scispace - formally typeset
K

Klaus H Guber

Researcher at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Publications -  91
Citations -  4434

Klaus H Guber is an academic researcher from Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The author has contributed to research in topics: Neutron & Nuclear data. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 84 publications receiving 3472 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data

TL;DR: The ENDF/B-VII.1 library as mentioned in this paper is the most widely used data set for nuclear data analysis and has been updated several times over the last five years. But the most recent version of the ENDF-B-VI.0 library is based on the JENDL-4.0 standard.
Journal ArticleDOI

ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data

David Brown, +69 more
- 01 Feb 2018 - 
TL;DR: The new ENDF/B-VIII.0 evaluated nuclear reaction data library as mentioned in this paper includes improved thermal neutron scattering data and uses new evaluated data from the CIELO project for neutron reactions on 1 H, 16 O, 56 Fe, 235 U, 238 U and 239 Pu described in companion papers.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Karlsruhe 4π barium fluoride detector

TL;DR: The Karlsruhe 4π barium fluoride detector as discussed by the authors was used for nuclear astrophysics to investigate the origin of the heavy elements in the slow neutron capture process using the pulsed proton beam of a Van de Graaff accelerator.
Journal ArticleDOI

CIELO Collaboration Summary Results: International Evaluations of Neutron Reactions on Uranium, Plutonium, Iron, Oxygen and Hydrogen

Mark B. Chadwick, +76 more
- 01 Feb 2018 - 
TL;DR: The CIELO collaboration as discussed by the authors studied neutron cross sections on nuclides that significantly impact criticality in nuclear technologies with the aim of improving the accuracy of the data and resolving previous discrepancies in our understanding.