Asymptomatic recurrences of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation.

TLDR: Reliance on perception of AF by patients after PVI results in an underestimation of recurrence of the arrhythmia and the success of ablation is evaluated.

Abstract: Aims The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) and wrong AF perception after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We evaluated the success of ablation by using the following measurements: (i) clinical symptoms and duration of symptoms noticed by patients and (ii) synchronous event recording (ER). Methods and results Eighty patients with paroxysmal AF underwent PVI and were provided repeatedly with a portable ER upon discharge and every 3 months for a year. The ER automatically detects arrhythmias by a detection algorithm and can also be manually triggered by the patient. In 46/80 patients (57.5%), episodes of AF were documented. Asymptomatic AF was detected in 21.3%. In 9/80 patients (11.3%), who reported clinical AF recurrence, no AF could be shown by ER. We compared patients’ perception to have suffered AF episodes with the ERs and found a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 92%. Conclusion Reliance on perception of AF by patients after PVI results in an underestimation of recurrence of the arrhythmia. We observed a maximal occurrence of silent AF or wrong perception of AF in 26/80 (32.6%) patients.