Showing papers in "Nuclear Data Sheets in 2018"
••
Brookhaven National Laboratory1, Los Alamos National Laboratory2, International Atomic Energy Agency3, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute4, National Institute of Standards and Technology5, Oak Ridge National Laboratory6, Argonne National Laboratory7, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory8, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory9, North Carolina State University10, University of Michigan11, Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire12, TRIUMF13, Rosatom14, Chalk River Laboratories15, Paul Scherrer Institute16, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology17, University of Bucharest18, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research19
TL;DR: The new ENDF/B-VIII.0 evaluated nuclear reaction data library as mentioned in this paper includes improved thermal neutron scattering data and uses new evaluated data from the CIELO project for neutron reactions on 1 H, 16 O, 56 Fe, 235 U, 238 U and 239 Pu described in companion papers.
1,249 citations
••
National Institute of Standards and Technology1, Rosatom2, International Atomic Energy Agency3, Los Alamos National Laboratory4, Tsinghua University5, University of Santiago de Compostela6, Japan Atomic Energy Agency7, German National Metrology Institute8, Uppsala University9, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology10, Argonne National Laboratory11, Australian National University12, University of Vienna13
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a standard evaluation of the H(n,n), 6Li(n/t), 10B(n), α 1 γ ), natC(n+n), Au(nγ), 235U(n+,γ), 238U(m,γ), and 239Pu(m/n/n) cross sections.
154 citations
••
Vrije Universiteit Brussel1, International Atomic Energy Agency2, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica3, Los Alamos National Laboratory4, Australian National University5, Kyungpook National University6, Argonne National Laboratory7, Government College University8, Japan Atomic Energy Agency9, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre10, University of Surrey11
TL;DR: In this article, the IAEA-NDS medical portal www-nds.iaea.org/medical/monitor_reactions.html is used to compare beam monitor reaction data with their uncertainties.
152 citations
••
Los Alamos National Laboratory1, International Atomic Energy Agency2, National Nuclear Data Center3, Oak Ridge National Laboratory4, Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire5, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute6, National Institute of Standards and Technology7, Nuclear Energy Agency8, University of Santiago de Compostela9, Energy Institute10, Rosatom11, Japan Atomic Energy Agency12, Idaho National Laboratory13, Jožef Stefan Institute14, University of Michigan15, Chalk River Laboratories16, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory17, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology18, Nuclear Research and Consultancy Group19
TL;DR: The CIELO collaboration as discussed by the authors studied neutron cross sections on nuclides that significantly impact criticality in nuclear technologies with the aim of improving the accuracy of the data and resolving previous discrepancies in our understanding.
78 citations
••
National Nuclear Data Center1, International Atomic Energy Agency2, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute3, Energy Institute4, Oak Ridge National Laboratory5, Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire6, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica7, Los Alamos National Laboratory8, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology9
TL;DR: In this paper, a suite of evaluations for 54,56,57,58 Fe has been developed in the framework of the CIELO international collaboration, where new resolved resonance ranges were evaluated for 54 Fe and 57 Fe, while modifications were applied to resonances in 56 Fe.
59 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reported new prompt fission neutron spectrum measurements for 235U(n, f ) reactions induced by neutrons with energies from 0.7 to 20 MeV, using an array of 6Li-glass scintillators for neutron detection and a double time-of-flight technique.
38 citations
••
International Atomic Energy Agency1, University of Bucharest2, Oak Ridge National Laboratory3, Rosatom4, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute5, Jožef Stefan Institute6, National Nuclear Data Center7, Los Alamos National Laboratory8, Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire9, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research10
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors evaluated the performance of nuclear reaction data for the major uranium isotopes 238U and 235U in the CIELO Project on the initiative of the OECD/NEA Data Bank under Working Party on Evaluation Co-operation (WPEC) Subgroup 40 coordinated by the IAEA Nuclear Data Section.
36 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the experimental data from various reactions and decays have been evaluated for all known nuclides of mass 39 (Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, Ar, K, Ca, Sc, Ti).
25 citations
••
TL;DR: A.A. Sonzogni et al. as discussed by the authors evaluated all nuclei with mass number A=136 and the corresponding level schemes from radioactive decay and reaction studies are presented.
25 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the energy spectra of neutrons emitted in the neutron-induced fission reactions of 235 U and 239 Pu were re-evaluated for ENDF/B-VIII.0.
22 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a new level at 56845 keV (3/2−) has been added for 59Fe, which resolves a doublet at 570 keV, which was reflected in earlier evaluations (1983An22, 1993Ba85, 2002Ba42) and literature.
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the experimental data are compiled and evaluated, and best values for level and gamma-ray energies, quantum numbers, lifetimes, gamma ray intensities, and other nuclear properties are recommended.
••
TL;DR: In this article, all available experimental data of nuclear structure and decay for the known nuclides of mass 38 (Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, Ar, K, Ca, Sc, Ti) were evaluated with the best values recommended for level energies, half-lives, γ-ray energies and intensities, decay properties (energies, intensities and placement of radiations).
••
TL;DR: A broad picture of all ingredients treated by nuclear data evaluators during their analyses is given, with a focus on systematic uncertainties appearing in the analysis of differential measurements as well as advantages and drawbacks one may encounter by analyzing integral experiments.
••
Argonne National Laboratory1, Brookhaven National Laboratory2, McMaster University3, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics4, Visva-Bharati University5, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee6, University of Novi Sad7, University of Delhi8, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana9, Akal University10, University of Surrey11
TL;DR: The evaluated spectroscopic data are presented for 12 known nuclides with A=217 (Tl, Pb, Bi, Po, At, Rn, Fr, Ra, Ac, Th, Pa, U).
••
TL;DR: The 239Pu(n,γ) cross section has been measured from 10 eV to 1.3 MeV as part of an experimental campaign using the Detector for Advanced Neutron Capture Experiments (DANCE) as mentioned in this paper.