present document is an expert consensus from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association. The clinical value of echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), computed tomography (CT), and nuclear imaging in AF patients are challenged. Left atrial (LA) volume and strain in echocardiography as well as assessment of LA fibrosis in CMR are discussed. The value of CT, especially in planning interventions, is highlighted. Fourteen consensus statements have been reached. These may serve as a guide for both imagers and electrophysiologists for best selecting the imaging technique and for best interpreting its results in AF patients.

A roadmap to improve the quality of atrial fibrillation management: proceedings from the fifth Atrial Fibrillation Network/European Heart Rhythm Association consensus conference.

Abstract: At least 30 million people worldwide carry a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), and many more suffer from undiagnosed, subclinical, or 'silent' AF. Atrial fibrillation-related cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, including cardiovascular deaths, heart failure, stroke, and hospitalizations, remain unacceptably high, even when evidence-based therapies such as anticoagulation and rate control are used. Furthermore, it is still necessary to define how best to prevent AF, largely due to a lack of clinical measures that would allow identification of treatable causes of AF in any given patient. Hence, there are important unmet clinical and research needs in the evaluation and management of AF patients. The ensuing needs and opportunities for improving the quality of AF care were discussed during the fifth Atrial Fibrillation Network/European Heart Rhythm Association consensus conference in Nice, France, on 22 and 23 January 2015. Here, we report the outcome of this conference, with a focus on (i) learning from our 'neighbours' to improve AF care, (ii) patient-centred approaches to AF management, (iii) structured care of AF patients, (iv) improving the quality of AF treatment, and (v) personalization of AF management. This report ends with a list of priorities for research in AF patients.

Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in 'real-world' patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract: Aims Randomized trials showed non-inferior or superior results of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) vs. acenocoumarol (vitamin K antagonist) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in daily clinical practice. Methods and results In this observational study, we evaluated all consecutive patients who started anticoagulation because of AF in our outpatient clinic from 2010 to 2013. Data were collected from electronic patient charts. Primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding. Propensity score matching was applied to address the non-randomized design. In total, 920 consecutive AF patients were enrolled (442 dabigatran, 478 acenocoumarol), of which 2 × 383 were available for analysis after propensity score matching. Mean follow-up duration was 1.5 ± 0.56 year. The mean calculated stroke risk according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.5%/year in dabigatran vs. 3.7%/year acenocoumarol-treated patients. The actual incidence rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 0.8%/year [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2–2.1] vs. 1.0%/year (95% CI: 0.4–2.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed this lower but non-significant risk in dabigatran vs. acenocoumarol after adjustment for the CHA2DS2-VASc score [hazard ratio (HR)dabigatran = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.20–2.63, P = 0.61]. According to the HAS-BLED score, the mean calculated bleeding risk was 1.7%/year in both groups. Actual incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.1%/year (95% CI: 1.0–3.8) in the dabigatran vs. 4.3%/year (95% CI: 2.9–6.2) in acenocoumarol. This over 50% reduction remained significant after adjustment for the HAS-BLED score (HRdabigatran = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.93, P = 0.031). Conclusion In ‘real-world’ patients with AF, dabigatran appears to be as effective, but significantly safer than acenocoumarol . [10.1093/europace/euv415][1] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1093/europace/euv415

Sudden cardiac death in adult congenital heart disease: Can the unpredictable be foreseen?

Abstract: Aims Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major cause of mortality in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). Several risk factors for SCD including conduction disturbances and ventricular dysfunction have been described previously. However, electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiographic parameters may change over time, and the predictive value of such temporal changes, rather than their point estimates, for SCD remains unknown. Methods and results This was a retrospective case–control study in adults with CHD and proven or presumed SCD and matched controls. Data were obtained from three databases including 25 000 adults with CHD. Sequential measurements were performed on electrocardiograms and echocardiograms. Ventricular function was assessed by echocardiography and graded on a four-point ordinal scale: 1, normal [ejection fraction (EF) ≥50%]; 2, mildly impaired (EF 40–49%); 3, moderately impaired (EF 30–39%); and 4, severely impaired (EF < 30%). Overall, 131 SCDs (mean age 36 ± 14 years, 67% male) and 260 controls (mean age 37 ± 13 years, 63% male) were included. At baseline, median QRS duration was 108 ms (range 58–168 ms) in SCDs and 97 ms (range 50–168 ms) in controls and increased over time at a rate of 1.6 ± 0.5 vs. 0.5 ± 0.2 ms/year in SCDs and controls, respectively ( P = 0.011). QT dispersion at baseline was 61 ms (range 31–168 ms) in SCDs and 50 ms (range 21–129 ms) in controls. QT dispersion increased at a rate of 1.1 ± 0.4 ms/year in SCD victims and decreased at a rate of 0.2 ± 0.2 ms/year in controls ( P = 0.004). Increase of QRS duration ≥5 ms/year was associated with an increased risk of SCD [OR 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–3.3, P = 0.013]. Change from any baseline systemic ventricular function (normal, mild, or moderately impaired) to severe ventricular dysfunction over time was associated with the highest risk of SCD (OR 16.9, 95% CI 1.8–120.1, P = 0.008). Conclusion In adults with CHD, QRS duration and ventricular dysfunction progress over time. Progression of QRS duration and the rate of impairment of ventricular function served to identify those at increased risk of SCD.

Atrial reverse remodelling is associated with outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Abstract: Aims To study the prognostic effect of atrial reverse remodelling on outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods and results Patients receiving a CRT device in the University Medical Centre Groningen were included. Atrial reverse remodelling was defined as a ≥10% reduction in left atrial volume index at 6-month follow-up. Success of CRT was defined as ventricular reverse remodelling with a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume of ≥15% at 6-month follow-up. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalizations. A total of 365 patients (mean age 65.1 ± 11.0 years, 73% men) were included; among them, 221 (61%) were in sinus rhythm and had no prior atrial fibrillation (AF), and 144 patients (39%) had a history of AF. During a mean follow up of 2.0 ± 1.0 years, 49 patients died. Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with no atrial and no ventricular reverse remodelling had the worst outcome (hazard ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4–7.1, P = 0.006). Outcome in patients with only atrial reverse remodelling was comparable with outcome in patients with both atrial and ventricular reverse remodelling (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 0.7–5.6, P = 0.21). Conclusion Patients without atrial and ventricular reverse remodelling have the worst outcome. Patients with only atrial reverse remodelling have improved left ventricular diastolic filling during follow-up and demonstrate a comparable outcome with patients with both atrial and ventricular reverse remodelling. Assessment of atrial reverse remodelling may provide additional prognostic information in determining CRT outcome.

Clinical, biomarker, and genetic predictors of specific types of atrial fibrillation in a community-based cohort: data of the PREVEND study

Abstract: Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) may present variously in time, and AF may progress from self-terminating to non-self-terminating AF, and is associated with impaired prognosis. However, predictors of AF types are largely unexplored. We investigate the clinical, biomarker, and genetic predictors of development of specific types of AF in a community-based cohort. Methods We included 8042 individuals (319 with incident AF) of the PREVEND study. Types of AF were compared, and multivariate multinomial regression analysis determined associations with specific types of AF. Results Mean age was 48.5 ± 12.4 years and 50% were men. The types of incident AF were ascertained based on electrocardiograms; 103(32%) were classified as AF without 2-year recurrence, 158(50%) as self-terminating AF, and 58(18%) as non-self-terminating AF. With multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis, advancing age ( P < 0.001 for all three types) was associated with all AF types, male sex was associated with AF without 2-year recurrence and self-terminating AF ( P = 0.031 and P = 0.008, respectively). Increasing body mass index and MR-proANP were associated with both self-terminating ( P = 0.009 and P < 0.001) and non-self-terminating AF ( P = 0.003 and P < 0.001). The only predictor associated with solely self-terminating AF is prescribed anti-hypertensive treatment ( P = 0.019). The following predictors were associated with non-self-terminating AF; lower heart rate ( P = 0.018), lipid-lowering treatment prescribed ( P = 0.009), and eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ( P = 0.006). Three known AF-genetic variants (rs6666258, rs6817105, and rs10821415) were associated with self-terminating AF. Conclusions We found clinical, biomarker and genetic predictors of specific types of incident AF in a community-based cohort. The genetic background seems to play a more important role than modifiable risk factors in self-terminating AF.

Regional differences in referral, procedures, and outcome after ablation for atrial fibrillation in Europe: a report from the Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Pilot Registry of the European Society of Cardiology

Abstract: Aims Ablation is an effective treatment of symptomatic and drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Using data from the European AF Ablation Pilot Registry comprising 1410 patients from 10 European countries, we prospectively investigated regional differences in AF ablation regarding patient selection, ablation strategy, and outcome. Methods and results Countries were divided into three regions: South (Greece, Italy, Spain), East (Czech Republic, Poland), and West/North (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, and the Netherlands). One-year success was defined as patient survival free from atrial arrhythmia, with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD). In all regions, patients were symptomatic and treated extensively with beta-blockers and AAD pre-ablation. Patients in East had more co-morbidity, increased thromboembolic risk, were more likely to have paroxysmal AF, and they underwent more left atrial linear ablations. Adverse events remained within expected levels, albeit with a significantly higher reporting of adverse cardiovascular events in the West/North (4.7 vs. 1.4 and 1.5% in South and East, P = 0.0032). There was no significant difference in peripheral/vascular, neurological, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, or general adverse events. The 1-year success rate after ablation differed non-statistically between regions ranging from 69.1 to 74.7%. A second ablation was performed in 23.2% in West/North compared with 10.5 and 16.5% in South and East. The proportion of patients still on AADs was highest in the South region (51.6 vs. 42.3 and 38.8% in East and West/North). Conclusion This study with all-comer patients shows that patient selection for ablation follows current guidelines but reveals significant differences regarding co-morbidity, medication, and ablation strategy. Despite this, 1-year outcomes are without significant differences and in line with previously published clinical trials.

Cluster Individuals Based on Phenotype and Determine the Risk for Atrial Fibrillation in the PREVEND and Framingham Heart Study Populations.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Risk prediction of atrial fibrillation (AF) is of importance to improve the early diagnosis and treatment of AF. Latent class analysis takes into account the possible existence of classes of individuals each with shared risk factors, and maybe a better method of incorporating the phenotypic heterogeneity underlying AF. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Two prospective community-based cohort studies from Netherlands and United States were used. Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (PREVEND) study, started in 1997, and the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring cohort started in 1971, both with 10-years follow-up. The main objective was to determine the risk of AF using a latent class analysis, and compare the discrimination and reclassification performance with traditional regression analysis. Mean age in PREVEND was 49±13 years, 49.8% were men. During follow-up, 250(3%) individuals developed AF. We built a latent class model based on 18 risk factors. A model with 7 distinct classes (ranging from 341 to 1517 individuals) gave the optimum tradeoff between a high statistical model-likelihood and a low number of model parameters. All classes had a specific profile. The incidence of AF varied; class 1 0.0%, class 2 0.3%, class 3 7.5%, class 4 0.2%, class 5 1.3%, class 6 4.2%, class 7 21.7% (p<0.001). The discrimination (C-statistic 0.830 vs. 0.842, delta-C -0.013, p = 0.22) and reclassification (IDI -0.028, p<0.001, NRI -0.090, p = 0.049, and category-less-NRI -0.049, p = 0.495) performance of both models was comparable. The results were successfully replicated in a sample of the FHS study (n = 3162; mean age 58±9 years, 46.3% men). CONCLUSIONS: Latent class analysis to build an AF risk model is feasible. Despite the heterogeneity in number and severity of risk factors between individuals at risk for AF, latent class analysis produces distinguishable groups.

Still many unanswered questions about rate control therapy in atrial fibrillation

Abstract: Commentary on: Chao TF, Liu CJ, Tuan TC, et al. Rate-control treatment and mortality in atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2015;132:1604–12[OpenUrl][1][Abstract/FREE Full Text][2]. Pharmacological management of heart rate, the mainstay of treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), is subjected to ongoing controversy.1 Two important questions yet to be answered in rate control therapy are; what constitutes the optimal heart rate during AF and which rate controlling drug should be instituted in the individual patient. Optimal heart rate in AF has been studied in one large randomised trial, the Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RACE II) study, which compared lenient versus strict rate control. RACE II showed that a lenient approach to rate control is easy, safe and effective and should be considered as an initial approach for those with few symptoms.2 However, randomised controlled trials on … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DCirculation%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1161%252FCIRCULATIONAHA.114.013709%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F26384160%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=circulationaha&resid=132/17/1604&atom=%2Febmed%2F21%2F5%2F180.atom