Showing papers in "Security Studies in 1996"
TL;DR: In this paper, Neorealism's status-quo bias: What security dilemma? Security Studies: Vol 5, No. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 90-121.
Abstract: (1996). Neorealism's status‐quo bias: What security dilemma? Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 90-121.
317 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, international politics is not foreign policy, but rather domestic politics is, and the focus is on the domestic polarity of the polarity, rather than foreign policy.
Abstract: (1996). International politics is not foreign policy. Security Studies: Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 54-57.
258 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss why nor neorealist theories of foreign policy do not explain the need for horses for courses in foreign policy, and propose a horse-for-course approach.
Abstract: (1996). Horses for courses: Why nor neorealist theories of foreign policy? Security Studies: Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 7-53.
226 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, a neorealist interpretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European economic and monetary union is presented, with a focus on state interests and institutional rule trajectories.
Abstract: (1996). State interests and institutional rule trajectories: A neorealist interpretation of the Maastricht treaty and European economic and monetary union. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 261-306.
162 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, Realists as optimists: Cooperation as self-help is presented. But this paper is based on the Realism: Restatements and Renewal (RWR) framework.
Abstract: (1996). Realists as optimists: Cooperation as self‐help. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 122-163.
129 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that no one loves a political realist, and that realism is not a good fit for the realist movement, and they propose Restatements and Renewal.
Abstract: (1996). No one loves a political realist. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 3-26.
108 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, intervention in ethnic and ideological civil wars: Why one can be done and the other can't Security Studies: Vol 6, No 1, pp 62-101.
Abstract: (1996) Intervention in ethnic and ideological civil wars: Why one can be done and the other can't Security Studies: Vol 6, No 1, pp 62-101
94 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose Restating the realist case: An introduction. But they do not discuss the realism case in the context of security studies, instead they focus on Restatements and Renewal.
Abstract: (1996). Restating the realist case: An introduction. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 9-20.
87 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, commercial liberalism under fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936, the authors present a collection of essays from 1914 to 1936 on commercial liberalism in the US, focusing on the following issues:
Abstract: (1996). Commercial liberalism under fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936. Security Studies: Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 4-50.
78 citations
TL;DR: Using economic sanctions to control regional conflicts as mentioned in this paper has been used to control conflicts in the Middle East since the early nineties, and has been shown to work well in several countries.
Abstract: (1996). Using economic sanctions to control regional conflicts. Security Studies: Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 43-72.
65 citations
TL;DR: In this article, Anarchy and the emulation of military systems: Military organization and technology in South America, 1870-1930, were discussed. But they did not consider the role of women in these systems.
Abstract: (1996). Anarchy and the emulation of military systems: Military organization and technology in South America, 1870–1930. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 193-260.
TL;DR: In this article, process variables in neorealist theory are discussed. But they focus on process variables rather than process variables themselves, and do not consider process variables as process variables.
Abstract: (1996). Process variables in neorealist theory. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 167-192.
TL;DR: In this article, American foreign policy and the fungibility of force are discussed. But the focus is not on the use of force, but on the application of force in the field of security studies.
Abstract: (1996). American foreign policy and the fungibility of force. Security Studies: Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 7-42.
TL;DR: The U.S. military is averse to responding to post-cold war low-level threats as mentioned in this paper, and the reluctance of the military to respond to low level threats has been identified as a major reason for its reluctance to defend itself.
Abstract: (1996). Are the reluctant warriors out of control? Why the U.S. military is averse to responding to post‐cold war low‐level threats. Security Studies: Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 51-90.
TL;DR: In this paper, a house divided: Tragedy and evil in realist theory is discussed, with a focus on the House of House Divided Realism, a realist framework.
Abstract: (1996). A house divided: Tragedy and evil in realist theory. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 385-423.
TL;DR: In this paper, a new dynamic realist theory of major war is proposed, based on Neorealism and the myth of bipolar stability, with a focus on the role of nonlinearity.
Abstract: (1996). Neorealism and the myth of bipolar stability: Toward a new dynamic realist theory of major war. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 29-89.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss why realists disagree about the Third World (and why they shouldn't) and why they should be concerned about the third world and why realism should be renewed.
Abstract: (1996). Why realists disagree about the Third World (and why they shouldn't) Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 358-381.
TL;DR: The genesis of the gulf cooperation council is discussed in this paper, where the balance-of-threat theory and the genesis of gulf cooperation are discussed in an interpretative case study.
Abstract: (1996). Balance‐of‐threat theory and the genesis of the gulf cooperation council: An interpretative case study. Security Studies: Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 143-171.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present realist perspectives on great power crisis behavior and compare them with the realist perspective on the realism of the crisis behavior of the United States.
Abstract: (1996). Competing realist perspectives on great power crisis behavior. Security Studies: Vol. 5, Realism: Restatements and Renewal, pp. 309-357.
TL;DR: The politics of resource allocation in the post-cold war pentagon was discussed in this paper, where the authors focused on the allocation of resources to the most important tasks in the military.
Abstract: (1996). The politics of resource allocation in the post‐cold war pentagon. Security Studies: Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 125-142.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an account of strategic choice in the 1890s and discuss the differences between interest-based vs. cultural-cognitive accounts of strategic choices in the 1990s.
Abstract: (1996). Sea Change: Interest‐based vs. cultural‐cognitive account of strategic choice in the 1890s. Security Studies: Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 73-124.
TL;DR: McNamara, In Retrospect; The Tragedy and lessons of Vietnam as discussed by the authors, vol. xviii, 414 pp/$27.50 cloth, New York: Random House, 1995.
Abstract: Robert S. McNamara, In Retrospect; The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam. New York: Random House, 1995. xviii, 414 pp./$27.50 cloth.
TL;DR: Goldstein and Keohane as mentioned in this paper discuss belief, institutions, and political change in the context of belief systems, beliefs, and institutions, in a paper entitled "Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change".
Abstract: Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, eds. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell Unviersity Press, 1993. 308 pp./$14.95 paper. Peter Katzenstein, ed. Culture and Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. 560 pp./$49.50 doth; $17.50 paper.