scispace - formally typeset
K

Kit S. Double

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  24
Citations -  861

Kit S. Double is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Emotional intelligence & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 20 publications receiving 416 citations. Previous affiliations of Kit S. Double include University of Sydney Faculty of Education and Social Work & University of Sydney.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Emotional intelligence predicts academic performance: A meta-analysis.

TL;DR: It is proposed that three mechanisms underlie the EI/academic performance link: regulating academic emotions, building social relationships at school, and (c) academic content overlap with EI.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies

TL;DR: In this article, a meta-analysis of the effect of peer assessment on academic performance in primary, secondary, or tertiary students across subjects and domains is presented. And the results suggest that peer assessment improves academic performance compared with no assessment (g = 0.31, p =.004) and teacher assessment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Action Video Games Improve Reading Abilities and Visual-To-Auditory Attentional Shifting in English-speaking Children With Dyslexia

TL;DR: It is shown that an enhancement of visuo-spatial attention and phonological working memory, and an acceleration of visual-to-auditory attentional shifting can directly translate into better reading in English-speaking children with dyslexia.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Confidence Database

Dobromir Rahnev, +91 more
TL;DR: The Confidence Database as mentioned in this paper is a large collection of confidence studies spanning a broad set of paradigms, participant populations and fields of study, which can be easily imported and analyzed using multiple software packages.
Journal ArticleDOI

A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning.

TL;DR: The results indicate that researchers should be aware that eliciting JoL may well influence participants’ underlying encoding processes, especially when using related word pairs or word lists.