scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Isabelle C. Van Gelder published in 2019"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Clinically diagnosed AF after a stroke or a transient ischemic attack is associated with significantly increased risk of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism, in particular, with additional stroke risk factors, and requires OAC rather than antiplatelet therapy.
Abstract: Cardiac thromboembolism attributed to atrial fibrillation (AF) is responsible for up to one-third of ischemic strokes. Stroke may be the first manifestation of previously undetected AF. Given the efficacy of oral anticoagulants in preventing AF-related ischemic strokes, strategies of searching for AF after a stroke using ECG monitoring followed by oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment have been proposed to prevent recurrent cardioembolic strokes. This white paper by experts from the AF-SCREEN International Collaboration summarizes existing evidence and knowledge gaps on searching for AF after a stroke by using ECG monitoring. New AF can be detected by routine plus intensive ECG monitoring in approximately one-quarter of patients with ischemic stroke. It may be causal, a bystander, or neurogenically induced by the stroke. AF after a stroke is a risk factor for thromboembolism and a strong marker for atrial myopathy. After acute ischemic stroke, patients should undergo 72 hours of electrocardiographic monitoring to detect AF. The diagnosis requires an ECG of sufficient quality for confirmation by a health professional with ECG rhythm expertise. AF detection rate is a function of monitoring duration and quality of analysis, AF episode definition, interval from stroke to monitoring commencement, and patient characteristics including old age, certain ECG alterations, and stroke type. Markers of atrial myopathy (eg, imaging, atrial ectopy, natriuretic peptides) may increase AF yield from monitoring and could be used to guide patient selection for more intensive/prolonged poststroke ECG monitoring. Atrial myopathy without detected AF is not currently sufficient to initiate OAC. The concept of embolic stroke of unknown source is not proven to identify patients who have had a stroke benefitting from empiric OAC treatment. However, some embolic stroke of unknown source subgroups (eg, advanced age, atrial enlargement) might benefit more from non-vitamin K-dependent OAC therapy than aspirin. Fulfilling embolic stroke of unknown source criteria is an indication neither for empiric non-vitamin K-dependent OAC treatment nor for withholding prolonged ECG monitoring for AF. Clinically diagnosed AF after a stroke or a transient ischemic attack is associated with significantly increased risk of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism, in particular, with additional stroke risk factors, and requires OAC rather than antiplatelet therapy. The minimum subclinical AF duration required on ECG monitoring poststroke/transient ischemic attack to recommend OAC therapy is debated.

173 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data suggest that nurse-led care by an experienced team could be clinically beneficial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01740037), and it is proposed that usual-care patients with atrial fibrillation should be switched to nurse- led care.
Abstract: Background Nurse-led integrated care is expected to improve outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation compared with usualcare provided by a medical specialist. Methods and results We randomized 1375 patients with atrial fibrillation (64 ± 10 years, 44% women, 57% had CHA2DS2-VASc >- 2) to receive nurse-led care or usual-care. Nurse-led care was provided by specialized nurses using a decision-support tool, in consultation with the cardiologist. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and cardiovascular hospital admissions. Of 671 nurse-led care patients, 543 (81%) received anticoagulation in full accordance with the guidelines against 559 of 683 (82%) usual-care patients. The cumulative adherence to guidelinesbased recommendations was 61% under nurse-led care and 26% under usual-care. Over 37 months of follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 164 of 671 patients (9.7% per year) under nurse-led care and in 192 of 683 patients (11.6% per year) under usual-care [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 1.04, P = 0.12]. There were 124 vs. 161 hospitalizations for arrhythmia events (7.0% and 9.4% per year), and 14 vs. 22 for heart failure (0.7% and 1.1% per year), respectively. Results were not consistent in a pre-specified subgroup analysis by centre experience, with a HR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.37-to 0.71) in four experienced centres and of 1.24 (95% CI 0.94-1.63) in four less experienced centres (P for interaction <0.001). Conclusion Our trial failed to show that nurse-led care was superior to usual-care. The data suggest that nurse-led care by an experienced team could be clinically beneficial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01740037).

55 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence supporting the use of rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation ablation for different outcomes is summarized, implications for indications are discussed, and remaining clinical gaps in evidence are highlighted.
Abstract: Recent innovations have the potential to improve rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Controlled trials provide new evidence on the effectiveness and safety of rhythm control therapy, particularly in patients with AF and heart failure. This review summarizes evidence supporting the use of rhythm control therapy in patients with AF for different outcomes, discusses implications for indications, and highlights remaining clinical gaps in evidence. Rhythm control therapy improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with symptomatic AF and can be safely delivered in elderly patients with comorbidities (mean age 70 years, 3-7% complications at 1 year). Atrial fibrillation ablation maintains sinus rhythm more effectively than antiarrhythmic drug therapy, but recurrent AF remains common, highlighting the need for better patient selection (precision medicine). Antiarrhythmic drugs remain effective after AF ablation, underpinning the synergistic mechanisms of action of AF ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs. Atrial fibrillation ablation appears to improve left ventricular function in a subset of patients with AF and heart failure. Data on the prognostic effect of rhythm control therapy are heterogeneous without a clear signal for either benefit or harm. Rhythm control therapy has acceptable safety and improves quality of life in patients with symptomatic AF, including in elderly populations with stroke risk factors. There is a clinical need to better stratify patients for rhythm control therapy. Further studies are needed to determine whether rhythm control therapy, and particularly AF ablation, improves left ventricular function and reduces AF-related complications.

52 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2019-Europace
TL;DR: The present EHRA White Paper summarizes knowledge gaps in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/sudden death and heart failure.
Abstract: Clinicians accept that there are many unknowns when we make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Acceptance of uncertainty is essential for the pursuit of the profession: bedside decisions must often be made on the basis of incomplete evidence. Over the years, physicians sometimes even do not realize anymore which the fundamental gaps in our knowledge are. As clinical scientists, however, we have to halt and consider what we do not know yet, and how we can move forward addressing those unknowns. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) believes that scanning the field of arrhythmia / cardiac electrophysiology to identify knowledge gaps which are not yet the subject of organized research, should be undertaken on a regular basis. Such a review (White Paper) should concentrate on research which is feasible, realistic, and clinically relevant, and should not deal with futuristic aspirations. It fits with the EHRA mission that these White Papers should be shared on a global basis in order to foster collaborative and needed research which will ultimately lead to better care for our patients. The present EHRA White Paper summarizes knowledge gaps in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/sudden death and heart failure.

39 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Analysis of the acute changes in HRV caused by RNS before and after RDN suggested a lower sympathetic autonomic balance, which could support RNS-guided RDN to optimize results.
Abstract: Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) is used to localize sympathetic nerve tissue for selective renal nerve sympathetic denervation (RDN). Examination of heart rate variability (HRV) provides a way to assess the state of the autonomic nervous system. The current study aimed to examine the acute changes in HRV caused by RNS before and after RDN. 30 patients with hypertension referred for RDN were included. RNS was performed under general anesthesia before and after RDN. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were continuously monitored. HRV characteristics were assessed 1 min before and after RNS and RDN. RNS before RDN elicited a maximum increase in systolic BP of 45 (± 22) mmHg which was attenuated to 13 (± 12) mmHg (p < 0.001) after RDN. RNS before RDN decreased the sinus cycle length from 1210 (± 201) ms to 1170 (± 203) ms (p = 0.03), after RDN this effect was blunted (p = 0.59). The LF/HF ratio in response to RNS changed from ∆ + 0.448 (± 0.550) before RDN to ∆ − 0.656 (± 0.252) after RDN (p = 0.02). Selecting patients off beta-blockade (n = 11), the RNS-induced changes in HRV components before versus after RDN were more pronounced (LF/HF ratio ∆ + 0.900 ± 1.171 versus ∆ − 0.828 ± 0.519, p = 0.01), whereas changes in HRV parameters in patients on beta-blockade (n = 19) were no longer significant. In patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 7), RNS induced no changes in HRV parameters (LF/HF ratio ∆ − 0.039 ± 0.103 versus ∆ − 0.460 ± 0.491, p = 0.92). RNS induces changes in HRV suggesting increased sympathetic activity. Conversely, after RDN, the RNS-induced changes in HRV suggesting a lower sympathetic autonomic balance. These changes were most pronounced in beta-blocker naive patients and not present in patients with diabetes mellitus. These findings could support RNS-guided RDN to optimize results.

25 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Apr 2019-Europace
TL;DR: A strategy aiming to treat underlying conditions improved QoL more compared with conventional therapy in patients with early persistent AF and HF, and its benefit was even observed in patients in AF at 1 year.
Abstract: AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces quality of life (QoL). We aim to evaluate effects of targeted therapy of underlying conditions on QoL in patients with AF and heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: The Routine versus Aggressive risk factor driven upstream rhythm Control for prevention of Early atrial fibrillation in heart failure (RACE 3) study randomized patients with early persistent AF and HF to targeted or conventional therapy. Both groups received guideline-driven treatment. The targeted group received four additional therapies: mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; statins; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and/or receptor blockers; and cardiac rehabilitation including physical activity, dietary restrictions, and counselling. Quality of life was analysed in 230 patients at baseline and 1 year with available Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), University of Toronto AF Severity Scale (AFSS) questionnaires, and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) class. Improvements in SF-36 subscales were larger in the targeted group for physical functioning (Δ12 ± 19 vs. Δ6 ± 22, P = 0.007), physical role limitations (Δ32 ± 41 vs. Δ17 ± 45, P = 0.018), and general health (Δ8 ± 16 vs. Δ0 ± 17, P < 0.001). Dyspnoea at rest improved more (Δ-0.8 ± 1.3 vs. Δ-0.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.018) and EHRA class was lower at 1-year follow-up in the targeted group. Patients with AF at 1 year, improvement in physical functioning (Δ9 ± 9 vs. Δ-3 ± 16, P = 0.001), general health (Δ7 ± 16 vs. Δ-7 ± 19, P = 0.004), and social functioning (Δ6 ± 23 vs. Δ-4 ± 16, P = 0.041) were larger in the targeted group. CONCLUSION: A strategy aiming to treat underlying conditions improved QoL more compared with conventional therapy in patients with early persistent AF and HF. Its benefit was even observed in patients in AF at 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00877643.

18 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Pre‐procedurally identifying patients at risk of AF recurrence could be beneficial, and cryoballoon isolation is considered a safe and effective treatment for atrial fibrillation.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon isolation is considered a safe and effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, recurrence of AF after first cryoballoon ablation occurs in ~30% of patients. Pre-procedurally identifying patients at risk of AF recurrence could be beneficial. HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to determine how pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy influences the recurrence of AF using the second-generation cryoballoon in patients with paroxysmal AF. METHODS: We included 88 consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI procedure with a second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon. All patients were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months using a 12-lead ECG and 24-hour Holter monitoring. Pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy was assessed by creating three dimensional models using computed tomography (CT) segmentations of the left atrium. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (61%) had left PVs with a shared carina, 35 patients (42%) had a shared right carina. Nine patients (11%) were classified having a right middle PV. In total 17 (20.2%) of patients had a left common PV. At 12 months, 14 patients (17%) had experienced AF recurrence. Neither PV ovality, variant anatomy, the presence of shared carina nor a common left pulmonary vein was a predictor for AF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: No specific characteristics of PV dimensions nor morphology were associated with AF recurrence after cryoballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

9 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Following beta-blocker uptitration, both achieved and change in heart rate were prognostically significant regardless of starting heart rate in SR, however, they were only significant in AF patients with high baseline heart rate.
Abstract: In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on sub-optimal doses of beta-blockers, it is conceivable that changes in heart rate following treatment intensification might be important regardless of underlying heart rhythm. We aimed to compare the prognostic significance of both achieved heart rate and change in heart rate following beta-blocker uptitration in patients with HFrEF either in sinus rhythm (SR) or atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed a post hoc analysis of the BIOSTAT-CHF study. We evaluated 1548 patients with HFrEF (mean age 67 years, 35% AF). Median follow-up was 21 months. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 9 months. The combined primary outcome was all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation stratified by heart rhythm and heart rate at baseline. Despite similar changes in heart rate and beta-blocker dose, a decrease in heart rate at 9 months was associated with reduced incidence of the primary outcome in both SR and AF patients [HR per 10 bpm decrease—SR: 0.83 (0.75–0.91), p < 0.001; AF: 0.89 (0.81–0.98), p = 0.018], whereas the relationship was less strong for achieved heart rate in AF [HR per 10 bpm higher—SR: 1.26 (1.10–1.46), p = 0.001; AF: 1.08 (0.94–1.23), p = 0.18]. Achieved heart rate at 9 months was only prognostically significant in AF patients with high baseline heart rates (p for interaction 0.017 vs. low). Following beta-blocker uptitration, both achieved and change in heart rate were prognostically significant regardless of starting heart rate in SR, however, they were only significant in AF patients with high baseline heart rate.

9 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Clinical patient profile is different between the sexes but did not result in differences in cardiovascular outcome in patients with young-onset atrial fibrillation.

7 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed to use ECG and Holter monitor-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic clinical AF.
Abstract: Stroke is a devastating complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) the odds of which can be reduced by use of oral anticoagulation based on the stroke risk score.1,2 Patients with asymptomatic clinical AF have a similar stroke risk as patients with symptomatic clinical AF.3 Thus far, electrocardiographic- (ECG) or Holter monitor-detected AF is a prerequisite before use of oral anticoagulation,1,2 because the guideline recommendations are based on studies that included only ECG- or Holter-detected AF ('clinical' AF).1,2 In the past decades increasing number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) have been implanted in patients with cardiovascular diseases, predominantly driven by expanding indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy, and implantable loop recorders. These CIEDs can detect atrial high rate episodes i.e. atrial arrhythmias.4-6 As a consequence of continuous monitoring by these devices, the detection threshold for atrial tachyarrhythmias or AF has decreased dramatically. However, AF-detection algorithms, sensitivity, and specificity vary between CIEDs, and this may have its impact on the usage for AF detection purposes.7.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results show that QRS area is useful for stratification of outcomes to CRT in both LBBB and non-LBBB subpopulations, and Dr Vereckei claims that their novel ECG dyssychrony marker may be as strong a predictor of CRT response as QRS Area.
Abstract: April 2019 1 Antonius M.W. van Stipdonk, MD Iris ter Horst, MD, PhD Marielle Kloosterman, BSc Elien B. Engels, PhD Michiel Rienstra, MD, PhD Harry J.G.M. Crijns, MD, PhD Marc A. Vos, PhD Isabelle C. van Gelder, MD, PhD Frits W. Prinzen, PhD Mathias Meine, MD, PhD Alexander Maass, MD, PhD Kevin Vernooy, MD, PhD In Response: We thank Dr Vereckei for his interest in our article.1 In his letter, he states that QRS area does not have added value in left bundle branch block (LBBB) or non-LBBB patients separately. However, this is not what can be concluded from our study. Indeed, we stated that the clinically most relevant subpopulation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients currently are those that do not have a Class I indication for CRT, as uncertainty about benefit or harm exists in this population. However, our results do show that QRS area is useful for stratification of outcomes to CRT in both LBBB and non-LBBB subpopulations. For this we would like to draw attention to Figure 3C and 3D of the article, which show highly significant separation of the survival curves between patients with QRS area above and below the median value in both LBBB and non-LBBB patients. Statistical analysis revealed that QRS area provides even better association with outcome compared with the combination of QRS duration and the presence of LBBB. These findings were recently supported by results from a prospective Dutch multicenter, multimarker study2 and a large retrospective database from Duke University.3 Dr Vereckei claims that their novel ECG dyssychrony marker may be as strong a predictor of CRT response as QRS area. Their marker consists of the time from onset of the QRS to the intrinsicoid deflection in V1, V5, aVL, and aVF. 4 We think that it is too early to make such strong statement based on a relatively small (124 patients) single-center study. Moreover, their method depends on subjective manual measurements. Similar to the assessment of QRS morphology5 and duration,6 this creates considerable interobserver variability. This is supported by their reported interobserver disagreement in 12 of 124 patients in their analysis. QRS area on the contrary has a low variability because in the regions of uncertainty (onset and end of QRS complex), amplitudes are low. Although QRS area was measured semiautomatically in our study, it has the potential to be measured completely automatically in the current ECG systems because these systems already determine QRS onset and end, and contain the software to convert the 12lead ECG into the Frank vectorcardiogram. In this light, we like to position QRS area as a standalone marker. Only a prospective study is missing to advocate QRS area as part of guidelines for selection of CRT patients.