scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles

TLDR
In this paper, the authors developed and provided a transparent life cycle inventory of conventional and electric vehicles and applied their inventory to assess conventional and EVs over a range of impact categories, including human toxicity, freshwater eco-toxicity, freshwater eutrophication, and metal depletion impacts, largely emanating from the vehicle supply chain.
Abstract
Summary Electric vehicles (EVs) coupled with low-carbon electricity sources offer the potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and exposure to tailpipe emissions from personal transportation. In considering these benefits, it is important to address concerns of problemshifting. In addition, while many studies have focused on the use phase in comparing transportation options, vehicle production is also significant when comparing conventional and EVs. We develop and provide a transparent life cycle inventory of conventional and electric vehicles and apply our inventory to assess conventional and EVs over a range of impact categories. We find that EVs powered by the present European electricity mix offer a 10% to 24% decrease in global warming potential (GWP) relative to conventional diesel or gasoline vehicles assuming lifetimes of 150,000 km. However, EVs exhibit the potential for significant increases in human toxicity, freshwater eco-toxicity, freshwater eutrophication, and metal depletion impacts, largely emanating from the vehicle supply chain. Results are sensitive to assumptions regarding electricity source, use phase energy consumption, vehicle lifetime, and battery replacement schedules. Because production impacts are more significant for EVs than conventional vehicles, assuming a vehicle lifetime of 200,000 km exaggerates the GWP benefits of EVs to 27% to 29% relative to gasoline vehicles or 17% to 20% relative to diesel. An assumption of 100,000 km decreases the benefit of EVs to 9% to 14% with respect to gasoline vehicles and results in impacts indistinguishable from those of a diesel vehicle. Improving the environmental profile of EVs requires engagement around reducing vehicle production supply chain impacts and promoting clean electricity sources in decision making regarding electricity infrastructure.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters - A review

TL;DR: In this article, a review of LCA studies on Li-Ion batteries, with a focus on the battery production process, is presented, and the main assumptions are extracted in order to provide a quick overview of the technical key parameters used in each study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Life Cycle Assessment of a Lithium-Ion Battery Vehicle Pack

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provided a transparent inventory for a lithium-ion nickel-cobalt-manganese traction battery based on primary data and reported its cradle-to-gate impacts.
Journal ArticleDOI

The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions

TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider a broad range of individual lifestyle choices and calculate their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in developed countries, based on 148 scenarios from 39 sources, and recommend four widely applicable high-impact (i.e. low emissions) actions with the potential to contribute to systemic change and substantially reduce annual personal emissions: having one fewer child (an average for developed countries of 58.6 tonnes CO2-equivalent (tCO2e) emission reductions per year), living car-free (2.4 tCO 2e saved per year).
Journal ArticleDOI

Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the usefulness of different types of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of electrified vehicles to provide robust and relevant stakeholder information, and present synthesized conclusions based on 79 papers.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Building better batteries

TL;DR: Researchers must find a sustainable way of providing the power their modern lifestyles demand to ensure the continued existence of clean energy sources.

Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

TL;DR: Drafting Authors: Neil Adger, Pramod Aggarwal, Shardul Agrawala, Joseph Alcamo, Abdelkader Allali, Oleg Anisimov, Nigel Arnell, Michel Boko, Osvaldo Canziani, Timothy Carter, Gino Casassa, Ulisses Confalonieri, Rex Victor Cruz, Edmundo de Alba Alcaraz, William Easterling, Christopher Field, Andreas Fischlin, Blair Fitzharris.
Book

Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards

TL;DR: The Guide to LCA is a guide to the management of LCA projects: procedures and guiding principles for the present Guide, which aims to clarify goal and scope definition, impact assessment, and interpretation.
Book

Electric Vehicle Technology Explained

James Larminie, +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an overview of the development of electric vehicles in the 20th century and present a brief history of electric vehicle development and its development towards the end of the 1990s.

Economic Commission for Europe

English Only
TL;DR: In 2018, the Finnish economy grew by 1.7 percent as mentioned in this paper, and in the last quarter of the year the growth was no more than 0.1 percent compared to the third quarter.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How does the electric vehicle production process harm the environment?

Electric vehicle production harms the environment due to high greenhouse gas emissions, with EVs having double the production phase impact compared to conventional vehicles, mainly from battery and engine production.