scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Positive contact reduces prejudice on a macrolevel, whereby people are influenced by the behavior of others in their social context, not merely on a microscale, via individuals’ direct experience of positive contact with outgroup members.
Abstract
We assessed evidence for a contextual effect of positive intergroup contact, whereby the effect of intergroup contact between social contexts (the between-level effect) on outgroup prejudice is greater than the effect of individual-level contact within contexts (the within-level effect). Across seven large-scale surveys (five cross-sectional and two longitudinal), using multilevel analyses, we found a reliable contextual effect. This effect was found in multiple countries, operationalizing context at multiple levels (regions, districts, and neighborhoods), and with and without controlling for a range of demographic and context variables. In four studies (three cross-sectional and one longitudinal) we showed that the association between context-level contact and prejudice was largely mediated by more tolerant norms. In social contexts where positive contact with outgroups was more commonplace, norms supported such positive interactions between members of different groups. Thus, positive contact reduces prejudice on a macrolevel, whereby people are influenced by the behavior of others in their social context, not merely on a microscale, via individuals’ direct experience of positive contact with outgroup members. These findings reinforce the view that contact has a significant role to play in prejudice reduction, and has great policy potential as a means to improve intergroup relations, because it can simultaneously impact large numbers of people.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book

Annual Review of Sociology

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an annual review of sociology book, which is referred for you because it gives not only the experience but also the lesson, and the lessons are very valuable to serve for you.
Journal ArticleDOI

In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and Intergroup Contact

TL;DR: This autobiographical review article summarizes some of the advances in these three areas of authoritarianism, linking it with threat and dismissive-avoidant attachment, and studying how authoritarians avoid intergroup contact during the past six decades.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions

TL;DR: The authors focused on the direct relationship between antecedents (conditions under which contact occurs) and the outcomes (primarily, the reduction of prejudice) of the contact hypothesis and found no evidence that the antecedent-response relationship is causal.
Journal ArticleDOI

The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity

TL;DR: Person-based factors influence a range of meaningful life outcomes, including intergroup processes, and have long been implicated in explaining prejudice as mentioned in this paper, and they are evident in expressions of generalised prejudice, a robust finding that some people consistently score higher in prejudice towards multiple outgroups.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consequences of Diversity for Social Cohesion and Prejudice: The Missing Dimension of Intergroup Contact

TL;DR: This paper argued that the efficacy of direct, face-to-face intergroup contact as a means of reducing prejudice is a stark omission, as they illustrate with evidence of the association between diversity, on the one hand, and trust, prejudice, and social capital on the other.
References
More filters
Book

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

TL;DR: The concepts of power analysis are discussed in this paper, where Chi-square Tests for Goodness of Fit and Contingency Tables, t-Test for Means, and Sign Test are used.
Book

The Nature of Prejudice

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the dynamics of prejudgment, including: Frustration, Aggression and Hatred, Anxiety, Sex, and Guilt, Demagogy, and Tolerant Personality.
Journal ArticleDOI

A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.

TL;DR: The meta-analysis finds that intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice, and this result suggests that contact theory, devised originally for racial and ethnic encounters, can be extended to other groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

Intergroup contact theory

TL;DR: The chapter proposes four processes: learning about the outgroup, changed behavior, affective ties, and ingroup reappraisal, and distinguishes between essential and facilitating factors, and emphasizes different outcomes for different stages of contact.
Journal ArticleDOI

E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty‐first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture

TL;DR: The authors found that in ethnically diverse neighbourhoods residents of all races tend to "hunker down" and trust (even of one's own race) is lower, altruism and community cooperation rarer, friends fewer.
Related Papers (5)