scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond the “Revolving Door?”: Incentives and Criminal Recidivism in a Mental Health Court:

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, a mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the effectiveness of one specialized mental health court (MHC) on different measures of criminal recidivism with logistic regression, event history analysis, and negative binomial regression.
Abstract
Specialized mental health courts (MHCs) address the growing problem of defendants with mental illness cycling through the criminal justice system. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this article explores if MHCs can slow the “revolving door” of criminal justice involvement. We use quantitative data to evaluate the effectiveness of one MHC on different measures of criminal recidivism with logistic regression, event history analysis, and negative binomial regression. Modeling strategies report that graduates of MHC, defendants offered a dismissal of criminal charges, and defendants who maintained the same noncrisis mental health treatment while in court as they had prior to court had lower odds of new criminal charges, a longer time to a new criminal charge, and fewer new criminal charges. Qualitative data—court observations and interviews—suggest that providing incentives for program compliance, connecting defendants to planned mental health treatment services, and court completion are central to reducing...

read more

Citations
More filters

Examining Mental Health Court Completion: A Focal Concerns Perspective

TL;DR: This paper used a mixed-method approach to examine focal concerns in a mental health court (MHC) and found that gender and length of time in court influence the court's contextualization of noncompliance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Successful Reintegration and Mental Health: An Examination of Gender Differences Among Reentering Offenders

TL;DR: In the year after leaving prison, men and women with mental health problems reported worse health indicators and less satisfactory social factors, such as employment, housing, and family support.
Journal ArticleDOI

“You Know Baseball? 3 Strikes”: Understanding Racial Disparity with Mixed Methods for Probation Review Hearings

TL;DR: This paper examined the factors that influence judicial sanctioning of probationers for non-compliance in a domestic violence court and found that drug use, missed treatment sessions, gender, race, and family status influenced sanctioning decisions.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Three Stage Model for Mental Health Treatment Court: A Qualitative Analysis of Graduates' Perspectives.

TL;DR: A qualitative research group interview design was conducted with program graduates resulting in a three stage model and participant’s motivation was initially to avoid jail, but over time participants begin to make intentional choices leading to mental health recovery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing the Effect of Mental Health Courts on Adult and Juvenile Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a meta-analysis of 38 effect sizes collected from 30 evaluations conducted from 1997 through 2020 on the impact of mental health courts on recidivism for adults and juveniles with mental health issues in the United States.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Analyzing Offense Patterns as a Function of Mental Illness to Test the Criminalization Hypothesis

TL;DR: Offenders with serious mental illness manifested heterogeneous patterns of offending that may stem from a variety of sources, and treatment that targets impulsivity and other common criminogenic needs may be needed to prevent recidivism for the larger group.
Journal ArticleDOI

Seattle's mental health courts: early indicators of effectiveness.

TL;DR: Empirical evidence of the effectiveness of MHCs has been very limited and benchmarks from which different court decisions can be derived are very limited.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patterns of practice in mental health courts: A national survey.

TL;DR: Most courts (92%) reported using jail as a sanction for noncompliance, if only rarely, and jail sanction use was significantly predicted by increased judicial supervision and number of felons in the court.
Journal ArticleDOI

The second generation of mental health courts

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify four dimensions distinguishing 1stfrom 2nd-generation mental health courts: the acceptance of felony versus misdemeanant defendants, preversus post-adjudication models, the use of jail as a sanction, and the type of court supervision.
Related Papers (5)