scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The present study shows that equality between proportions of responses and proportions of reinforcements ("matching") is obtained when the value of the changeover delay is varied.
Abstract
Pigeons distribute their responses on concurrently available variable-interval schedules in the same proportion as reinforcements are distributed on the two schedules only when a changeover delay is used. The present study shows that this equality between proportions of responses and proportions of reinforcements (“matching”) is obtained when the value of the changeover delay is varied. When responses are partitioned into the set of rapid response bursts occurring during the delay interval and the set of responses occurring subsequently, the proportion of neither set of responses matches the proportion of reinforcements. Instead, each set deviates from matching but in opposite directions. Matching on the gross level results from the interaction of two patterns evident in the local response rates: (I) the lengthening of the changeover delay response burst is accompanied by a commensurate decrease in the number of changeovers; (2) the changeover delay response burst is longer than the scheduled delay duration. When delay responses are eliminated by introducing a blackout during the delay interval, response matching is eliminated; the pigeon, however, continues to match the proportion of time spent responding on a key to the proportion of reinforcements obtained on that key.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Concurrent random interval schedules of reinforcement

TL;DR: In this paper, two pigeons were trained on concurrent random interval schedules of reinforcement and the parameters of the schedules were then changed to make them progressively more ratio-like, while maintaining their average interreinforcement intervals of 32 and 64 sec.
Journal ArticleDOI

Concurrent Schedules: Effects of Blackout during the Changeover Delay

TL;DR: The reults suggest that the finding of overmatching with procedures other than the changeover delay does not depend exclusively on the absence of responding in the interval that elapses between initiation of the change to an alternative and the first response eligible for reinforcement.

The acquisition and generalization of matching.

TL;DR: The comparison of relative responding, frequency of changeovers, and interchangeover time distributions during the discriminated concurrent probes obtained during these training conditions showed that the response of switching between keys required training in order that time should be allocated to each key according to the matching law.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effects of changeover delays on local choice.

TL;DR: It is suggested that the COD affects preference pulses by both decreasing the probability of switching and creating a change in reinforcer availability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rate matching, probability matching, and optimization in concurrent ratio schedules.

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors compared concurrent variable-ratio schedules with interval schedules and showed that the ratio schedules cannot improve with time the way interval schedules do; ratio schedules lack the temporal dynamics of interval schedules.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement

TL;DR: The present experiment is a study of strength of response of pigeons on a concurrent schedule under which they peck at either of two response-keys and investigates output as a function of frequency of reinforcement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

TL;DR: When a pigeon's pecks on two keys were reinforced concurrently by two independent variable-interval (VI) schedules, one for each key, the response rate on either key was given by the equation: R(1)=R(1)/(r(1)+r(2))(5/6), where R is response rate, r is reinforcement rate, and the subscripts 1 and 2 indicate keys 1 and 1.
Journal ArticleDOI

Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures

TL;DR: The pigeon and the rat partition total response output between both schedules of a concurrent variable-interval pair is studied and the quantitative nature of a partition seems critically dependent on the relative rates with which the two schedules provide reinforcements for responding, in addition to the changeover delay.
Related Papers (5)