Institution
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Education•Poznań, Poland•
About: Poznan University of Medical Sciences is a education organization based out in Poznań, Poland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 5021 authors who have published 10098 publications receiving 145607 citations.
Topics: Population, Medicine, Cancer, Diabetes mellitus, Pregnancy
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: A study of a large number of adolescents showed a prevalence of orthorexia nervosa similar to that recorded in adult populations, but it is not clear whether ON should be treated as a new form of ED.
Abstract: Objective: Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is considered an eating disorder (ED), with an excessive fixation on the consumption of healthy food and an obsession with its biological purity. Since the adolescent period poses a risk for EDs, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of ON in a population of Polish urban adolescents and some possible contributory factors.Method: 1899 high school students, 992 girls and 907 boys aged 15–21 years were studied. Demographic and clinical data were collected using a validated questionnaire including information on preferred living choices, in the context of pro- and antihealth activities. The Polish version of the ORTO-15 questionnaire was used.Results: The mean value of the ORTO-15 was 39.2 ± 3.6 points, with no sex difference. The main factors connected with orthorexia, according to the ‘Orthorexia 33.35 and 40’ definitions were excess weight, sporting activities, out-of-school activities, smoking status, working parents and a high family income.Conclusi...
49 citations
••
TL;DR: Simulated matching probabilities by donor file size suggest that there is a need for intense donor recruitment efforts in Poland despite the large German donor registry and the genetic relatedness of both populations.
49 citations
••
TL;DR: It is speculated that IL-15 may serve as a target for future treatment in patients with prediabetes and/or for prevention of late diabetic complications and the potential associations betweenIL-15 serum level and long-term diabetic control are speculated.
49 citations
••
Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli1, Semmelweis University2, Region Zealand3, University of Caen Lower Normandy4, University of Copenhagen5, University of Zurich6, Charles University in Prague7, University of Geneva8, Oslo University Hospital9, Poznan University of Medical Sciences10, Medical University of Vienna11, Istanbul University12
TL;DR: The study demonstrated that BNSS has substantial advantages with respect to PANSS for the identification of the avolition domain and subjects with predominant negative symptoms, and showed an excellent internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity of BnSS.
49 citations
••
TL;DR: The tolerability of initiating sacubitril/valsartan following ADHF in TRANSITION subgroups of patients with a de novo vs. prior diagnosis of HFrEF is assessed.
Abstract: AIMS Sacubitril/valsartan has shown efficacy and tolerability in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in the ambulatory setting (PARADIGM-HF), and following stabilisation of acutely decompensated HF (ADHF) (PIONEER-HF and TRANSITION). However, data are lacking for the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in newly diagnosed (de novo) HFrEF. Here, we assess the tolerability of initiating sacubitril/valsartan following ADHF in TRANSITION subgroups of patients with a de novo vs. prior diagnosis of HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS TRANSITION randomised 1002 patients to pre- and post-discharge initiation of sacubitril/valsartan (analysis set n = 991, following exclusions for mis-randomisation). In this post-hoc analysis, tolerability to sacubitril/valsartan [proportion of patients achieving target dose (97/103 mg b.i.d.) at 10 weeks post-randomisation], adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were compared in de novo (n = 286) and prior HFrEF (n = 705) subgroups. More de novo than prior HFrEF patients achieved target dose at Week 10 (56% vs. 45%; relative risk ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.52, P < 0.001), and fewer had SAEs and permanent treatment discontinuations. Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan did not prevent the concomitant initiation and up-titration of guideline-directed HF therapies. De novo patients showed faster and greater decreases in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin-T, and lower rates of HF and all-cause rehospitalisation vs. prior HFrEF. CONCLUSIONS After ADHF, first-line initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in de novo HFrEF, alongside the initiation of other guideline-directed therapies, is feasible and is associated with a better risk-benefit profile than in patients with prior HFrEF. Early intervention with sacubitril/valsartan may be considered to delay disease progression in patients with de novo HFrEF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02661217.
49 citations
Authors
Showing all 5055 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Thorkild I. A. Sørensen | 114 | 747 | 60060 |
Ingrid E. Scheffer | 113 | 585 | 53463 |
Kim A. Papp | 82 | 361 | 28368 |
Carle Paul | 72 | 437 | 21426 |
Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi | 69 | 372 | 29268 |
George R. Blumenschein | 64 | 358 | 21605 |
Janusz K. Rybakowski | 59 | 485 | 14097 |
Marie-Claude Morice | 58 | 279 | 22264 |
Joerg Lahann | 56 | 262 | 13872 |
Roman Kaliszan | 54 | 282 | 9089 |
Karl-Heinz Herzig | 54 | 321 | 12623 |
Matti Uusitupa | 54 | 123 | 34387 |
Joanna Hauser | 53 | 196 | 9860 |
Maria Siemionow | 47 | 350 | 8055 |
Sakari Reitamo | 46 | 148 | 7381 |