R
Richard M. Frankel
Researcher at Indiana University
Publications - 354
Citations - 27024
Richard M. Frankel is an academic researcher from Indiana University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Patient satisfaction. The author has an hindex of 74, co-authored 334 publications receiving 24885 citations. Previous affiliations of Richard M. Frankel include Wayne State University & Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Agenda setting in psychiatric consultations: an exploratory study.
Richard M. Frankel,Michelle P. Salyers,Kelsey A. Bonfils,Sylwia K. Oles,Marianne S. Matthias +4 more
TL;DR: Collaborative agenda setting represents a unique opportunity to translate the concept of consumer-centeredness into mental health care, and initial results suggest the rating system is reliable, but the essential elements are not being used in practice.
Journal ArticleDOI
Do Pennies Matter? Investor Relations Consequences of Small Negative Earnings Surprises
TL;DR: The authors found that firms that miss analyst expectations are about 5% less likely to offer future earnings guidance around the conference call and that the tone of the call is asymmetrically more negative for firms that just miss expectations.
Journal ArticleDOI
Connecting with healthcare providers at diagnosis: adolescent/young adult cancer survivors' perspectives.
TL;DR: The essential structure reveals that AYAs begin their experience of connectedness with a sense of disconnectedness prior to treatment, and the diagnosis is a period of confusion and emotional turmoil that interfere with the AyAs’ ability to connect.
Journal ArticleDOI
Challenges with delivering gender-specific and comprehensive primary care to women veterans.
Alicia A. Bergman,Richard M. Frankel,Richard M. Frankel,Alison B. Hamilton,Elizabeth M. Yano +4 more
TL;DR: The findings suggest that there may be barriers that undermine the ability of VA WH-PCPs to provide high-quality, comprehensive primary and gender-specific care, and may therefore require special policy and practice action.
Comparing obstetricians' and neonatologists' approaches to periviable counseling
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare the management options, risks and thematic content that obstetricians and neonatologists discuss in periviable counseling, and find that Obstetricians more frequently discussed antibiotics (P=0.005), maternal risks (<0.001) and cesarean risks (< 0.005).