Example of Conservation Letters format
Recent searches

Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format Example of Conservation Letters format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Conservation Letters — Template for authors

Publisher: Wiley
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Nature and Landscape Conservation #1 of 177 -
Ecology #5 of 400 up up by 1 rank
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics #9 of 647 up up by 5 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 126 Published Papers | 2232 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.7
SJR: 1.001
SNIP: 1.212
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.9
SJR: 1.214
SNIP: 1.356
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 9.7
SJR: 2.2
SNIP: 2.096
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

PLOS

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.3
SJR: 2.628
SNIP: 1.713

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

6.766

9% from 2018

Impact factor for Conservation Letters from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 6.766
2018 7.397
2017 7.279
2016 7.02
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

17.7

32% from 2019

CiteRatio for Conservation Letters from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 17.7
2019 13.4
2018 11.9
2017 13.6
2016 11.0
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 9% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 32% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.153

12% from 2019

SJR for Conservation Letters from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.153
2019 3.563
2018 3.227
2017 3.828
2016 3.064
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.776

5% from 2019

SNIP for Conservation Letters from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.776
2019 2.639
2018 2.457
2017 2.329
2016 1.852
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Conservation Letters

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Wiley

Conservation Letters

FREE ONLINE ACCESS TO ALL IN 2010! Conservation Letters is a rapid communications journal publishing urgent research with the most significant implications for conservation interventions. This vital publication aims to communicate the most novel biological and social science r...... Read More

Nature and Landscape Conservation

Ecology

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Environmental Science

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1755-263X
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.851
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
apa
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G.E., Tinkham, M., Klapwijk, T.M., 1982. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515–4532.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00158.X
“Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA
Christopher L. Jerde1, Andrew R. Mahon1, W. Lindsay Chadderton2, David M. Lodge1
01 Apr 2011 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

Effective management of rare species, including endangered native species and recently introduced nonindigenous species, requires the detection of populations at low density. For endangered species, detecting the localized distribution makes it possible to identify and protect critical habitat to enhance survival or reproduct... Effective management of rare species, including endangered native species and recently introduced nonindigenous species, requires the detection of populations at low density. For endangered species, detecting the localized distribution makes it possible to identify and protect critical habitat to enhance survival or reproductive success. Similarly, early detection of an incipient invasion by a harmful species increases the feasibility of rapid responses to eradicate the species or contain its spread. Here we demonstrate the efficacy of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a detection tool in freshwater environments. Specifically, we delimit the invasion fronts of two species of Asian carps in Chicago, Illinois, USA area canals and waterways. Quantitative comparisons with traditional fisheries surveillance tools illustrate the greater sensitivity of eDNA and reveal that the risk of invasion to the Laurentian Great Lakes is imminent. read more read less

Topics:

Critical habitat (58%)58% related to the paper, Introduced species (57%)57% related to the paper, Endangered species (57%)57% related to the paper, Conservation reliant species (56%)56% related to the paper, Rare species (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
965 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2008.00011.X
Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity
Lian Pin Koh1, David S. Wilcove1
01 Jun 2008 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

Oil palm is one of the world’s most rapidly expanding equatorial crops. The two largest oil palm-producing countries—Indonesia and Malaysia—are located in Southeast Asia, a region with numerous endemic, forest-dwelling species. Oil palm producers have asserted that forests are not being cleared to grow oil palm. Our analysis ... Oil palm is one of the world’s most rapidly expanding equatorial crops. The two largest oil palm-producing countries—Indonesia and Malaysia—are located in Southeast Asia, a region with numerous endemic, forest-dwelling species. Oil palm producers have asserted that forests are not being cleared to grow oil palm. Our analysis of land-cover data compiled by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization suggests that during the period 1990–2005, 55%–59% of oil palm expansion in Malaysia, and at least 56% of that in Indonesia occurred at the expense of forests. Using data on bird and butterfly diversity in Malaysia’s forests and croplands, we argue that conversion of either primary or secondary (logged) forests to oil palm may result in significant biodiversity losses, whereas conversion of pre-existing cropland (rubber) to oil palm results in fewer losses. To safeguard the biodiversity in oil palmproducing countries, more fine-scale and spatially explicit data on land-use change need to be collected and analyzed to determine the extent and nature of any further conversion of forests to oil palm; secondary forests should be protected against conversion to oil palm; and any future expansion of oil palm agriculture should be restricted to pre-existing cropland or degraded habitats. read more read less

Topics:

Deforestation (54%)54% related to the paper, Habitat destruction (51%)51% related to the paper, Biodiversity (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
854 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/CONL.12091
Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: a Synthesis of Critique and Counter-Arguments
01 Nov 2014 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

We describe and reflect on seven recurring critiques of the concept of ecosystem services and respective counter-arguments. First, the concept is criticized for being anthropocentric, whereas others argue that it goes beyond instrumental values. Second, some argue that the concept promotes an exploitative human-nature relatio... We describe and reflect on seven recurring critiques of the concept of ecosystem services and respective counter-arguments. First, the concept is criticized for being anthropocentric, whereas others argue that it goes beyond instrumental values. Second, some argue that the concept promotes an exploitative human-nature relationship, whereas others state that it reconnects society to ecosystems, emphasizing humanity's dependence on nature. Third, concerns exist that the concept may conflict with biodiversity conservation objectives, whereas others emphasize complementarity. Fourth, the concept is questioned because of its supposed focus on economic valuation, whereas others argue that ecosystem services science includes many values. Fifth, the concept is criticized for promoting commodification of nature, whereas others point out that most ecosystem services are not connected to market-based instruments. Sixth, vagueness of definitions and classifications are stated to be a weakness, whereas others argue that vagueness enhances transdisciplinary collaboration. Seventh, some criticize the normative nature of the concept, implying that all outcomes of ecosystem processes are desirable. The normative nature is indeed typical for the concept, but should not be problematic when acknowledged. By disentangling and contrasting different arguments we hope to contribute to a more structured debate between opponents and proponents of the ecosystem services concept. read more read less

Topics:

Ecosystem services (56%)56% related to the paper, Vagueness (53%)53% related to the paper, Commodification of nature (52%)52% related to the paper, Anthropocentrism (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
526 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2012.00242.X
Sustaining conservation values in selectively logged tropical forests: the attained and the attainable
01 Aug 2012 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

Most tropical forests outside protected areas have been or will be selectively logged so it is essential to maximize the conservation values of partially harvested areas. Here we examine the extent to which these forests sustain timber production, retain species, and conserve carbon stocks. We then describe some improvements ... Most tropical forests outside protected areas have been or will be selectively logged so it is essential to maximize the conservation values of partially harvested areas. Here we examine the extent to which these forests sustain timber production, retain species, and conserve carbon stocks. We then describe some improvements in tropical forestry and how their implementation can be promoted. A simple meta-analysis based on >100 publications revealed substantial variability but that: timber yields decline by about 46% after the first harvest but are subsequently sustained at that level; 76% of carbon is retained in once-logged forests; and, 85‐100% of species of mammals, birds, invertebrates, and plants remain after logging. Timber stocks will not regain primary-forest levels within current harvest cycles, but yields increase if collateral damage is reduced and silvicultural treatments are applied. Given that selectively logged forests retain substantial biodiversity, carbon, and timber stocks, this “middle way” between deforestation and total protection deserves more attention from researchers, conservation organizations, and policy-makers. Improvements in forest management are now likely if synergies are enhanced among initiatives to retain forest carbon stocks (REDD+), assure the legality of forest products, certify responsible management, and devolve control over forests to empowered local communities. read more read less

Topics:

Secondary forest (60%)60% related to the paper, Sustainable forest management (59%)59% related to the paper, Forest management (58%)58% related to the paper, Deforestation (56%)56% related to the paper, Logging (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
508 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00097.X
Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change.
Michael R. Kearney1, Brendan A. Wintle1, Warren P. Porter2
01 Jun 2010 - Conservation Letters

Abstract:

Good forecasts of climate change impacts on extinction risks are critical for effective conservation management responses. Species distribution models (SDMs) are central to extinction risk analyses. The reliability of predictions of SDMs has been questioned because models often lack a mechanistic underpinning and rely on assu... Good forecasts of climate change impacts on extinction risks are critical for effective conservation management responses. Species distribution models (SDMs) are central to extinction risk analyses. The reliability of predictions of SDMs has been questioned because models often lack a mechanistic underpinning and rely on assumptions that are untenable under climate change. We show how integrating predictions from fundamentally different modeling strategies produces robust forecasts of climate change impacts on habitat and population parameters. We illustrate the principle by applying mechanistic (Niche Mapper) and correlative (Maxent, Bioclim) SDMs to predict current and future distributions and fertility of an Australian gliding possum. The two approaches make congruent, accurate predictions of current distribution and similar, dire predictions about the impact of a warming scenario, supporting previous correlative-only predictions for similar species. We argue that convergent lines of independent evidence provide a robust basis for predicting and managing extinctions risks under climate change. read more read less

Topics:

Climate change (52%)52% related to the paper, Population (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
439 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Conservation Letters.

It automatically formats your research paper to Wiley formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Conservation Letters format uses apa citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Conservation Letters in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Conservation Letters guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Conservation Letters guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Conservation Letters guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Conservation Letters?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Conservation Letters citation style.

4. Can I use the Conservation Letters templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Conservation Letters.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Conservation Letters that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Conservation Letters that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Conservation Letters?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Conservation Letters.

7. Where can I find the template for the Conservation Letters?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Conservation Letters's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Conservation Letters's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Conservation Letters an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Conservation Letters is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Conservation Letters?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Conservation Letters?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Conservation Letters?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Conservation Letters, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Conservation Letters's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Conservation Letters?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Conservation Letters. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Conservation Letters?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Conservation Letters are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Conservation Letters?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Conservation Letters's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Conservation Letters in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Conservation Letters Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Conservation Letters formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template