scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary?

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
An instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research is described and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality is described.
About
This article is published in Controlled Clinical Trials.The article was published on 1996-02-01. It has received 15740 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Blinding & Jadad scale.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Probiotics in the treatment and prevention of acute infectious diarrhea in infants and children: a systematic review of published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

TL;DR: Evidence of a clinically significant benefit of probiotics in the treatment of acute infectious diarrhea in infants and children, particularly in rotaviral gastroenteritis is found, although other probiotic strains may also be effective.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevention of pain on injection with propofol: a quantitative systematic review.

TL;DR: In conclusion, IV lidocaine (0.5 mg/kg) should be given with a rubber tourniquet on the forearm, 30 to 120 s before the injection of propofol, and will prevent pain in approximately 60% of the patients treated in this manner.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery

TL;DR: Adherence to ERP achieves a reproducible improvement in the quality of care by enabling standardization of health care processes, and can and should be routinely used in care after colorectal and other major gastrointestinal procedures.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of aggression and psychosis in Alzheimer's disease.

TL;DR: Evidence suggests that risperidone and olanzapine are useful in reducing aggression and ris peridone reduces psychosis, but both are associated with serious adverse cerebrovascular events and extrapyramidal symptoms.
Journal ArticleDOI

2015 updated method guideline for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group

TL;DR: This update of the method guideline for systematic reviews of trials of interventions for neck and back pain, and related spinal disorders includes updated recommendations in 7 categories: objectives, literature search, selection criteria, risk of bias assessment, data extraction, data analysis, and reporting of results and conclusions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present guidelines for choosing among six different forms of the intraclass correlation for reliability studies in which n target are rated by k judges, and the confidence intervals for each of the forms are reviewed.
Book

Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose three basic concepts: devising the items, selecting the items and selecting the responses, from items to scales, reliability and validity of the responses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

TL;DR: Empirical evidence is provided that inadequate methodological approaches in controlled trials, particularly those representing poor allocation concealment, are associated with bias.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use.

TL;DR: The characteristics of several major methods (Delphi, Nominal Group, and models developed by the National Institutes of Health and Glaser) are surveyed and guidelines for those who want to use the techniques are provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.

TL;DR: A reasonable standard design and conduct of trials will facilitate the interpretation of those with conflicting results and help in making valid combinations of undersized trials.
Related Papers (5)