scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary?

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
An instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research is described and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality is described.
About
This article is published in Controlled Clinical Trials.The article was published on 1996-02-01. It has received 15740 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Blinding & Jadad scale.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Does Locoregional Radiation Therapy Improve Survival in Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: Locoregional radiation after surgery in patients treated with systemic therapy reduced mortality and several questions remain on how these results should be translated into current-day clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of Resistance Training on Blood Pressure and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

TL;DR: A meta-analysis supports the blood pressure–lowering potential of dynamic resistance training and isometric handgrip training and also favorably affects some other cardiovascular risk factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds

TL;DR: In this paper, the benefits and harms of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for treating chronic ulcers of the lower limb (diabetic foot ulcers, venous and arterial ulcers and pressure ulcers) were assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ketamine as adjuvant analgesic to opioids: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review.

TL;DR: It is concluded that small dose ketamine is a safe and useful adjuvant to standard practice opioid-analgesia.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present guidelines for choosing among six different forms of the intraclass correlation for reliability studies in which n target are rated by k judges, and the confidence intervals for each of the forms are reviewed.
Book

Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose three basic concepts: devising the items, selecting the items and selecting the responses, from items to scales, reliability and validity of the responses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

TL;DR: Empirical evidence is provided that inadequate methodological approaches in controlled trials, particularly those representing poor allocation concealment, are associated with bias.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.

TL;DR: The characteristics of several major methods (Delphi, Nominal Group, and models developed by the National Institutes of Health and Glaser) are surveyed and guidelines for those who want to use the techniques are provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.

TL;DR: A reasonable standard design and conduct of trials will facilitate the interpretation of those with conflicting results and help in making valid combinations of undersized trials.
Related Papers (5)