scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Georgetown University Law Center

About: Georgetown University Law Center is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Supreme court & Public health. The organization has 585 authors who have published 2488 publications receiving 36650 citations. The organization is also known as: Georgetown Law & GULC.


Papers
More filters
Posted Content
TL;DR: Balkin this paper argued that the original meaning of the word "commerce" was not social interaction, but commerce referred to the trade or transportation of things or persons, and did not include such productive economic activity as manufacturing or agriculture.
Abstract: In his book, Living Originalism, Jack Balkin proposes what he calls the “interaction theory” of the original semantic meaning of the word “commerce” in the Commerce Clause. He claims that “commerce” meant “social interaction.” In this article I show why this theory is wrong due to errors of commission and omission. Balkin is wrong to reduce “commerce” to “intercourse,” “intercourse” to “interaction,” and “interaction” to “affecting.” This triple reduction distorts rather than illuminates the original meaning of “commerce.” And Balkin omits from his discussion the massive amounts of evidence of contemporary usage—along with dictionary definitions of “intercourse”—establishing that “commerce” referred to the trade or transportation of things or persons, and did not include such productive economic activity as manufacturing or agriculture, much less all social interaction. In this article, I also reply to Balkin’s criticisms of my book, Restoring the Lost Constitution. I show how his heavy reliance on Gunning Bedford’s resolution in the secret Philadelphia convention is misplaced in a discussion of the original meaning of the Commerce Clause.

1 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that certain common misperceptions about congressional ethics enforcement (misperceptions advanced most recently in Paul M. Thompson's response to my Comment calling for the creation of Congressional Commissioners for Standards) result from a confusion of the purposes of congressional ethics with those of the criminal law.
Abstract: This brief piece argues that certain common misperceptions about congressional ethics enforcement (misperceptions advanced most recently in Paul M. Thompson's response to my Comment calling for the creation of Congressional Commissioners for Standards) result from a confusion of the purposes of congressional ethics with those of the criminal law. Congressional ethics is not simply about punishing rulebreakers; rather, it aims to promote clean government and public trust in Congress and its members. This understanding of the proper purpose of congressional ethics allows us to see more clearly both what is wrong with the current system and how certain reforms would provide useful correctives.

1 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Biden will try to navigate a Congress narrowly controlled by Democrats while acting administratively as well as discussed by the authors, but will face a difficult task navigating a Congress that is controlled by Republicans.
Abstract: President Joe Biden will try to navigate a Congress narrowly controlled by Democrats while acting administratively as well

1 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: The other trade war is not the tit-for-tat tariffs but rather the clash over the expansion of judicial lawmaking at the World Trade Organization and its Appellate Body as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: This Essay takes up the “other trade war” – not the tit-for-tat tariffs but rather the clash over the expansion of judicial lawmaking at the World Trade Organization and its Appellate Body. In Part I of this Essay, I outline the positions of critics of the WTO dispute settlement system and situate those views in the context of a broader conversation on issues with international trade law. Part II argues for rethinking and disaggregating. While some commentators view the other trade war monoptically as a general crisis precipitated by power politics, I introduce four different crises or conflicts that I believe frame the debate. This Essay’s approach challenges the popular perspective on how the present critical juncture developed and instead emphasizes the weight of divisions in legal ideology. Part III situates my proposed frame in the larger context of international dispute settlement design and delegation. The Essay concludes that the international dispute settlement “forest” should be the focus of our sustained work, rather than the trade law “trees”.

1 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: Benko and Rohrs as mentioned in this paper present an overview of the interim guidance issued by Treasury and the IRS on the new section 199 domestic production deduction, which is used in Section 199.
Abstract: Beth M. Benko and Jane A. Rohrs present an overview of the interim guidance issued by Treasury and the IRS on the new section 199 domestic production deduction.

1 citations


Authors

Showing all 585 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Lawrence O. Gostin7587923066
Michael J. Saks381555398
Chirag Shah343415056
Sara J. Rosenbaum344256907
Mark Dybul33614171
Steven C. Salop3312011330
Joost Pauwelyn321543429
Mark Tushnet312674754
Gorik Ooms291243013
Alicia Ely Yamin291222703
Julie E. Cohen28632666
James G. Hodge272252874
John H. Jackson271022919
Margaret M. Blair26754711
William W. Bratton251122037
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
American University
13K papers, 367.2K citations

78% related

Brookings Institution
2.7K papers, 135.3K citations

78% related

London School of Economics and Political Science
35K papers, 1.4M citations

78% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

75% related

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
1.9K papers, 118K citations

75% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202174
2020146
2019115
2018113
2017109
2016118