scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A wireless structural health monitoring system with multithreaded sensing devices: design and validation

TLDR
A newly designed integrated wireless monitoring system that supports real-time data acquisition from multiple wireless sensing units that has been fabricated, assembled, and validated in both laboratory tests and in a large-scale field test conducted upon the Geumdang Bridge in Icheon, South Korea.
Abstract
Structural health monitoring (SHM) has become an important research problem which has the potential to monitor and ensure the performance and safety of civil structures. Traditional wire-based SHM systems require significant time and cost for cable installation. With the recent advances in wireless communication technology, wireless SHM systems have emerged as a promising alternative solution for rapid, accurate and low-cost structural monitoring. This paper presents a newly designed integrated wireless monitoring system that supports real-time data acquisition from multiple wireless sensing units. The selected wireless transceiver consumes relatively low power and supports long-distance peer-to-peer communication. In addition to hardware, embedded multithreaded software is also designed as an integral component of the proposed wireless monitoring system. A direct result of the multithreaded software paradigm is a wireless sensing unit capable of simultaneous data collection, data interrogation and wirele...

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

A Wireless Structural Health Monitoring System with Multithreaded
Sensing Devices: Design and Validation
Yang Wang
a
, Jerome P. Lynch
b
, Kincho H. Law *
a
a
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
b
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
* Correspondence Author:
Kincho H. Law
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4020
USA
Email: law@stanford.edu
Tel: 1-650-725-3154
Fax: 1-650-725-9755

1
ABSTRACT
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) has become an important research problem which has the potential to
monitor and ensure the performance and safety of civil structures. Traditional wire-based SHM systems
require significant time and cost for cable installation. With the recent advances in wireless communication
technology, wireless SHM systems have emerged as a promising alternative solution for rapid, accurate and
low-cost structural monitoring. This paper presents a newly designed integrated wireless monitoring system
that supports real-time data acquisition from multiple wireless sensing units. The selected wireless
transceiver consumes relatively low power and supports long-distance peer-to-peer communication. In
addition to hardware, embedded multithreaded software is also designed as an integral component of the
proposed wireless monitoring system. A direct result of the multithreaded software paradigm is a wireless
sensing unit capable of simultaneous data collection, data interrogation and wireless transmission. A reliable
data communication protocol is designed and implemented, enabling robust real-time and near-synchronized
data acquisition from multiple wireless sensing units. An integrated prototype system has been fabricated,
assembled, and validated in both laboratory tests and a large-scale field test conducted upon the Geumdang
Bridge in Icheon, South Korea.
Keywords: Structural monitoring, wireless sensing, sensor networks, data acquisition, on-board data
processing, vibration tests.
1. INTRODUCTION
The safety and reliability of civil infrastructure systems are essential for supporting the economic vitality of
our society. As civil structures are continuously subjected to loads and other environmental effects, the
structural condition of many civil infrastructures in the U.S. is deteriorating. For example, more than half of

2
the bridges in the United States were built before 1940’s, and nearly 42% of them were reported to be
structurally deficient and below established safety standards (Stallings et al., 2000). To protect the public
from unsafe bridge structures, current U.S. federal requirements necessitate local transportation authorities to
visually inspect the entire inventory of well over 580,000 highway bridges biannually (Chase, 2001). An
inherent drawback of visual inspections is that they only consider damage that is visible on the surface of the
structure; damage located below the surface often remains elusive to the inspectors. Furthermore, bridge
inspections can be highly subjective. For example, a recent study by the U.S. Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) quantified the reliability of visual inspections with wide variability discovered in
the condition ratings assigned by trained inspectors to a bridge intentionally damaged as part of the study
(Moore et al., 2001). With visual inspections both costly and labor intensive, low cost sensing systems that
can quantitatively assess the integrity and remaining life of a structure are needed (Liu et al., 2003).
As a complimentary approach and promising alternative to visual structural inspections, structural health
monitoring (SHM) systems have been proposed to predict, identify, and locate the onset of structural damage
(Sohn et al. 2001, Chang et al. 2003, Elgamal et al. 2003). SHM systems employ smart sensor technologies
to assist in identifying subtle structural abnormality based on measured structural response parameters
(Farrar et al. 2003, Spencer et al. 2004). Various types of structural sensors, including accelerometers,
displacement transducers, strain gages, and thermometers, can be deployed to provide valuable real-time
information about the behavior of a structure or environmental conditions. A necessary element of a SHM
system is the data acquisition (DAQ) system used to collect sensor measurements and to store the data in a
centralized location. Current commercial DAQ systems designed for permanent installation or for short-term
vibration tests employ cables to directly transmit sensor data to the central data repository. By running
cables between sensors and the data server, traditional DAQ systems suffer from high installation costs in
terms of both time and money. Installing extensive lengths of cables can consume over 75% of the total
SHM system installation time (Straser and Kiremidjian, 1998). In the U.S., the cost of installing a typical

3
structural monitoring system in buildings can exceed a few thousand dollars per sensing channel (Celebi,
2002).
Recent developments in the fields of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and wireless communications
have introduced new opportunities to reduce the installation costs of structural monitoring systems (Min et
al. 2001, Warneke et al. 2002, Lynch et al. 2004b). MEMS technology has led to the development of
sensors that are low cost, low power, compact, and easy to install; while wireless technology allows for
transmitting sensor measurements without the need for cables. The use of wireless communications as a
means for eradicating cables within a structural monitoring system was illustrated by Straser and Kiremidjian
(1998). Their work demonstrated both the feasibility and the cost-effectiveness of wireless SHM systems.
With respect to the architectural design of wireless SHM systems, Kottapalli et al. (2003) proposed a two-
tiered wireless sensor network topology that especially addresses the power consumption, data rate, and
communication range limitations of current wireless monitoring systems. Lynch et al. (2004a) explored
further the concept of embedding damage identification algorithms directly into wireless sensing units,
harnessing the computational resources of these devices to execute data interrogation algorithms. The
embedment of engineering algorithms within the wireless sensing units serves as a means of reducing power-
consuming wireless communications, and thereby largely improves the scalability of the system. Many other
research efforts in developing wireless sensing platforms for structural health monitoring have been reported
(Hill 2003, Kling 2003, Arms et al. 2004, Callaway 2004, Culler et al. 2004, Glaser 2004, Mastroleon et al.
2004, Ou et al. 2004, Shinozuka et al. 2004, Spencer et al. 2004).
Compared to traditional wire-based systems, wireless structural monitoring systems have a unique set of
technical challenges (Wang et al., 2005b). First, wireless sensing units will most likely employ batteries that
have a limited supply of energy for the near future. Batteries are probable in the short-term because current
power harvesting techniques cannot yet provide a reliable, convenient, and low-cost solution for powering
typical wireless structural sensors (Churchill et al. 2003, Roundy 2003, Sodano et al. 2004). In terms of

4
power consumption, wireless transceivers often consume the greatest amount of energy than any of the other
components in the wireless sensor design (Lynch et al., 2004a). Local data processing targeted to balance
data transmission and energy consumption is desirable. Second, the transmission of data in a wireless
network is inherently less reliable than in cable-based networks; reliability decreases as the communication
range becomes farther. Third, the limited amount of wireless bandwidth usually impedes high-speed real-
time data collection from multiple sensors. Fourth, time delays encountered during data transmission
between different wireless sensing units due to sensor blockage or clock imprecision needs to be thoroughly
considered (Lei et al., 2003).
The wireless structural monitoring system proposed in this paper attempts to address some of the technical
challenges described above. The design of this new system was especially oriented for large-scale and low-
power wireless SHM applications in civil structures (Wang et al., 2005a). Some of the main features of this
new wireless SHM system are: 1) low power consumption while achieving long communication ranges with
robust communication protocols for reliable data acquisition, 2) accurate synchronized wireless data
collection from multiple analog sensors at a reasonable sampling rate suitable for civil structural applications,
3) high-precision analog-to-digital conversion, 4) considerable local data processing capability at the wireless
sensing units to reduce energy consumption and to enhance system scalability, and 5) accommodation of
peer-to-peer communication among wireless sensing units for collaborative decentralized data analysis. An
integrated wireless SHM system has been developed, fabricated and assembled. Furthermore, the SHM
system has undergone laboratory and large-scale field tests to validate the system performance within the
complex environment posed by civil structures. The field tests were conducted at Geumdang Bridge in
Icheon, South Korea by simultaneously employing 14 wireless sensing units on the bridge for continuous
real-time data acquisition using a single data server (Lynch et al., 2005).
This paper presents in detail the hardware organization of this new wireless SHM system. Major circuit
components of the wireless sensing units are introduced, with key hardware performance features of the

Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network

TL;DR: An approach to time rectification of the acquired signals that can recover accurate timing despite failures of the underlying time synchronization protocol is described.
Journal ArticleDOI

An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures

TL;DR: To improve the ability of low-cost wireless sensing units to detect the onset of structural damage, the wireless sensing unit paradigm is extended to include the capability to command actuators and active sensors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Technology innovation in developing the structural health monitoring system for Guangzhou New TV Tower

TL;DR: In this paper, a structural health monitoring (SHM) system consisting of over 600 sensors has been designed and is being implemented by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University to GNTVT for both in-construction and in-service real-time monitoring.
Journal ArticleDOI

Structural Health Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Survey

TL;DR: A comprehensive survey of SHM using WSNs is presented outlining the algorithms used in damage detection and localization, outlining network design challenges, and future research directions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Performance monitoring of the Geumdang Bridge using a dense network of high-resolution wireless sensors

TL;DR: In this paper, a network of low-cost wireless sensors was installed in the Geumdang Bridge, Korea to monitor the bridge response to truck loading, and a signal conditioning circuit that amplifies and filters low-level accelerometer outputs is proposed.
References
More filters
Book

System Identification: Theory for the User

Lennart Ljung
TL;DR: Das Buch behandelt die Systemidentifizierung in dem theoretischen Bereich, der direkte Auswirkungen auf Verstaendnis and praktische Anwendung der verschiedenen Verfahren zur IdentifIZierung hat.
Book

Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing

TL;DR: Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing as discussed by the authors is a complete text and reference book on scientific computing with over 100 new routines (now well over 300 in all), plus upgraded versions of many of the original routines, with many new topics presented at the same accessible level.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (19)
Q1. What are the features of the prototype wireless monitoring system?

Special features of the prototype wireless monitoring system includes: 1) low power consumption without sacrificing long-range communication, 2) rapid system installation and low system costs, 3) reliable communication protocols ensuring lossless wireless communications, 4) a multithreaded embedded software allowing for simultaneous data sampling and wireless communications, 5) high-precision time synchronization, and 6) local data processing capabilities integrated with the wireless sensing units. 

With respect to the wireless sensing unit hardware design, sensor signal conditioning and anti-noise filters can be designed to improve the measurement fidelity of the wireless sensing units. 

Due to the system complexity needed to ensure the reliability of the wireless communication channel, the state machine concept (Tweed, 1994) is employed for the software architecture for both the wireless sensing units and the central server. 

Using the currently selected microcontroller and SRAM, a 4,096- point floating-point Cooley-Turkey FFT method takes about 18 seconds to complete. 

With over 128kB of space available in memory, the wireless sensing unit can effectively store up to 64,000 data points (at 16-bit resolution). 

Upon demand from the central server, the wireless sensing units can be commanded to collect sensor data and perform a floating-point FFT on the sampled data. 

The visible parts include the battery pack, the weatherproof container, the 9XCite wireless transceiver that is mounted on the PCB board, and the antenna of the wireless transceiver. 

Because each wireless sensing unit is listening for the single central server beacon signal, time synchronization across the entire wireless sensor network is represented by uncoupled unit-server pairs. 

Using the measured ground acceleration as input, the numerical simulation model is again executed to compute the theoretical response of the three floors by employing the average acceleration time integration method. 

The only limitation encountered in this mode of operation is the available on-board memory which would control the duration of time the wireless sensor can collect data before exceeding its memory capacity. 

The three natural frequencies extracted from the three peaks of the DFT plot are 2.07Hz, 5.73Hz, and 8.27Hz, while the three theoretical natural frequencies computed from the simulation model are 2.08Hz, 5.71Hz, and 8.18Hz, respectively. 

A unique feature of the embedded wireless sensing unit software is that it can continue collecting data from interfaced sensors in real-time as the wireless sensing unit is transmitting data to the central server. 

Different decentralized damage detection and system identification algorithms that are suitable for embedment in the computational core of the wireless sensing units can be tested. 

it should be noted that although the system synchronization error is around 20µs at the beginningof the data collection, the synchronization error might increase after long periods of time because of a naturaltime drift in the crystal clocks integrated with each wireless sensing unit. 

While the interior of the box girder protects the wireless sensing units from the natural elements, there are a number of vertical stiffener diaphragms within the box girder that attenuate the wireless signal between the wireless sensing units. 

This wireless transceiver offers the trade-off and balance between low power consumption and long communication distance for applications in structural health monitoring. 

As discussed earlier, some of the key issues considered in the hardware design of the wireless sensing units include limited power consumption, long peer-to-peer communication range, and local data processing capability. 

The digitized sensor data is then transferred to the computational core through a high-speed Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) port. 

Although not presented here, the development of other facets of the communication protocol have demonstrated that the state machine concept provides the convenience for both designing and implementing program flow between the data server and the wireless sensing units.