A capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer probe for assessment of cortical bone
read more
Citations
A cMUT probe for ultrasound-guided focused ultrasound targeted therapy
Analysis of fringing capacitance effect on the performance of micro-electromechanical-system-based micromachined ultrasonic air transducer
Broad bandwidth air-coupled micromachined ultrasonic transducers for gas sensing.
Performance Evaluation of CMUT-Based Ultrasonic Transformers for Galvanic Isolation
References
Surface micromachined capacitive ultrasonic transducers
Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: next-generation arrays for acoustic imaging?
A surface micromachined electrostatic ultrasonic air transducer
Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: fabrication technology
Calculation and measurement of electromechanical coupling coefficient of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q2. What was the first step used to determine the directivity pattern of one element?
In the first step, a wideband pulse was used to compare the measured central frequency and bandwidth with theoretical values and to determine the directivity pattern.
Q3. Why did the amplitude of the RF signals decrease with distance?
Due to the bone attenuation, the amplitude of the RF signals decreased rapidly with distance, and data collected at 1.5 MHz were much lower in amplitude than at 500 kHz.
Q4. How many guided modes can be seen in cortical bone?
Within the usable frequency range for bone characterization (i.e. 100 kHz - 2 MHz) it can be seen that the angular spectrum was wide enough (here 50°) to generate a large number of guided modes in cortical bone.
Q5. How was the electromechanical coupling coefficient measured?
For each element, the maximum value of the electromechanical coupling coefficient measured was 0.7, at a biasing voltage close to the collapse voltage.
Q6. How did the central frequency of the cMUT chip decrease?
Above 35 µm, the central frequency showed very small decreases and stagnated at values close to 4 MHz, while the deflection continued to increase strongly to reach 100 nm.
Q7. How did the PZT probe perform at a frequency of 1.5 MHz?
The maximum directivity was obtained at 750 kHz at an angle of 50°, while the directivity at -15dB fell to 20° at a frequency of 1.5 MHz.
Q8. Why was the A1 mode detected only with the cMUT probe?
Above f = 1.2 MHz and above k = 3.5 rad.mm -1, the A1 mode was detected only with the cMUT probe due to difference in directivity.
Q9. Why were the inter-cell distances designed with high values?
For this first prototype, the inter-cell distances were intentionally designed with high values to avoid any risk of alignment errors.
Q10. What is the cMUT probe's angular spectrum?
The cMUT probe was in contact with the silicone block and the transmitted pulse between one emitter and one receiver was measured.
Q11. Why was the hydrophone used in this study?
This method was chosen because hydrophones are rarely calibrated for large bandwidth operations, meaning that for this study several hydrophones should have been used to measure the output pressure from 500 kHz to 10 MHz.
Q12. What is the acoustic pulse used to measure the acoustic waves?
Using a transducer in contact with the skin (Fig. 1), one acoustic pulse is emitted towards the cortical bone and then collected throughout its propagation using a set of transducers regularly spaced along the bone.
Q13. What was the acoustic response of the PZT probe?
At angle=0°, these modes were the combination of three thickness resonances in each layer of the sandwich made with the PZT plate coupled to the matching layers.